DirectNic - SlicksNetwork Update !!!!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 5
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 template Next
  • will76
    Making $$$$ w/ ClickCash
    • May 2003
    • 18037
    #101
    Originally posted by sicone

    If Slick lays down and complies, every other registrar can quickly start doing the same thing and will use the reason of... 'direct NIC vs Slick'.
    that is 100% not true. The only thing this will affect will be Slick, and if he gives them what they are asking, likely the next person who is in his situation.

    Do you really think Godady is watching this saying " well if Slick gives it up, green light for us boys! we going to do it too." You under estimate that these companies have legal teams for a reason. Also, the FSC said that directnic has no chance. I am sure Godaddy's lawyers will tell them the same. I highly doubt another register will change their policy until this is tested by law.
    ICQ: 86364801 Email: will [at] innovativeassets [dot] com

    PROGRAM SHIT LIST - DO NOT PROMOTE (click link for gfy thread)
    FNCash | Media Revenue

      Comment

      • XPays
        Team Player
        • May 2004
        • 13002
        #102
        Originally posted by boneprone
        Evan, bad example I used there.. Im just so mind boggled here on whats going on..

        I know you guys would have our back.. You guys are great.
        Times are definitely changing and hope to meet you at Internext

        Perhaps this is a nice big window of opportunity to corner tgp sponsors for doc's. or, use fhg's ?? Whenever there is change, there is a ripe opportunity. Or am I just an optimist.... anyway, best of luck to all!
        InterNext Expo Domain Auction Live Now thru Feb 5
        HuntingMoon GFY Domains Marketplace is LIVE
        XPays always pays! Top Site: * RealJasmine.com * + HotelHeiress® with The Paris Hilton Sex Video
        Insert the HotelHeiress® HD FEED into your members areas
        XPin.com Opening for Pin Partners Soonish
        Mainstream Offers For Emailers and DomainersNONADULT.COM


        Like Us!

          Comment

          • will76
            Making $$$$ w/ ClickCash
            • May 2003
            • 18037
            #103
            Originally posted by jimthefiend
            God you're pathetic.


            Dude I can find 50 bitches who look 17 with just a half hours browsing on that POS cam site you promote. How the FUCK is that any different?



            Just die Will. Please.
            Jesus you are a fucking moron. Do you understand what is going on here? Listen closely moron, now I know why you reply back with comments like ' you are retarted". When you actually try to make an argument you prove you dont know what the fuck you are talking about.

            Jimmie, Slick is using nude content that he got from his sponsor on his site.

            You search ifriends.net and say you see girls that look 17 and then say " how is that any different".

            There is a huge difference. The content is no on my site. I am not hosting the images. Do you fucking understand the difference of hosting images and having them on your site?
            ICQ: 86364801 Email: will [at] innovativeassets [dot] com

            PROGRAM SHIT LIST - DO NOT PROMOTE (click link for gfy thread)
            FNCash | Media Revenue

              Comment

              • Carrie
                Confirmed User
                • Apr 2002
                • 3162
                #104
                Originally posted by Nookster
                DirectNIC HAS NO JURISDICTION IN ASKING FOR PICTURE ID'S. If they think a certain site/image is questionable, they need to report it to the proper authorities (the FBI and/or the DOJ) PERIOD.
                They are doing this drama bullshit for sig views.
                READ THE FUCKING LAWS PEOPLE!
                How about instead of yelling at people what you *think* is right, YOU go do some reading...
                Here, I'll help.

                This is section 9 of DirectNic's Terms of Service, a legal and binding contract to which Slick agreed when he registered his domains with them:
                #9 CONTENT OBTAINED WITHOUT RELIABLE CONSENT.

                1. You agree that if we determine that your use of our Services or System is in any way connected or affiliated with the display, promotion, or dissemination of content obtained without reliable consent from each participant-e.g., sexual or nude images involving children under the age of 18, bestiality, murder, rape-we may charge your account a penalty in the amount of US $1,000.00 for every domain name in violation of this section. You further agree that we may collect these penalties by any means we deem necessary, including but not limited to charging any credit card you have on file with us or auctioning your domains.
                2. You agree that we reserve the right to immediately discontinue your use of our Services or System and seize control of your account(s) and all domain names within your account(s) immediately and without notice to you upon a determination that you have violated this section. You further agree that if you fail to pay us any penalties assessed under this section, we may auction off any and all of the domain names within your account(s) to satisfy your debt to us.
                3. You agree that we may take all necessary steps to investigate, document, and report any findings that you have violated this section, including but not limited to disclosing your account information to any and all appropriate law enforcement agencies.
                Right there is your "jurisdiction" - it's simple contract law. Agreed to by both parties involved in this situation.

