-
... -
Anyone think her or the Miss USA Publicist told her to SAY she was 17 in order to try and stop the embarrasment?Comment
-
Comment
-
Peaches = the Rosie O'Donnell of GFY.
Comment
-
Titty licking isn't sexually explicit and simulated acts no longer fall under 2257.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...7----000-.htmlh) As used in this section?
(1) the term ?actual sexually explicit conduct? means actual but not simulated conduct as defined in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of paragraph (2) of section 2256 of this title;
sexually explicit acts are defined in 2256 but as stated in 2257 simulated acts do not apply.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...6----000-.html(2)
(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), ?sexually explicit conduct? means actual or simulated?
(i) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
(ii) bestiality;
(iii) masturbation;
(iv) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(v) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;Comment
-
I have the good ones - add me on ICQ and Santa might have a Christmas gift - She was 18 at time of pictures ;)Comment
-
stev0: You need to get with the game son. One guy went to jail for CP because he filmed kids that were clothed!
Plus, with the administrative clarifications that were issued (not just what is on cornell law, I know the stuff well), you require 2257 documents for pretty much everything.
But hey, your a lawyer. You can explain it to the FBI when they come knocking on you door asking about the 17 year old nude model on your site.
Idiot.Comment
-
Yeah, we parents get a little more riled up when this shit happens. Sorry. Deal with it.
Ther are plenty of the exact same pics out there w/o the stars and a link to one here on GFY. PERSONALLY, if owned this board, I couldn't hit the delete fast enought JUST IN CASE.
Then again, I also don't think buying little boys cartoon underwear in the little boys section of the store and putting them on 18 year old models is OK either, but others says it's OK.
Playing is saft in the porn biz is not exactly a stupid decision. Ask Slick.Comment
-
Remember that age does not matter in highfashion.PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic
AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!Comment
-
From what I can tell, this was a warning from Alex to the monitors of the board. They are free to take whatever actions they want.Comment
-
Discussing a news topic and posting photos is completely different than selling them on a porn site. No one here is talking about selling it, they don't own the rights to the photos anyways. However i'd like to see the administrative clarifications you speak of, please cite a source.Comment
-
because not owning the rights to a picture has ever prevented somebody putting them on a 'celeb' siteComment
-
stev0: GFY sells adverting on this board. This is a commercial entity. You want to play that game, GFY has no right to post about 99.9% of the pictures that show up here.
My concern is GFY allowing the posting of a 17 year old nude or engaged in sexual situations (starred out or not), and also potentially that less than brilliant people (cough) will post the images on blogs or websites thinking they are free and clear because it is news. News or not, once you know she is 17 (her claim in the same media that isn't running the pics (CNN doesn't have them up)) you can't really run the images because they are nudes of a minor.
as for administrative clarifications, you must have spent the last 3 years with your head in the sand somewhere. Just start that the FSC site and go look. I ain't your legal assistant.Comment
-
I just don't get why anyone that worked in this industry would want anything associated with somebody legally underage anywhere near anything with their name on it.Comment
-
I'm pretty sure they don't host or post any of the photos that show up here.
Maybe you guys are looking at different photos.. I don't see any nudes, just a couple of flashing photos. You're right though, its all about context. Like minors appearing topless in movies (Thora Birch was 17 in American Beauty, lots of other actresses have too), it wasn't sexual.. it was just boobs.My concern is GFY allowing the posting of a 17 year old nude or engaged in sexual situations (starred out or not), and also potentially that less than brilliant people (cough) will post the images on blogs or websites thinking they are free and clear because it is news. News or not, once you know she is 17 (her claim in the same media that isn't running the pics (CNN doesn't have them up)) you can't really run the images because they are nudes of a minor.
I hadn't heard much about it recently, which is why I asked... figured there might have been something new.as for administrative clarifications, you must have spent the last 3 years with your head in the sand somewhere. Just start that the FSC site and go look. I ain't your legal assistant.Comment
-
Jesus Christ. 71 replies and nobody catches that it was NOT miss USA. She was miss NEVADA!!! You guys awake?
51-566-514 Comment
-
She's and another girl are licking each other's naked boobs. I'm not a prude (well, I am
) but posting pictures of lesbian boob licking action where at least one participant is 17 is just stooooopid.
And the link to the non-starred pics is posted here too.
Like I said, it's GFY's call, not mine. But I wouldn't be caught with that crap on my board - especially being so involved with Playboy.Comment
-
LOL yea that girl has porn written all over her. Whoever can snag her can ride the publicity all the way to the bank.Comment
-
watch out!
internet police in the house!Comment
-
That is fucking - young.Comment
-
17 and how many months? ;)
•
Sell Patches & Pills •Comment
-
Have you read the wording in the criminal code of the USA or Canada? Both contain wording such as "explicit nudity" and "sexualized" and the like. Images must have a specific obvious purpose, not implied but implicit. Intent of usage is mentioned as well.
Read Regina v. Sharpe sometime, it leaves no room for ambiguous clothed partial nudity photos with nothing blatantly sexualized. Maybe... just maybe, if those photos were displayed in an adult porn pay site and portrayed in a highly sexual way THEN they could be considered in violation. But that's not the case here, they are on message boards and news sites only, as far as I know of it.
And I can't believe you people would think that news agencies would be promoting CP anyway. It simply isn't CP, it's a bunch of photos of a 17 yr old acting a bit slutty, big deal.
The rest of you can argue all you want, but this is not CP. People need to learn what consitutes CP rather than give unqualified opinions about it.Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!
ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!
Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634Comment
-
I'm sure 17 yr old girls post much racier pics on their personal home pages and in their myspace pages all the time, but these particular ones are magically CP??
Noop, sorry.Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!
ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!
Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634Comment
-
Holy Shit, all day and nobody does the math? She said the pictures were taken 3 years ago. 22-3=19
Reps for Rees have issued a new statement admitting she was 19 at the time the photos were taken.
http://www.tmz.com/2006/12/21/naught...-of-her-title/
As always, good catch Alex.Comment
-
Custom Cartoon Mascots - ICQ: 243355699, Email: [email protected] or Click Sig - 15% referrals. Send me clients, make money!
Comment
-
She was 19 in the pics lolComment
-
Not to mention, people THOUGHT she was 17 when they posted the links. I guess no one cares these days as long as you'd "hit it", lol
Comment
-
she's fucking miss NEVADA... it just fits the title.Originally posted by rayadp05Comment
-
It's nice to bee young and hot.. Thanks for the pics
[Web Design | Development | Programming | Content Writing ]
ICQ: 238-890-469Comment
Comment