Need a CCProcessor that is not bitching around like CCbill

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vigilante
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2006
    • 696

    #1

    Need a CCProcessor that is not bitching around like CCbill

    ...

    for my site www.no-lolitas.com (alternativ: www.teenchubbys.com )


    THIS SITE IS IN NO WAY USED OR MENT TO ATTRACT THE UNDERAGE AUDIENCE Its just a fucking sitename.There are no lolita /underage keywords or something.

    But Ccbill refuses to allow this site for processing.

    I even offered them to remove all HTML traces(filenames, url etc) for the word Lolita as long as i can leave the logo pictures as they are ( so it would be impossible to find this site using SE for the term lolita in any way)


    So any CCProcessor around that is a little bit felxible?


    Clearance: I completly understand and support the default blacklisting of the term "lolita" but as i said in my case its a clearly visible anti lolita sitename and just! a sitename (without any searchable trace for that term or use of that term in any text)
  • SteveLightspeed
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2001
    • 7940

    #2
    What a fucking joke --- why didn't you just call your site "Child-porn-not-here.com"

    From the text on your site:
    "Ever searched for some "hot teens" on the web and all you found were these skinny, 12 year old looking lolita-imitates?"

    Think the search engines won't see "skinny, 12 year old looking lolita"???
    Last edited by SteveLightspeed; 12-20-2006, 05:47 PM.
    Abra-cadabra!

    Comment

    • Vigilante
      Confirmed User
      • Nov 2006
      • 696

      #3
      Because it´s the goddamn concept of the site.

      I could have it named anti-skinny-and-anti-young-looking-models-site.com but for some reason i thought that wouldn´t be a good domain ...


      or how would you name a project that is dedicated against the flood of skinny-schoolgirl looking model sites?
      Last edited by Vigilante; 12-20-2006, 05:48 PM.

      Comment

      • SteveLightspeed
        Confirmed User
        • Jul 2001
        • 7940

        #4
        "Click here if you DON'T not want this" --- gets a little confusing doesn't it?
        Abra-cadabra!

        Comment

        • SteveLightspeed
          Confirmed User
          • Jul 2001
          • 7940

          #5
          Originally posted by Vigilante
          Because it´s the goddamn concept of the site.

          I could have it named anti-skinny-and-anti-young-looking-models-site.com but for some reason i thought that wouldn´t be a good domain ...


          or how would you name a project that is dedicated against the flood of skinny-schoolgirl looking model sites?
          I call bullshit.

          Steve Lightspeed
          Abra-cadabra!

          Comment

          • Vigilante
            Confirmed User
            • Nov 2006
            • 696

            #6
            If you don´t like fat girls .. wouldn´t it be obvious to first visit the site www.no-fats.com ?

            Comment

            • MaDalton
              I am Amazing Content!
              • Feb 2004
              • 39861

              #7
              Originally posted by Vigilante
              Because it´s the goddamn concept of the site.

              I could have it named anti-skinny-and-anti-young-looking-models-site.com but for some reason i thought that wouldn´t be a good domain ...


              or how would you name a project that is dedicated against the flood of skinny-schoolgirl looking model sites?
              maybe your intentions were good - but the result is stupid. ccbill is completely right and no other processor will touch it either

              AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
              Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
              Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
              Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

              Comment

              • jact
                Confirmed User
                • Sep 2002
                • 9134

                #8
                Well, uhm, err.. I'd suggest spinning it a different way.
                Free agent

                Comment

                • BoyAlley
                  So Fucking Gay
                  • Nov 2004
                  • 19714

                  #9
                  You have got to be kidding?!?!?!?!

                  Comment

                  • SteveLightspeed
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jul 2001
                    • 7940

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Vigilante
                    Because it´s the goddamn concept of the site.

                    I could have it named anti-skinny-and-anti-young-looking-models-site.com but for some reason i thought that wouldn´t be a good domain ...


                    or how would you name a project that is dedicated against the flood of skinny-schoolgirl looking model sites?

                    You seem to have "www.teenchubbys.com" already, so why are you fighting to keep the lolita name AT ALL?

                    To blame CCbill for not wanting to touch this is really fucked up on YOUR PART. CCbill should be commended for it.
                    Abra-cadabra!