                  Comment

                  • will76
                    Making $$$$ w/ ClickCash
                    • May 2003
                    • 18037
                    #105
                    Originally posted by Yngwie
                    you have to understand that the precedent that they will set will be that every other registrar will follow what they did and in the end it will become a HUGE legal disaster. Is it that hard to see that? 1 big fish does it and the rest think it's the way to go. So now they are ALL doing it. They all get so many complaints, lawyers involed, fbi etc.. Ya, that'll be so much fun. And in 98% of the case it will be due to FALSE complaints just to cripple the competition.
                    there is NO WAY that will happen. The others would wait for directnic to be eventually sued and then wait to see what happens in court. While they are waiting for them to be sued they would accept all of the people leaving directnic and make more money from them. It's not like slick gives in then tomorrow godaddy and everyone else is going to do the same thing. Please see my post a few up about this.

                    NO WAY that happens.
                    Last edited by will76; 12-13-2006, 05:58 PM.
                    ICQ: 86364801 Email: will [at] innovativeassets [dot] com

                    PROGRAM SHIT LIST - DO NOT PROMOTE (click link for gfy thread)
                    FNCash | Media Revenue

                      Comment

                      • Matt 26z
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Apr 2002
                        • 18481
                        #106
                        Originally posted by Yngwie
                        I'm also curious as to how exactly it affects THEM (DN) if someone has CP on a domain that was bought from DN? #1. DN is NOT hosting the shit. #2. They are just a registrar and not responsible for the content of someone's website(s). So how can they be held liable for any of this?
                        For the same reason processors can be held liable for processing CP sites that people have made them aware of.

                          Comment

                          • Rochard
                            Jägermeister Test Pilot
                            • Dec 2001
                            • 75761
                            #107
                            I'm confused here. Model IDs on their own prove nothing other than the date of birth of the model amd the age of the model currently. Without the date of production you cannot prove how old the model was when the content was shot.

                            I should note that all ICS records include dates of production.
                            Herschel Savage
                            Brooklyn, NY

                              Comment

                              • Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE
                                North Coast Pimp
                                • Dec 2005
                                • 9395
                                #108
                                ALot of great points made here......

                                  Comment

                                  • SmokeyTheBear
                                    ►SouthOfHeaven
                                    • Jun 2004
                                    • 28609
                                    #109
                                    slick tell your attorney i would also like a copy of the models id's , home phone number and panties color please..

                                    OR ELSE


























                                    i will ask someone else
                                    hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                      Comment

                                      • directfiesta
                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                        • Oct 2002
                                        • 30178
                                        #110
                                        Originally posted by Rochard
                                        I'm confused here. Model IDs on their own prove nothing other than the date of birth of the model amd the age of the model currently. Without the date of production you cannot prove how old the model was when the content was shot.

                                        I should note that all ICS records include dates of production.
                                        you are 100 % correct .

                                        But also, it is not the registrar business... to enforce a law such as 2257 ( after all, this is what it is about ).
                                        I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                                        But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                                          Comment

                                          • Nookster
                                            Confirmed IT Professional
                                            • Nov 2005
                                            • 3744
                                            #111
                                            Originally posted by Carrie
                                            How about instead of yelling at people what you *think* is right, YOU go do some reading...
                                            Here, I'll help.

                                            This is section 9 of DirectNic's Terms of Service, a legal and binding contract to which Slick agreed when he registered his domains with them:


                                            Right there is your "jurisdiction" - it's simple contract law. Agreed to by both parties involved in this situation.
                                            Well, maybe you should look into the laws. You are not obligated to give ANYONE access to the documents unless they are acting in behalf of the DOJ and/or the FBI.
                                            It seems that DirectNIC's TOS VIOLATES FEDERAL LAW!
                                            They have no fucking jurisdiction. Now STFU.
                                            The Best Affiliate Software, Ever.

