?Don?t be surprised if it becomes reality in the near future,? writes ZD Net?s Doug Hanchard. ?Every device connected to the Internet will have a permament license plate and without it, the network won?t allow you to log in.?
The graphic below illustrates how you would be blocked from using the Internet if your device had not obtained government permission to access the network.
Another method would be to make the use of fingerprint scanners that are included on a lot of new computer models mandatory. You would have to register your fingerprint at a central government data center and then scan each time you want to access the Internet. Misbehave online and your access will be denied.
?One thing is for sure,? concludes Hanchard, ?A lot of money is going to be spent trying and sooner or later, everyone may have to pay with an Internet cop instant messaging you ? ?license and registration please?.
It seems certain that cyber security problems will be exploited or even manufactured to justify the move to Internet licensing. Authorities need to create a strong pretext to justify measures that would otherwise be rightly rejected for what they truly represent ? government regulation and censorship of the web that would outstrip anything the Communist Chinese have attempted.
Internet censorship bills currently working their way into law in the UK, Australia and the U.S. legislate for government powers to restrict and filter any website that it deems to be undesirable for public consumption.
In the UK, legislation slated as the ?Digital Economy Bill?, currently being debated in the House of Lords, would allow the Home Secretary to place ?a technical obligation on internet service providers? to block whichever sites it wishes.
Under clause 11 of the proposed legislation ?technical obligation? is defined as follows:
A ?technical obligation?, in relation to an internet service provider, is an obligation for the provider to take a technical measure against particular subscribers to its service.
A ?technical measure? is a measure that ? (a) limits the speed or other capacity of the service provided to a subscriber; (b) prevents a subscriber from using the service to gain access to particular material, or limits such use; (c) suspends the service provided to a subscriber; or (d) limits the service provided to a subscriber in another way.
In other words, the government will have the power to force ISPs to downgrade and even block your internet access to certain websites or altogether if it wishes.
The legislation comes in the wake of amplified UK government efforts to seize more power over the internet and those who use it.
For months now unelected ?Secretary of State? Lord Mandelson has overseen government efforts to challenge the independence of the of UK?s internet infrastructure.
Mandelson also wants to impose harsh policies, via the Digital Economy Bill, that would see users? broadband access cut off indefinitely, in addition to a fine of up to £50,000 without evidence or trial, if they download copyrighted music and films. The plan has been identified as ?potentially illegal? by experts.
The legislation would impose a duty on ISPs to effectively spy on all their customers by keeping records of the websites they have visited and the material they have downloaded. ISPs who refuse to cooperate could be fined £250,000.
As Journalist and copyright law expert Cory Doctrow has noted, the bill also gives the Secretary of State the power to make up as many new penalties and enforcement systems as he likes, without Parliamentary oversight or debate.
This could include the authority to appoint private militias, who will have the power to kick you off the internet, spy on your use of the network, demand the removal of files in addition to the blocking of websites.
more..
http://www.infowars.com/enemies-of-f...net-licensing/