                    Comment

                    • Vigilante
                      Confirmed User
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 696

                      #11
                      yes teenchubbys is mine too but is not that remarkable as no-lolitas
                      Its because i would have the whole design to be changed again. Headers/banners/gallerys/buttons.....

                      With that definition the domain " no-legal-age-models.com" would go through the process but no-lolitas doesn´t ?


                      don´t want to fuck with anyone here but it fucking sucks when you have everything done and ready and no problems whatsover with anything and then the processor declines you because some graphics INCLUDE a badword(INA A NEGATIVE WAY)?
                      Last edited by Vigilante; 12-20-2006, 06:00 PM.

                      Comment

                      • SteveLightspeed
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jul 2001
                        • 7940

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Vigilante
                        yes teenchubbys is mine too but is not that remarkable as no-lolitas
                        Its because i would have the whole design to be changed again. Headers/banners/gallerys/buttons.....

                        With that definition the domain " no-legal-age-models.com" would go through the process but no-lolitas doesn´t ?


                        don´t want to fuck with anyone here but it fucking sucks when you have everything done and ready and no problems whatsover with anything and then the processor declines you because some graphics INCLUDE a badword(INA A NEGATIVE WAY)?
                        Maybe you should have learned the rules before you played the paysite game?
                        Abra-cadabra!

                        Comment

                        • Sly
                          Let's do some business!
                          • Sep 2004
                          • 31379

                          #13
                          Out of curiosity, is English your primary language?
                          Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted

                          Windows VPS now available
                          Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
                          Click here for more details.

                          Comment

                          • RawAlex
                            So Fucking Banned
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 9465

                            #14
                            When you saw "lolita" you should have been brilliant enough to ASK before spending the money to build the site.

                            Comment

                            • MaDalton
                              I am Amazing Content!
                              • Feb 2004
                              • 39861

                              #15
                              Originally posted by RawAlex
                              When you saw "lolita" you should have been brilliant enough to ASK before spending the money to build the site.
                              or maybe the designer should have said something
                              AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                              Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                              Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                              Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                              Comment

                              • Vigilante
                                Confirmed User
                                • Nov 2006
                                • 696

                                #16
                                Looks like the "rules" are to look at a blacklist and you´re done..

                                That´s what i am complaining about!

                                Where is the flexibility?

                                When someone would add the site " www.no-model-is-of-legal-age.com it would perfectly pass the blacklist test even if that name would be damn worse..

                                Comment

                                • Vigilante
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Nov 2006
                                  • 696

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Sly
                                  Out of curiosity, is English your primary language?
                                  obviously not

                                  Comment

                                  • MaDalton
                                    I am Amazing Content!
                                    • Feb 2004
                                    • 39861

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Vigilante
                                    Looks like the "rules" are to look at a blacklist and you´re done..

                                    That´s what i am complaining about!

                                    Where is the flexibility?

                                    When someone would add the site " www.no-model-is-of-legal-age.com it would perfectly pass the blacklist test even if that name would be damn worse..
                                    gibs auf
                                    AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                                    Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                                    Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                                    Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                                    Comment

                                    • Vigilante
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Nov 2006
                                      • 696

                                      #19
                                      scheissdreck verfluchter :-P

                                      Comment

                                      • Sly
                                        Let's do some business!
                                        • Sep 2004
                                        • 31379

                                        #20
                                        There is absolutely no need for "flexibility" in their regard. Where is your "flexibility"?

                                        Nobody wants unnecessary heat. You're creating unnecessary heat. Nobody in the US is going to process you, Visa would laugh.
                                        Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted

                                        Windows VPS now available
                                        Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
                                        Click here for more details.

                                        Comment

                                        • sweetums
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Feb 2003
                                          • 2534

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Vigilante
                                          yes teenchubbys is mine too but is not that remarkable as no-lolitas
                                          Its because i would have the whole design to be changed again. Headers/banners/gallerys/buttons.....

                                          With that definition the domain " no-legal-age-models.com" would go through the process but no-lolitas doesn´t ?


                                          don´t want to fuck with anyone here but it fucking sucks when you have everything done and ready and no problems whatsover with anything and then the processor declines you because some graphics INCLUDE a badword(INA A NEGATIVE WAY)?
                                          Why would you bother to build your site around a term that every reputable processor attempts to stay 10-feet away from? It's certainly not like that's a new policy that any of them have....