                                              Comment

                                              • Slick
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Feb 2001
                                                • 7338
                                                #112
                                                Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                                slick tell your attorney i would also like a copy of the models id's , home phone number and panties color please..

                                                OR ELSE


                                                i will ask someone else
                                                ROFL, ha ha ha, ok, I'll get that info for ya

                                                  Comment

                                                  • madawgz
                                                    8.8.8.8
                                                    • Mar 2006
                                                    • 30509
                                                    #113
                                                    directnic is one of the worst registars...ever since they took one of my domains in 2000....
                                                    TAEMDLRMSKRJIXMRLSMRJ.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Rochard
                                                        Jägermeister Test Pilot
                                                        • Dec 2001
                                                        • 75761
                                                        #114
                                                        Originally posted by Nookster
                                                        Well, maybe you should look into the laws. You are not obligated to give ANYONE access to the documents unless they are acting in behalf of the DOJ and/or the FBI.
                                                        It seems that DirectNIC's TOS VIOLATES FEDERAL LAW!
                                                        They have no fucking jurisdiction. Now STFU.
                                                        Is this really a violation of Federal law? Is there a Federal law in the US that says you cannot legally hand over such documents? I know the UK has such a law; In fact, the UK laws conflict with the US 2257 laws.

                                                        At the same time, if someone reported this to DirecNic, are they not legally obligated to report it? Perhaps we should consider ourselves lucky that DirectNic didn't just file a report with local law enforcement......

                                                        I admit it's an odd situation. I'm wondering why DirectNic is so concerned about this.
                                                        Herschel Savage
                                                        Brooklyn, NY

                                                          Comment

                                                          • directfiesta
                                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                            • Oct 2002
                                                            • 30178
                                                            #115
                                                            Originally posted by Rochard

                                                            At the same time, if someone reported this to DirecNic, are they not legally obligated to report it? Perhaps we should consider ourselves lucky that DirectNic didn't just file a report with local law enforcement......

                                                            I admit it's an odd situation. I'm wondering why DirectNic is so concerned about this.
                                                            I find very questionable that a " somebody " reported possible CP to DirectNic...
                                                            Much more plausible would be a competitor that did that ... I know of nobody in my family that even know that registrars exists...

                                                            DirectNic should have reported it to the authorities, if they felt that there was a crime being commited...

                                                            If I think that, in the house across the street, a crime is being commited ( CP, house invasion. etc ...) I will not do my own investigation; I will call 911 !

                                                            I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                                                            But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Pleasurepays
                                                                BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                                                                • Aug 2002
                                                                • 11913
                                                                #116
                                                                Originally posted by sicone
                                                                How is he going to comply. How many sponsors do you think are actually going to just hand over this info to any affiliate much less some non government entity.
                                                                he is already supposed to have this documentation as per current laws. saying "i can't comply" is like saying "DOJ, FBI, please come arrest me now"

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Pleasurepays
                                                                    BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                                                                    • Aug 2002
                                                                    • 11913
                                                                    #117
                                                                    Originally posted by Rochard
                                                                    Is this really a violation of Federal law? Is there a Federal law in the US that says you cannot legally hand over such documents? I know the UK has such a law; In fact, the UK laws conflict with the US 2257 laws.

                                                                    At the same time, if someone reported this to DirecNic, are they not legally obligated to report it? Perhaps we should consider ourselves lucky that DirectNic didn't just file a report with local law enforcement......

                                                                    I admit it's an odd situation. I'm wondering why DirectNic is so concerned about this.
                                                                    well... the turd above you is confused and the fact of the matter is that "2257" should have never been used in any of these conversations because they were simply asking for proof of age of the models in question - pic/date of birth on an official ID.

                                                                    it seems logical to me that asking for the info has absolutely nothing to do with federal privacy law from DirectNIC's standpoint... giving that info out is where you would most likely get into trouble. i can ask you to land your helicopter on the white house lawn. ... you can choose to do it. i won't be the one getting gang raped in the prison shower that evening.

