Woman Faces 40 Years In Prison For Porn Popups! "Risking Injury To A Minor" - NO JOKE - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

BoyAlley

So Fucking Gay

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 19714
Share

Post
#1

Woman Faces 40 Years In Prison For Porn Popups! "Risking Injury To A Minor" - NO JOKE

01-26-2007, 06:21 AM

From PC World Magazine:

Julie Amero, a substitute teacher in Norwich, Connecticut, has been convicted of impairing the morals of a child and risking injury to a minor by exposing as many as ten seventh-grade students to porn sites.

The story is short: On October, 19, 2004, Amero was a substitute teacher for a seventh-grade language class at Kelly Middle School. A few students were crowded around a PC; some were giggling. She investigated and saw the kids looking at a barrage of graphic, hard-core pornographic pop-ups.

The prosecution contended that she had used the computer to visit porn sites.

The defense said that wasn't true and argued that the machine was infested with spyware and malware, and that opening the browser caused the computer to go into an endless loop of pop-ups leading to porn sites.

Amero maintains her innocence. She refused offers of a plea bargain and now faces an astounding 40 years in prison (her sentencing is on March 2).

http://blogs.pcworld.com/tipsandtwea...es/003613.html

Could Zango now be causing people to get sent to jail for 40 years?!?! This is Dramas with a capital D!
Tags: None
BoyAlley

So Fucking Gay

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 19714
Share

Post
#2

01-26-2007, 06:24 AM

Most of the comments from readers are right on point, too:

An incident like this lies squarely on the shoulders of the System Administrator of that school system's network. What filtering software is installed and is it configured to keep the network PC/MACs from "seeing" porn sites? Why isn't the router and firewall configuration set up to block porn and other "non-educational" sites during school hours?
Comment
pinkz

Mr 1%

Join Date: May 2005

Posts: 1397
Share

Post
#3

01-26-2007, 06:27 AM

it is indeed a serious bone for contention

me thinks it will be issues like this that force .xxx domains upon the industry
which in a way is not a bad thing as it makes it easier to block porn from the curious gaze of minors.

$$$$ Video Secrets $$$$
Comment
L-Pink

working on my tan

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 39151
Share

Post
#4

01-26-2007, 06:28 AM

Go after the spyware/malware guys ..........
Comment
BoyAlley

So Fucking Gay

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 19714
Share

Post
#5

01-26-2007, 06:32 AM

From a different new source:

Detective Mark Lounsbury, a computer crimes officer at the Norwich Police Department testified as an expert witness for the prosecution. He maintained that Amero was intentionally surfing for pornography while her seventh grade class busied itself with language arts.

Lounsbury told the court that Amero musts have "physically clicked" on pornographic links during class time in order to unleash the pornographic pictures. However, he admitted under cross-examination that the prosecution never even checked the computer for malware.

http://www.alternet.org/rights/46925/
Comment
Quickdraw

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2004

Posts: 1717
Share

Post
#6

01-26-2007, 06:34 AM

Originally posted by pinkz

it is indeed a serious bone for contention

me thinks it will be issues like this that force .xxx domains upon the industry
which in a way is not a bad thing as it makes it easier to block porn from the curious gaze of minors.

Have you ever used Tools>>Internet Options>>Content>>Enable ???

.xxx is not needed to block porn. This tool is built in all modern browsers. Sites that aren't rated simply don't get through.

If that is too hard to find and use, parents can use this tool free http://www.parentalcontrolbar.org/

There is really no more excuses available for ignorance and/or laziness by parents and teachers alike.
Comment
L-Pink

working on my tan

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 39151
Share

Post
#7

01-26-2007, 06:38 AM

Originally posted by Quickdraw

Have you ever used Tools>>Internet Options>>Content>>Enable ???

.xxx is not needed to block porn. This tool is built in all modern browsers. Sites that aren't rated simply don't get through.