                                          And I highly doubt that the domain "no-legal-age-models.com" would be considered acceptable -- it's all about the connotations, and that one just raises red flags all around.
                                          ICQ: 114549321

                                          Comment

                                          • Sly
                                            Let's do some business!
                                            • Sep 2004
                                            • 31379

                                            #22
                                            I'm starting a new site, www.no-scat.com

                                            Anybody up for partnership?
                                            Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted

                                            Windows VPS now available
                                            Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
                                            Click here for more details.

                                            Comment

                                            • MaDalton
                                              I am Amazing Content!
                                              • Feb 2004
                                              • 39861

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Vigilante
                                              scheissdreck verfluchter :-P
                                              ich weiß

                                              aber keiner wird dein konzept als solches akzeptieren. das wort "lolita" allein ist das problem - weil die auchmaschinen darauf anspringen. auch wenn du es genau andersrum meinst. und da alle seiten von visa gecheckt werden, kann auch ccbill nix machen - selbst wenn die wollten.

                                              die andere domain ist doch prima - musst nur den header umbauen


                                              PS: ich hätte noch passenden content für dich - ;)))
                                              AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                                              Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                                              Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                                              Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                                              Comment

                                              • SomeCreep
                                                :glugglug
                                                • Mar 2003
                                                • 26118

                                                #24
                                                "No-lolitas", worst name ever. Change the name.

                                                Webair Hosting

                                                I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

                                                Comment

                                                • Vigilante
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Nov 2006
                                                  • 696

                                                  #25




                                                  enough now. close that i erase that fucking term

                                                  i really hope i will never have to read a comment again on Domain registrars or hosting companys that shut down sites because the models look underage because that is the same thing (playing with the fire ) like here ... hm no its even worse because that are real girls here its just a word but everybody greatly understands the anger of the owners of these "kiddy looking" sites.


                                                  some mod plz close here . everything is said



                                                  naja suchmaschiene würde nur die domain finden auf den seiten is ja nix was textliches was den namen erhält. naja was soll man machen. . wegen content meld ich mich mal ;)
                                                  Last edited by Vigilante; 12-20-2006, 06:14 PM.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • SteveLightspeed
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Jul 2001
                                                    • 7940

                                                    #26
                                                    Now that I think about it, I think you could really go far with the whole "anti" theme:

                                                    no-hot-chicks.com
                                                    no-quality.com
                                                    no-value.com

                                                    and your program could be called

                                                    not-profitable.com

                                                    and your marketing pitch can be "NO sales, NO rebills, and NO ethics!"
                                                    Abra-cadabra!

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Vigilante
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Nov 2006
                                                      • 696

                                                      #27
                                                      no brain... und jetzt klappe zu :-P

                                                      Comment

                                                      • gleem
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Jun 2001
                                                        • 5593

                                                        #28
                                                        how about:

                                                        no-I-never-get-processed.com

                                                        lol




                                                        Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                                                        Comment

                                                        • WebDork
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Jan 2002
                                                          • 402

                                                          #29
                                                          Just drop $8 for a new domain and move on ... Processors are anal about this kind of thing. www.cardsgate.com Im sure would process it ...
                                                          Video Ipod Porn Site with Affiliate Program. http://www.podies.com
                                                          Free 1:1 Adult Webmaster Banner Exchange.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • natkejs
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Jan 2003
                                                            • 1640

                                                            #30
                                                            this is a joke right?

                                                            Comment

                                                            • vvq
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Feb 2004
                                                              • 2732

                                                              #31
                                                              teenchubbys sounds much better. don't like ccbill policies, try another processor. but i don't think any are gonna touch a site with 'lolitas' in the domain. bad idea on your part.

                                                              SQUIRTING - LESBIAN SPANKING - TITTY FUCKING - WET PANTIES - MORE
                                                              We offer free hosting, your own designer (works for free), and unsaturated content for gallery and free site submitters. Just contact me! E-mail: [email protected]

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Yngwie
                                                                I am an Alien from space
                                                                • May 2003
                                                                • 11118

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by natkejs
                                                                this is a joke right?
                                                                I'm fucking hoping it is otherwise something is very wrong.

                                                                The fact that you have "no" before lolita means shit. You still have that in your domain and site title and other text on the site so that means that you will attract the sickos. Get it now? Didn't think so.