                                                                    as far as i know... US privacy laws have zero to do with foreign citizens. if you were from the UK and i demanded the ID's with all personally identifiable info of your neighbors and you gave it to me, it would be you that gets in trouble in the UK for breaking UK laws... not me for asking for it in the US.

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Nookster
                                                                        Confirmed IT Professional
                                                                        • Nov 2005
                                                                        • 3744
                                                                        #118
                                                                        Originally posted by Rochard
                                                                        Is this really a violation of Federal law? Is there a Federal law in the US that says you cannot legally hand over such documents? I know the UK has such a law; In fact, the UK laws conflict with the US 2257 laws.

                                                                        At the same time, if someone reported this to DirecNic, are they not legally obligated to report it? Perhaps we should consider ourselves lucky that DirectNic didn't just file a report with local law enforcement......

                                                                        I admit it's an odd situation. I'm wondering why DirectNic is so concerned about this.
                                                                        Well, from my and my attorney's understandings, yes it is a clear violation...as you or only required to give access to the documents "to the Office of the United States Attorney General, or his designated representative, or as otherwise required by a governmental authority of competent jurisdiction pursuant to valid process."

                                                                        By DirectNIC asking to physically see the documents they are impersonating those officials...and I believe impersonating a government official holds a minimum of 10 years in prison.

                                                                        Now, we're not for certain that it's a "clear violation" to access the documents if you are not gov. officials, BUT by trying to force someone to give them access IS clearly impersonating a government official (as only government officials have the right to do so).
                                                                        The Best Affiliate Software, Ever.

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Pleasurepays
                                                                            BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                                                                            • Aug 2002
                                                                            • 11913
                                                                            #119
                                                                            Originally posted by will76
                                                                            There is a huge difference. The content is no on my site. I am not hosting the images. Do you fucking understand the difference of hosting images and having them on your site?
                                                                            i think you are mistaken. the current 2257 legislation takes that into full account and as a secondary producer, you are liable for what is shown on your pages.



                                                                            (2) A secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles,
                                                                            manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book,
                                                                            magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digitally- or computer-
                                                                            manipulated image, picture, or other matter intended for commercial
                                                                            distribution that contains a visual depiction of an actual human being
                                                                            engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct, or who inserts on a
                                                                            computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the
                                                                            sexually explicit content of a computer site or service that contains a
                                                                            visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually
                                                                            explicit conduct, including any person who enters into a contract,
                                                                            agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • CDSmith
                                                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                • May 2001
                                                                                • 51460
                                                                                #120
                                                                                Originally posted by Pleasurepays
                                                                                well... the turd above you is confused and the fact of the matter is that "2257" should have never been used in any of these conversations because they were simply asking for proof of age of the models in question - pic/date of birth on an official ID.
                                                                                Sadly, the directfiesta's of the world will never understand simple concisely written concepts like this one.
                                                                                Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

                                                                                ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!
                                                                                Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket.                                                                                 ICQ me at: 31024634

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • lucky1
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • Sep 2005
                                                                                    • 309
                                                                                    #121
                                                                                    As wrong as I think DN is for playing 2257 inspector, I think Slick should just give them the 14 blacked out ids. If he doesn't and they turn this over to government authorities he is fucked. He obviously does not have 2257 docs and with the recent change in 2257 to basically make anyone who uploads a sexually explicit picture to the "series of tubes" a porn producer he will be in violation of 2257.

                                                                                    Do not kid yourself, there will be no "precedent set". This is GFY and while it is a pretty popular place I don't think that all the major registrars are hanging on every word of this "case". If this went to court and the case did not settle before a judgment then there would be a "legal precedent" set and that is the only thing that matters.

                                                                                    The major points to learn from all this are.

                                                                                    1. Have 2257 docs for all sexually explicit content you host.
                                                                                    -forget about DN what if the DOJ wanted to see the docs?

                                                                                    2. If you have "questionable content" on your site you are the 1st target and need to expect problems.
                                                                                    -Personally I stay away from anything teen related, but that is a moral decision (which has nothing to do with this) and because I just don't want to be on the front line when the nuts in the country decide to throw everyone related to porn in jail because they don't like it.