If that is too hard to find and use, parents can use this tool free http://www.parentalcontrolbar.org/

There is really no more excuses available for ignorance and/or laziness by parents and teachers alike.
Comment
robfantasy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 6445
Share

Post
#8

01-26-2007, 06:39 AM

no way in hell she will get convicted

Looking to speak w/ high volume nutra CPA affiliates or networks... msg me
Comment
BoyAlley

So Fucking Gay

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 19714
Share

Post
#9

01-26-2007, 06:41 AM

Originally posted by robfantasy

no way in hell she will get convicted

If you read and comprehended the brief little paragraph, you'd find out that she's ALREADY BEEN CONVICTED OF THE FOUR FELONY COUNTS.
Comment
who

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 19593
Share

Post
#10

01-26-2007, 06:41 AM

her life is ruined now anyway conviction or not. Plus, this crap takes us one step closer to .xxx ..... it's just unbelievable.
Comment
Hollywood376

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 1154
Share

Post
#11

01-26-2007, 06:56 AM

Originally posted by BoyAlley

If you read and comprehended the brief little paragraph, you'd find out that she's ALREADY BEEN CONVICTED OF THE FOUR FELONY COUNTS.

what he said.

ICQ 251796771
Comment
Ayla_SquareTurtle

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 3550
Share

Post
#12

01-26-2007, 07:00 AM

god that poor woman. Hell, even if she stripped off her own clothes and started masturbating in front of the class, is that really worthy of 40 years? Some murderers dont even get that! I'm amazed that they were able to get a convincing enough computer expert to testify about possible spyware, etc on ther machine.

gone. long gone.

aylasquareturtle .."a"t".. gmail dawt com
Comment
LustyBucks

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2006

Posts: 722
Share

Post
#13

01-26-2007, 07:07 AM

This is fucking ridiculous. 40 years in prison! The absurd.

LustyBucks Affiliate Program - earn $40-$100 Per Join on Live Cams
URL: http://www.lustybucks.com
ICQ: 475-703-766, 205-825-691
Comment
TheSenator

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 13330
Share

Post
#14

01-26-2007, 07:09 AM

I personally know a state trooper who is on the computer crime task force. He is a complete idiot and still uses AOL to surf the Internet.

ISeekGirls.com since 2005
Comment
jimthefiend

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 18889
Share

Post
#15

01-26-2007, 07:10 AM

I bet it was Zango.
Comment
L-Pink

working on my tan

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 39151
Share

Post
#16

01-26-2007, 07:12 AM

I would like to see a picture of her defense attorney.
Comment
4Man

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2006

Posts: 3830
Share

Post
#17

01-26-2007, 07:17 AM

That is bad ........lol
Comment
KingK7

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 6372
Share

Post
#18

01-26-2007, 07:27 AM

Hahahaha, it just does not get any more retarded than this.
Comment
Brad

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2007

Posts: 2510
Share

Post
#19

01-26-2007, 07:30 AM

people are retarded. it's easy as shit to control what content is available in today's browsers or through the backend. I agree that it was the IT guy's fault at the school as he/she should have taken care of this. Maybe this is actuall her lucky day, I'm sure she will get off as there will be no evidence that she even used the comp. Then she can sue for damages and fleece the tax payers for as much cash as she can get her hands on. Oh how I love the States...lol.

Affiliate Manager/Media Buyer
ICQ 376 978 529
Skype: bradleyjwscott
[email protected]
Comment
pinkz

Mr 1%

Join Date: May 2005

Posts: 1397
Share

Post
#20

01-26-2007, 07:32 AM

Originally posted by Quickdraw

Have you ever used Tools>>Internet Options>>Content>>Enable ???

.xxx is not needed to block porn. This tool is built in all modern browsers. Sites that aren't rated simply don't get through.

