Quote:
Originally Posted by wig
You are conflating religion with government using a weak analogy and then ask me a misleading question by only using the word religion. As best I can tell, I think your point is a non-sequitur.
This is not to say that there should not be any dissent and clearly we (USA) have dissent, including those who break the law as a form. We also have processes for this and it is ingrained in our founding documents.
Maybe you would like to expand on your big picture.
|
You might think it's weak but it's strong enough to fool most amd it's very real. As far as the founding documents you mentioned
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it."
Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah
Hmm so the Constituution isn't for us? Then who or what is it for? I know, do you? Just another part of the con.