                                                                                    3. Everyone on GFY has an opinion and someone will always disagree with it - even mine.
                                                                                    -Think about what you would do if you were in Slicks situation. Would you want the heat on you if you knew that you didn't have the docs required by law
                                                                                    -
                                                                                    See sig --->

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • wyldblyss
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Nov 2003
                                                                                        • 5779
                                                                                        #122
                                                                                        Ok, read over the 3 pages of this thread, and maybe I missed it so I am going to bring this up.

                                                                                        *Someone* unknown to anyone but directnic makes a complaint of CP on slicks site(s). Directnic feels it necessary to lock up his domains until he provided 2257 docs to the company so they can examine them. Slicks lawyer then contacts them and they reply saying they only need the docs on the first 14 images.

                                                                                        Did I get that right? Ok, follow me here.

                                                                                        If you are *really* investigating a website/company/person for CP do you stop at 14 images? What if the 15th image is CP?

                                                                                        Since they are taking on the responsibility of determining there is no CP, why stop at 14 images? I assume that this person has a TGP script in place, with rotating galleries...so he has maybe 50,000 plus galleries? Why not insist that documentation is required to be sent to them for all 50,000 galleries? After all, the images that were on the page when the complaint was made are not the images on the page now because they rotate.

                                                                                        Why stop there though? Why not just make every sponsor hand over the ID's to every single model they have hosted galleries for?

                                                                                        Now I am not a lawyer, but I wonder if they have directnic has really thought about what they are getting themselves into. What if they do this to another guy, request the "first 14" and it ends up the site is full of CP except for those 14 thumbs. What happens when the guy is caught by the feds and find out that "directnic" had a complaint about CP, did not give the complaint to the authorities, but instead took it upon themselves to demand the documentation on a micro-fraction of the models to verify they were legal.

                                                                                        -OR-

                                                                                        directnic is given documentation on a model, accepts it as proof of age, and it turns out the model was NOT legal...that the id was fake. The FBI's have a means of looking up to see if docs are real, directnic doesn't

                                                                                        Honestly, if directnic wants to be a hero, heavily donation to organizations actively involved in the prevention of CP and the aprehension and conviction of those sicko's and report any sites they feel may contain CP.

                                                                                        There is a fine I believe for not reporting it, if they "investigate" a site, deem it "ok" and it ends up there WAS CP on it, then I believe directnic would be liable.

                                                                                        However, if they recieved a complaint, notified authorities and let those trained to handle such matters deal with it, then they are in the clear.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • JOHNNY_BUTTHOLES
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Jun 2006
                                                                                            • 146
                                                                                            #123
                                                                                            Originally posted by will76
                                                                                            that is 100% not true. The only thing this will affect will be Slick, and if he gives them what they are asking, likely the next person who is in his situation.

                                                                                            Do you really think Godady is watching this saying " well if Slick gives it up, green light for us boys! we going to do it too." You under estimate that these companies have legal teams for a reason. Also, the FSC said that directnic has no chance. I am sure Godaddy's lawyers will tell them the same. I highly doubt another register will change their policy until this is tested by law.
                                                                                            you can bet your ass this is going to become very standard. the power didn't show its force through the DOJ, it showed it through 'the registars'.

                                                                                            if this grows and more and more registrars demand photo ID on more and more thumb, this is going to turn into a huge clusterfuck with the registrar owning the domain in the end,

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • Pleasurepays
                                                                                                BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                                                                                                • Aug 2002
                                                                                                • 11913
                                                                                                #124
                                                                                                Originally posted by Nookster
                                                                                                Well, from my and my attorney's understandings, yes it is a clear violation...as you or only required to give access to the documents "to the Office of the United States Attorney General, or his designated representative, or as otherwise required by a governmental authority of competent jurisdiction pursuant to valid process."

                                                                                                By DirectNIC asking to physically see the documents they are impersonating those officials...and I believe impersonating a government official holds a minimum of 10 years in prison.

                                                                                                Now, we're not for certain that it's a "clear violation" to access the documents if you are not gov. officials, BUT by trying to force someone to give them access IS clearly impersonating a government official (as only government officials have the right to do so).
                                                                                                they are not conducting an inspection of records as described in 18 U.S.C. 2257 you dumbass. whether or not they are violating that law is not in question... they simply asked to see proof of age for 14 models.