If that is too hard to find and use, parents can use this tool free http://www.parentalcontrolbar.org/

There is really no more excuses available for ignorance and/or laziness by parents and teachers alike.

couldnt agree more as u and i know how to use Tools>>Internet Options>>Content>>Enable
unfortunately there are many that dont, but im shure some doo goody christian government official wont see it that way and like every thing else in your life those same government officials like to be in control of it or at least think they are

$$$$ Video Secrets $$$$
Comment
EscortBiz

Fuck Checks, CASH only!

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 19422
Share

Post
#21

01-26-2007, 07:34 AM

this is fucked up i bet noone on the jury understands malware or anything like that or no way in hell would they convict because there is a good chance it was infected.

there are clips all over youtube making fun of people infected with malware getting hit with fucked up popups

Spanking, Medical Fetish, Sleeping, Strap-on Anal Lesbians, Girls Fucking Guys, Handjob site REAL HOT, Shemales, Anal and Ass Licking sites 100% Real EXCLUSIVE with amazing retention, ccbill payouts, lots of content FREE FTP HOSTING

Promote the largest and oldest member paid escort site, Converts 10 times better then any dating site, CCBill payouts

ICQ# 158802076
Comment
Phoenix

BACON BACON BACON

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 35475
Share

Post
#22

01-26-2007, 07:35 AM

i hope she rots in prison...imagine...showing porn to kids

i fully back the gestapo tactics of the usa

Telegram PhoenixBrad
https://quantads.io
Comment
BoyAlley

So Fucking Gay

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 19714
Share

Post
#23

01-26-2007, 08:24 AM

I just called this woman's attorney and offered my assistance should they need it. This is a HUGE injustice and can't be allowed to stand.
Comment
pornguy

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 62910
Share

Post
#24

01-26-2007, 08:28 AM

Originally posted by pinkz

it is indeed a serious bone for contention

me thinks it will be issues like this that force .xxx domains upon the industry
which in a way is not a bad thing as it makes it easier to block porn from the curious gaze of minors.

You have a lot to learn about .xxx If that were to go into effect, your sales would drop to about 1% of what they ever were. AOL would be the first to stop thier paying customers from visiting .xxx sites, and others would follow. It would be like AMEX not processing porn. they made a decision for thier card holders.

PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!
Comment
RF_Erick

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2005

Posts: 946
Share

Post
#25

01-26-2007, 08:36 AM

She wont get 40 years. She might not even get jail time according to lawyers.
Each charge has a max of 10 years, thats how they came up with 40 years.

Exclusive Reality Feeds - [email protected] - ICQ: 4144516
Comment
SmokeyTheBear

►SouthOfHeaven

Join Date: Jun 2004

Posts: 28609
Share

Post
#26

01-26-2007, 08:37 AM

Originally posted by BoyAlley

I just called this woman's attorney and offered my assistance should they need it. This is a HUGE injustice and can't be allowed to stand.

this article was posted earlier this month , you would be suprised by the amount of gfyers that didnt see anything wrong with her being convicted..

Im ashamed as an american that they have such ignorant "experts" testifying , while the qualified ones arent..
"
Lounsbury told the court that Amero musts have "physically clicked" on pornographic links during class time in order to unleash the pornographic pictures"

bullshit the guy must not know even the basics of the internet

hatisblack at yahoo.com
Comment
SmokeyTheBear

►SouthOfHeaven

Join Date: Jun 2004

Posts: 28609
Share

Post
#27

01-26-2007, 08:38 AM

Originally posted by RF_Erick

She wont get 40 years. She might not even get jail time according to lawyers.
Each charge has a max of 10 years, thats how they came up with 40 years.

im sure many would have said the same thing about her being convicted in the first place.. yet here we are..

hatisblack at yahoo.com
Comment
RawAlex

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 9465
Share

Post
#28

01-26-2007, 08:44 AM

Actually, there is something good to be had here. Clearly, if you can go to jail for causing popups to be displayed, then the purveyors of these popups are, well, really in trouble, no?

It would show potential injury to a person against any company that installs software to make popups, or any clever guy (hi smokey!) that comes up with ways to force popups even if someone has installed a popup blocker.

