Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Now on the other hand, the solo girls who prance around in their underwear and pose all "sexy" on their personal sites...meanwhile shooting for every company in L.A. and doing hardcore for those sites: well that really sucks. And their own site suffers because of it and doesn't rebill once a person joins and sees he's getting a lot less than he expected.
I've never understood why girls do that. It's like they do everything for other people's business but when it comes to their own site they suddenly get all conservative.  |
It happens when girls are overly steeped in a sort of model/performer culture. Talent nobody believes in enough to back on a site will start talking in a girl's ear once she gets a site. They tell her that it is one thing to do whatever for someone whose paying but that she should be "classy" or some nonsense like that on a site which is all about her. Even though, if the girl could do math, she probably is making waaaaaaaaay more from a site where she is the star.
Plus a lot of talent has rights to use unmarketable shots of themselves prancing around in their underwear because folks who shoot that probably can't give them even a teensy paycheck.
I do know a few girls, however, who acted like "spread" shots were against their personal moral something or other and started getting way more naked and explicit, as soon as it was their site at risk of making less dough. Which I think is kinda cheating the people who respected their misrepresented limits and worked with talent which was building up resources and star capital with only a financial issue about nudity levels and not a personal moral or emotional or whatever at all.