                                                                Let me ask you this. Why in the fuck did you think that this was a good name? Did you think that it would be like you taking a stand? Like you saying "I don't deal with or approve of underage girls so I will use lolita in my domain name and put no in front of it". Where's the sense in that? I can guarantee that IF you were to get processing for this site and it was live you would have people watching you and also keeping an eye on the processor. They don't care that you may not have "no lolitas" on the site. It's all in the name and the way you are promoting it.

                                                                for example

                                                                "Ever searched for some "hot teens" on the web and all you found were these skinny, 12 year old looking lolita-imitates?And then you searched for something "more"... some curves,some big ass,something chubby...you get these disgusting fat, ugly bitches? We decided to stop this mess and bring you the girls you want when you look for chubby girls!"

                                                                What the fuck were you thinking????
                                                                ICQ: 16544251 - Skype: gator37 @ eastlink.ca - email: yngwie @ isys.ca

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Webby
                                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                  • Oct 2002
                                                                  • 14956

                                                                  #33
                                                                  DUH???

                                                                  I just grabbed a load of "no kiddie porn" sites - gotta be a winner
                                                                  XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • SteveLightspeed
                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                    • Jul 2001
                                                                    • 7940

                                                                    #34
                                                                    "All girls on this site are older than 13 year olds, 14 year olds, 15 year olds, 16 year olds, AND 17year olds...."
                                                                    Abra-cadabra!

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • MaDalton
                                                                      I am Amazing Content!
                                                                      • Feb 2004
                                                                      • 39861

                                                                      #35
                                                                      give the guy a break - i think he's got it by now
                                                                      AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                                                                      Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                                                                      Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                                                                      Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Webby
                                                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                        • Oct 2002
                                                                        • 14956

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by SteveLightspeed
                                                                        "All girls on this site are older than 13 year olds, 14 year olds, 15 year olds, 16 year olds, AND 17year olds...."
                                                                        XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • BOSS1
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • Sep 2005
                                                                          • 4331

                                                                          #37
                                                                          i know one person who thinks like that

                                                                          NEW SITE: Stockings Kingdom
                                                                          Lesbians in Latex, Lesbians in Stockings, Granny Sex, BDSM Porn, Latex and Sex, Custom Foot Fetish, Femdom Movies and Kinky Porn Pass.
                                                                          300+ hosted flvs, 500+ hosted galleries, Page Peel ADs.. NATS export and payouts twice a month

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Yngwie
                                                                            I am an Alien from space
                                                                            • May 2003
                                                                            • 11118

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by MaDalton
                                                                            give the guy a break - i think he's got it by now
                                                                            if that was true he would have removed the text mentioned in this thread from the site.
                                                                            ICQ: 16544251 - Skype: gator37 @ eastlink.ca - email: yngwie @ isys.ca

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • Yngwie
                                                                              I am an Alien from space
                                                                              • May 2003
                                                                              • 11118

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by SteveLightspeed
                                                                              "All girls on this site are older than 13 year olds, 14 year olds, 15 year olds, 16 year olds, AND 17year olds...."

                                                                              now that takes the fucking cake.
                                                                              ICQ: 16544251 - Skype: gator37 @ eastlink.ca - email: yngwie @ isys.ca

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • SteveLightspeed
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Jul 2001
                                                                                • 7940

                                                                                #40
                                                                                This begs the question, if the word is so taboo, why do most sponsors turn a blind eye to www.lolitampegs.com ???
                                                                                Abra-cadabra!

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • cess
                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                  • Sep 2006
                                                                                  • 2921

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  lol...... thanks i needed a good laugh.

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • Yngwie
                                                                                    I am an Alien from space
                                                                                    • May 2003
                                                                                    • 11118

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Originally posted by SteveLightspeed
                                                                                    This begs the question, if the word is so taboo, why do most sponsors turn a blind eye to www.lolitampegs.com ???

                                                                                    that's a very good question. I know that if I was a sponsor I would not accept traffic from there. May be good traffic, but it's not worth the heat it can bring.
                                                                                    ICQ: 16544251 - Skype: gator37 @ eastlink.ca - email: yngwie @ isys.ca

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • Barefootsies
                                                                                      Choice is an Illusion
                                                                                      • Feb 2005
                                                                                      • 42635

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      Originally posted by SteveLightspeed
                                                                                      I call bullshit.