Nice.
Comment
BoyAlley

So Fucking Gay

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 19714
Share

Post
#29

01-26-2007, 08:49 AM

Originally posted by RF_Erick

She wont get 40 years. She might not even get jail time according to lawyers.
Each charge has a max of 10 years, thats how they came up with 40 years.

I don't care if she just gets probation, she's now a CONVICTED FELON, and as such she will LOOSE HER TEACHER'S LICENSE.
Comment
Agent 488

Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2006

Posts: 22511
Share

Post
#30

01-26-2007, 08:51 AM

should sue zango.
Comment
96ukssob

So Fucking Banananananas

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 12991
Share

Post
#31

01-26-2007, 08:57 AM

Thats fucked up if its not her fault. In my defense I would of said "wtf is the point of showing porn to 7th graders... they dont have credit cards to join?"

Ive used this excuse many times when I used to work at the college library while working on my sites

Email: Clicky on Me
Comment
sherie

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 7020
Share

Post
#32

01-26-2007, 09:11 AM

This is absurd!! By the sounds of it, her defence team did not put on the best defense either....They should have had 200 expert witnesses. And someone should hold the admins responsible for not having firewalls etc., Christ, our local libraries have more security then that!!!

I am shocked an appauled.

And Ayla AAA - If a male teacher got naked infront of his class room and started jerking off, would you have the same opinion? Come on!

AIM sherierocks
ICQ 127-296-286
Skype traffichor
Comment
Pleasurepays

BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 11913
Share

Post
#33

01-26-2007, 09:16 AM

Originally posted by EscortBiz

this is fucked up i bet noone on the jury understands malware or anything like that or no way in hell would they convict because there is a good chance it was infected.

there are clips all over youtube making fun of people infected with malware getting hit with fucked up popups

everyone responds with remarks like this as if the defense does not have the full and complete opportunity to educate the jury.

juries aren't typically experts on armed robbery, murder, arson and rape either.. yet the system seems to work pretty well for the accused.
Comment
Ayla_SquareTurtle

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 3550
Share

Post
#34

01-26-2007, 09:21 AM

Originally posted by sherie

And Ayla AAA - If a male teacher got naked infront of his class room and started jerking off, would you have the same opinion? Come on!

yes I would. I think taking someones life is worse than masturbating in front of children. call me crazy. Obviously I am not condoning that behavior. It would certainly deserve strict punishment, but not a worse punishment than someone who stabs a child 37 times or some other equally horrific crime.

gone. long gone.

aylasquareturtle .."a"t".. gmail dawt com
Comment
pocketkangaroo

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2005

Posts: 8452
Share

Post
#35

01-26-2007, 09:26 AM

Originally posted by Pleasurepays

everyone responds with remarks like this as if the defense does not have the full and complete opportunity to educate the jury.

juries aren't typically experts on armed robbery, murder, arson and rape either.. yet the system seems to work pretty well for the accused.

It doesn't help when the prosecution can bring in "computer experts" who don't know shit about the Internet to make the defense look bad. What if they put you on trial for murder and brought in a "DNA expert" who didn't know shit about DNA? How can you compete?
Comment
pocketkangaroo

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2005

Posts: 8452
Share

Post
#36

01-26-2007, 09:27 AM

She should have just fucked a couple kids in the class. If she was hot, she'd just get some probation if she said she was bi-polar or something.
Comment
sherie

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 7020
Share

Post
#37

01-26-2007, 09:30 AM

Originally posted by Ayla_AAA

yes I would. I think taking someones life is worse than masturbating in front of children. call me crazy. Obviously I am not condoning that behavior. It would certainly deserve strict punishment, but not a worse punishment than someone who stabs a child 37 times or some other equally horrific crime.

They are completely different crimes. It's not like she got 40 years, it's the max that she could get. Just like those who commit murder, the maximum sentence's are usually life without the possibility of parole (depending on what the charge is) Who know's what one would get charged with if they ended up getting naked and masterbating in front of a classroom full of children.