                                                                                                fire your attorney... he sucks and if what you call deductive reasoning led you and your "attorney" to the conclusion that they are impersonating govenment officials, you need to wrap yourself in pillows, put a helmet on and never leave the house again to protect yourself and others.

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • directfiesta
                                                                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                                    • Oct 2002
                                                                                                    • 30178
                                                                                                    #125
                                                                                                    Originally posted by CDSmith
                                                                                                    Sadly, the directfiesta's of the world will never understand simple concisely written concepts like this one.


                                                                                                    read the whole thread .... and all the threads.
                                                                                                    I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                                                                                                    But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                      • TampaToker
                                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                                        • May 2006
                                                                                                        • 5828
                                                                                                        #126
                                                                                                        Does anyone know if Directnic turned this complaint over to the fbi or were they willing to work with the webmaster first?
                                                                                                        Icq 247-742-205

                                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                                          • webmasterchecks
                                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                                            • Oct 2006
                                                                                                            • 1685
                                                                                                            #127
                                                                                                            Here is what happened

                                                                                                            Directnic got notified about some possible underage content domains they are the registar for. They had to due their due-diligence in order to feel comfortable that their client did not have something illegal on that domain. Somebody over there decided to lock the domain and send a poorly-worded notice to slick asking specifically for the 2257 information (which nobody but the attorney general has any right to ask for), when they should have asked for some sort of proof of age on the content, if slick could not provide it, they would 86 him from their system and maybe report him to the National Center, customs or the fbi, depending on his location. If he was willing and able to provide it, no big deal

                                                                                                            Then he posted this and it was the Big Issue of the day on the boards and directnic realizes that all of their movements are going to be scrutinized in the public eye, so they are going to tread very carefully. They have no interest in losing any business over a decision by somebody that was probably a little overboard and are now looking to save face and quietly put this matter behind them.
                                                                                                            Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

                                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                                              • Yngwie
                                                                                                                I am an Alien from space
                                                                                                                • May 2003
                                                                                                                • 11118
                                                                                                                #128
                                                                                                                Originally posted by Matt 26z
                                                                                                                For the same reason processors can be held liable for processing CP sites that people have made them aware of.
                                                                                                                ya, but processors are actually making it so a person can buy a membership on the site.

                                                                                                                I was just thinking out loud so all of what I said may be completely wrong, but some of it may be right. Who knows.
                                                                                                                ICQ: 16544251 - Skype: gator37 @ eastlink.ca - email: yngwie @ isys.ca

                                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                                  • Yngwie
                                                                                                                    I am an Alien from space
                                                                                                                    • May 2003
                                                                                                                    • 11118
                                                                                                                    #129
                                                                                                                    Originally posted by will76
                                                                                                                    there is NO WAY that will happen. The others would wait for directnic to be eventually sued and then wait to see what happens in court. While they are waiting for them to be sued they would accept all of the people leaving directnic and make more money from them. It's not like slick gives in then tomorrow godaddy and everyone else is going to do the same thing. Please see my post a few up about this.

                                                                                                                    NO WAY that happens.

                                                                                                                    I was just thinking out loud so obviously I wasn't stating a fact It could happen. Not right away, but later in the future anything is possible.
                                                                                                                    ICQ: 16544251 - Skype: gator37 @ eastlink.ca - email: yngwie @ isys.ca

                                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                                      • gleem
                                                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                                                        • Jun 2001
                                                                                                                        • 5593
                                                                                                                        #130
                                                                                                                        hey slick, I really would stop posting here till this is over and done with, can't believe your lawyer didn't advise this.




                                                                                                                        Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                                                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                                                          • TampaToker
                                                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                                                            • May 2006
                                                                                                                            • 5828
                                                                                                                            #131
                                                                                                                            Originally posted by gleem
                                                                                                                            hey slick, I really would stop posting here till this is over and done with, can't believe your lawyer didn't advise this.
                                                                                                                            Best advice so far
                                                                                                                            Icq 247-742-205

                                                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                                                              • Slick
                                                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                • Feb 2001
                                                                                                                                • 7338
                                                                                                                                #132
                                                                                                                                Yeah, maybe you're right