                                                                                      Steve Lightspeed
                                                                                      If I find out you did this...


                                                                                      ....I'm going to get you.

                                                                                      <puts on shades>
                                                                                      Should You Email Your Members?

                                                                                      Link1 | Link2 | Link3

                                                                                      Enough Said.

                                                                                      "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • Barefootsies
                                                                                        Choice is an Illusion
                                                                                        • Feb 2005
                                                                                        • 42635

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        Originally posted by MaDalton
                                                                                        maybe your intentions were good - but the result is stupid. ccbill is completely right and no other processor will touch it either

                                                                                        Correct.

                                                                                        Anyone with any sense knows not to use banned words on their site. Much less in a domain name.

                                                                                        Should You Email Your Members?

                                                                                        Link1 | Link2 | Link3

                                                                                        Enough Said.

                                                                                        "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Barefootsies
                                                                                          Choice is an Illusion
                                                                                          • Feb 2005
                                                                                          • 42635

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Originally posted by SteveLightspeed
                                                                                          Now that I think about it, I think you could really go far with the whole "anti" theme:

                                                                                          no-hot-chicks.com
                                                                                          no-quality.com
                                                                                          no-value.com

                                                                                          and your program could be called

                                                                                          not-profitable.com

                                                                                          and your marketing pitch can be "NO sales, NO rebills, and NO ethics!"
                                                                                          Should You Email Your Members?

                                                                                          Link1 | Link2 | Link3

                                                                                          Enough Said.

                                                                                          "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • bizarredollars
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Mar 2006
                                                                                            • 1582

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            I'm not going to get into a fucking argument here.. just change the damn site name, and ccbill will process it.. Nothing wrong with using teenchubby's.

                                                                                            [email protected]
                                                                                            icq: 205-252-550

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • bizarredollars
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • Mar 2006
                                                                                              • 1582

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              We all know using lolita in a site name is a no-no, and has been for a long time... if ccbill have blacklisted you, try one of the following.. they all have the same rules when it comes to blacklisted words however.

                                                                                              www.verotel.com
                                                                                              www.365billing.com
                                                                                              www.segpay.com
                                                                                              www.standardpay.com

                                                                                              Whatever, lolita in your site name will cause nothing but trouble.. concept or not, it rings alarm bells.. I did not even take a look at the site, because of that word.

                                                                                              [email protected]
                                                                                              icq: 205-252-550

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • bizarredollars
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Mar 2006
                                                                                                • 1582

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by SteveLightspeed
                                                                                                This begs the question, if the word is so taboo, why do most sponsors turn a blind eye to www.lolitampegs.com ???
                                                                                                I would not take traffic from that domain.

                                                                                                [email protected]
                                                                                                icq: 205-252-550

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • KGucci
                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                  • Jun 2004
                                                                                                  • 653

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  Originally posted by bizarredollars
                                                                                                  We all know using lolita in a site name is a no-no, and has been for a long time... if ccbill have blacklisted you, try one of the following.. they all have the same rules when it comes to blacklisted words however.


                                                                                                  www.segpay.com


                                                                                                  Whatever, lolita in your site name will cause nothing but trouble.. concept or not, it rings alarm bells.. I did not even take a look at the site, because of that word.
                                                                                                  You are correct! There is no processor that will accept such a site. If you do find one, please post it in this thread so webmasters can stay clear of them.

                                                                                                  If anyone has any questions regarding SegPay.com, please feel free to contact me directly.

                                                                                                  www.SegPay.com
                                                                                                  KGreer at SegPay dot com
                                                                                                  Skype: kgucci

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • corvette
                                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                                    • Oct 2001
                                                                                                    • 7880

                                                                                                    #50
                                                                                                    Missed this thread until now, cant see the site because it appears to no longer be a site, teenchubbys.com is down as well ?


                                                                                                    Originally posted by SteveLightspeed
                                                                                                    "All girls on this site are older than 13 year olds, 14 year olds, 15 year olds, 16 year olds, AND 17year olds...."
                                                                                                    i hope steve was joking about this?


                                                                                                    We are not flexible in the least with issues that affect our relationship with our banks, looks like the other posters in this thread explained that to you
                                                                                                    If you need a good company for check writing services, then check out checkissuing, and for webhosting, check out Phoenix NAP

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    Working...