Can you believe this is fuck'n digital?

Get off it Dean... I edited that part of my reply out 5 minutes before you posted this.

You are out of line Dean. There is no need to continually disrespect me or my work. It just makes you look worse.

Just my

Now, go ahead and post all you want to this board about me. It will not hurt me in the least. I have other things to do today so I will most likely not be around to respond to your childish attacks.

I dont know about you, but I dislike asshole shots. That is where poop comes from.

You know what is kind of funny..

Dean has been asked 3 times what camera he is using since the thread is supposed to about his digital camera and how great the camera is..

Yet.. he never has answered what type of camera it is..

Pimpshost.. use your new camera and post some picks of some buttholes so we can see how good your digital camera is..


I seriously need a good digital camera and was just wondering and I guess Dean dont want to say..

It's top secret info

Damn it! Some one better say what camera was used. I have now read this whole thread and not got an answer. I want the truth!

Okay folks.. the secret is shooting with a big hole.

>>You know what is kind of funny..

Dean has been asked 3 times what camera he is using since the thread is supposed to about his digital camera and how great the camera is..

Yet.. he never has answered what type of camera it is..
<<

He's using the Olympus Face-Out-Of-Focus 9000.


Nz

He wont tell you cos its a DISPOSABLE Camera

I'll post some pics in a couple days. Maybe K-Man will let me shoot his butt crack on the golf course tomorrow.

LOL

Depth of field. Who cares? Does the photo look okay? That's the question. Is there a law that a photo has to be this way or that, with everything in focus or with focus used to draw attention to something.

You both make some good points.

Planet, I think what pissed people off at you and got people on your case was that your post was an out and out spam. There are plenty of opportunities on this board to put up a shot, as we all know. I myself seldom miss a chance to show off my own material.

I find that photographers who have learned the esotericisms of shooting studio and magazine styles frequently fail to understand that we are in a market that is a bit broader than that. Not everybody wants to see photos shot in that style because when the Internet first got going (and even before that in the BBS era) magazine scans were just about all that was available, and people got sick of that style. I don't know if Charly has figured that out yet, but it's true.

This is why guys like Aaron and me can make a living. Shit, all my lighting is on my camera (combo of fill and bounce), and it keeps a lot of people happy. Many of my own (and Aaron's) customers wouldn't buy anything with an obviously studio or "slick" look on a dare.

The trouble with a lot of the guys who do the studio or magazine style is that they assume that anyone shooting any other style is either incompetent or aesthetically challenged. This is an egotistical and arrogant attitude, and quite ignorant as well. You and Aaron and I are doing commercial photography, and our sole goal is to please our customers with out content, not get into some museum of photography. We have different customer lists, that's all.

Before anyone makes a sweeping statement about photography, he should ask himself "is there a law that says this?" (and this includes Aaron's thoughts about depth of field, which I don't necessarily agree with 100%). Is there a law that says photos should have lots of depth of field? Is there a law saying the opposite? The answer is no in both cases.

On my artsy-fartsy photo site, I have a whole page devoted to "The Myths of Photography," and this sort of thing is discussed there. The site is at http://www.afterglow-photo.com (and this isn't a spam, because there is nothing for sale there which is likely to be purchased by webmasters).

Hey Unseen, Great "Myths of Photography" book! I, as a webmaster, was very interested I just bought 3 copies for myself and 17 more for my friends!!

Nz

we going to get a reply as to what type of camera?

<img src="http://www.disposable-cameras.com/img/bellhowel.jpg" border="0" alt="">

i totally agree at the spam & off topic things BUT I MUST SAY:

planetcontent - those pics are sincerely one of the best i've ever seen... great quality, great creativity, great lightning, great atmosphere, and last but not least; great focus

keep up the good work & you've got my bookmark

How come no one brings up her butthole?

Just her pussy?

I thought I would ask.
=====================================

hmmm... is someone trying to come out of the closet???





http://www.freshgayphotos.com lol

I like that her face is out of focus. It's kinda like putting a bag over her head. The money is nice and clear and that's what counts.

Hey Dean...How's it going?

Your photography still sucks.

Focusing fluid?

That looks like most other red Xs to me, but maybe I am the only one not seeing the pic!

No, I certainly agree that the quality of those red X's is outstanding. You've come along way baby!

i can't believe it's not butter.