                                                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                                                  • gleem
                                                                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                    • Jun 2001
                                                                                                                                    • 5593
                                                                                                                                    #133
                                                                                                                                    Originally posted by Slick
                                                                                                                                    Yeah, maybe you're right
                                                                                                                                    trust me, I am.. stick to instant messengers like AIM/ICQ, everything you post here becomes public record and will fuck you in the end if you ever end up in court. You can always burn your Hardrive, but I doubt lensman will let you burn GFY ;)




                                                                                                                                    Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                                                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                                                      • RawAlex
                                                                                                                                        So Fucking Banned
                                                                                                                                        • Oct 2003
                                                                                                                                        • 9465
                                                                                                                                        #134
                                                                                                                                        gleem, IM is worse... because there are two copies (yours and theirs) plus you have no idea if the IM traffic is filtered in the middle.

                                                                                                                                        You might as well stand in a large room and yell stuff to each other.

                                                                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                                                                          • DateDoc
                                                                                                                                            Outside looking in.
                                                                                                                                            • Feb 2005
                                                                                                                                            • 14243
                                                                                                                                            #135
                                                                                                                                            I'd give them what they want so you get to keep the domains. While you may be the guinea pig in what they are trying to do you have to protect your income first and foremost. Once you have done that you can decide whether or not to transfer the domains. In the mean time I'd give no hint to anyone as to what you intend to do as far as a registrar as it is not in your best interest at the moment.

                                                                                                                                            As a member of GFY I thank you for sharing your troubles and the ongoing issues in this dilemma. I am sure it has shown a lot of us what we need to do in order to best protect ourselves.

                                                                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                                                                              • CDSmith
                                                                                                                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                                                                                • May 2001
                                                                                                                                                • 51460
                                                                                                                                                #136
                                                                                                                                                Originally posted by directfiesta


                                                                                                                                                read the whole thread .... and all the threads.
                                                                                                                                                Trust me I have read every word in every thread on this from the start of it, and you look just as foolish in all of them.

                                                                                                                                                Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

                                                                                                                                                ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!
                                                                                                                                                Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket.                                                                                                                                                 ICQ me at: 31024634

                                                                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                                                                  • Corona
                                                                                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                                    • Feb 2002
                                                                                                                                                    • 2185
                                                                                                                                                    #137
                                                                                                                                                    Regardless of how this turns out DirectNic has lost my business forever.

                                                                                                                                                    Who are the best registers out there?
                                                                                                                                                    I was looking for a job, and then I found a job
                                                                                                                                                    And heaven knows I'm miserable now

                                                                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                                                                      • directfiesta
                                                                                                                                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                                                                                        • Oct 2002
                                                                                                                                                        • 30178
                                                                                                                                                        #138
                                                                                                                                                        Originally posted by CDSmith
                                                                                                                                                        Trust me I have read every word in every thread on this from the start of it, and you look just as foolish in all of them.

                                                                                                                                                        I wouldn't trust you , even with BoyAlley's dick ... you are an asshole.
                                                                                                                                                        I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                                                                                                                                                        But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                                                                                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                                                                                          • Pleasurepays
                                                                                                                                                            BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                                                                                                                                                            • Aug 2002
                                                                                                                                                            • 11913
                                                                                                                                                            #139
                                                                                                                                                            Originally posted by directfiesta
                                                                                                                                                            I wouldn't trust you , even with BoyAlley's dick ... you are an asshole.
                                                                                                                                                            suddenly i'm curious to know how you connected honesty and the cock of another man who is the most flamboyant homosexual to ever post on this forum.

                                                                                                                                                            did someone hurt you recently? feelings not returned? did he promise to call the next day and didn't?

                                                                                                                                                            weirdo.

                                                                                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                                                                                              • sarettah
                                                                                                                                                                see you later, I'm gone
                                                                                                                                                                • Oct 2002
                                                                                                                                                                • 14349
                                                                                                                                                                #140
                                                                                                                                                                Originally posted by Rochard
                                                                                                                                                                Is this really a violation of Federal law? Is there a Federal law in the US that says you cannot legally hand over such documents? I know the UK has such a law; In fact, the UK laws conflict with the US 2257 laws.

                                                                                                                                                                At the same time, if someone reported this to DirecNic, are they not legally obligated to report it? Perhaps we should consider ourselves lucky that DirectNic didn't just file a report with local law enforcement......