Either way, it's ridiculous. And is like compairing apple's to orange's. I just wanted to see where you stood.

The fact that she was even convicted is asinine, I agree with those sentiments!

Last edited by sherie; 01-26-2007, 09:32 AM.

AIM sherierocks
ICQ 127-296-286
Skype traffichor
Comment
EscortBiz

Fuck Checks, CASH only!

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 19422
Share

Post
#38

01-26-2007, 09:45 AM

Originally posted by Pleasurepays

everyone responds with remarks like this as if the defense does not have the full and complete opportunity to educate the jury.

juries aren't typically experts on armed robbery, murder, arson and rape either.. yet the system seems to work pretty well for the accused.

Again you are comparing things that anyone can understand to something that if you persoanlly did not have experience with it you wont believe it.

For example since the start of time people have been murdered and robbed etc would a jury believe a story such as ?the gun just went off by me simply touching the hostler?

Try explaining your dad or someone who has personally never experienced things just popping up on their computer without doing anything, noone would believe you.

I don?t know her I didn?t study the case and I wasn?t present at the trial and neither where you, my point is there is a very very good chance that it was spyware, heck what if the janitor used that computer the night before to surf, so many ways shit could of happened.

If even one person on the jury would of experienced spyware she would not of been convicted.

Now maybe there is more to it, maybe she was sitting there talking about the porn to the kids, im talking based on the story in the papers.

Spanking, Medical Fetish, Sleeping, Strap-on Anal Lesbians, Girls Fucking Guys, Handjob site REAL HOT, Shemales, Anal and Ass Licking sites 100% Real EXCLUSIVE with amazing retention, ccbill payouts, lots of content FREE FTP HOSTING

Promote the largest and oldest member paid escort site, Converts 10 times better then any dating site, CCBill payouts

ICQ# 158802076
Comment
TG Rebecca

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2006

Posts: 2450
Share

Post
#39

01-26-2007, 09:48 AM

WOW, that is crazy. i sure hope she doesn't get found guilty. sooo ridiculous.

ICQ: 263-993 | AIM: TG Rep Rebecca
Email: [email protected]
Comment
sherie

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 7020
Share

Post
#40

01-26-2007, 10:15 AM

Originally posted by TG Rebecca

WOW, that is crazy. i sure hope she doesn't get found guilty. sooo ridiculous.

That's the problem, she WAS found guilty, she WAS convicted.

People, you need to read the thread headliner before commenting lol

AIM sherierocks
ICQ 127-296-286
Skype traffichor
Comment
ayne468

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2007

Posts: 1738
Share

Post
#41

01-26-2007, 10:38 AM

Yeah, it will be interesting to see what happens on this one...there is always the chance that they will want to make an example of her, by giving her a max sentance to try and deter others! 40 years does seem quite extreme though...however if she was looking at porn whilst teaching, well thats just wrong!!!!!
Comment
Luscious Media

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 785
Share

Post
#42

01-26-2007, 10:41 AM

Unfortunately this is all happening in my home town. The fact that it was a laptop and not a PC makes me wonder what was actually on it. Did she ever take it home? Did others have access to it? A friend and fellow educator was quoted as saying she felt the kids had actually got on the computer and caused the problem in the first place.

Did she do something wrong? Probably not. Will she do 40 years? Probably not. Did the system railroad her? Probably.

If she's truly innocent she can appeal (hopefully with a better attorney), and if she wins, she can sue.

The sad thing is, the Norwich police have no clue and should never be considered expert witnesses when it comes to computers and the internet. I would offer my help but I'm more concerned about being labeled a degenerate or worse, being thrown in jail.

Luscious Media
ICQ: 293-550-859
CFNM Cash
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#43

01-26-2007, 10:44 AM

Another example of more idiots in action - this time in the criminal justice system. Damn.. they are everywhere

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...