                                                                                                                                                                I admit it's an odd situation. I'm wondering why DirectNic is so concerned about this.
                                                                                                                                                                Looks to me like DN probably got a call from someone. From the 3rd link on the first row of majorpervert:



                                                                                                                                                                Translation:
                                                                                                                                                                According to Section 235 of the Danish Criminal Code it is a criminal offence to disseminate, possess or for a payment to become acquainted with child pornography. The maximum penalty can in certain cases be imprisonment for up to 6 years.

                                                                                                                                                                The National High Tech Crime Center of the Danish National Police, who assist in investigations into crime on the internet, has informed Cybercity, that the internet page which your browser has tried to get in contact with may contain material which could be regarded as child pornography.

                                                                                                                                                                Upon the request of The National High Tech Crime Center of the Danish National Police Cybercity has blocked the access to the internet page. If you have any objections against the internet page being blocked, please contact Cybercity.

                                                                                                                                                                Information on criminal conduct on the internet may be passed on to the National High Tech Crime Center of the Danish National Police.
                                                                                                                                                                Last edited by sarettah; 12-13-2006, 09:26 PM.
                                                                                                                                                                All cookies cleared!

                                                                                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                                                                                  • sicone
                                                                                                                                                                    Retired
                                                                                                                                                                    • Jan 2004
                                                                                                                                                                    • 18453
                                                                                                                                                                    #141
                                                                                                                                                                    Originally posted by Pleasurepays
                                                                                                                                                                    he is already supposed to have this documentation as per current laws. saying "i can't comply" is like saying "DOJ, FBI, please come arrest me now"
                                                                                                                                                                    No he doesn't, not by the law that is on the books and not held up by a injunction.

                                                                                                                                                                    At this point in time he is a secondary producer and protected by Sundance vs Reno

                                                                                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                                                                                      • Slick
                                                                                                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                                                        • Feb 2001
                                                                                                                                                                        • 7338
                                                                                                                                                                        #142
                                                                                                                                                                        Originally posted by sarettah
                                                                                                                                                                        Looks to me like DN probably got a call from someone. From the 3rd link on the first row of majorpervert:



                                                                                                                                                                        Translation:
                                                                                                                                                                        According to Section 235 of the Danish Criminal Code it is a criminal offence to disseminate, possess or for a payment to become acquainted with child pornography. The maximum penalty can in certain cases be imprisonment for up to 6 years.

                                                                                                                                                                        The National High Tech Crime Center of the Danish National Police, who assist in investigations into crime on the internet, has informed Cybercity, that the internet page which your browser has tried to get in contact with may contain material which could be regarded as child pornography.

                                                                                                                                                                        Upon the request of The National High Tech Crime Center of the Danish National Police Cybercity has blocked the access to the internet page. If you have any objections against the internet page being blocked, please contact Cybercity.

                                                                                                                                                                        Information on criminal conduct on the internet may be passed on to the National High Tech Crime Center of the Danish National Police.
                                                                                                                                                                        That's actually not from a gallery of mine, if you look at the url in there, that's a link to a trade of mine. The strange thing is, when I go to that site, it loads up fine http://young-and-virgin.com/

                                                                                                                                                                        Perhaps if Danish Police are seeing reason to put that message up there when you go to it, I should get rid of the trade, and I did just delete it.
                                                                                                                                                                        Last edited by Slick; 12-13-2006, 09:38 PM.

                                                                                                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                                                                                                          • gleem
                                                                                                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                                                            • Jun 2001
                                                                                                                                                                            • 5593
                                                                                                                                                                            #143
                                                                                                                                                                            Originally posted by RawAlex
                                                                                                                                                                            gleem, IM is worse... because there are two copies (yours and theirs) plus you have no idea if the IM traffic is filtered in the middle.

                                                                                                                                                                            You might as well stand in a large room and yell stuff to each other.
                                                                                                                                                                            hmmm, I guess I took off my tinfoil hat too soon.



                                                                                                                                                                            seriously though the # of eyeballs looking at your IM's is less than the ones viewing a huge PUBLIC message board filled with Feds and other agencies taking notes.




                                                                                                                                                                            Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                                                                                                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                                                                                                              • Mutt
                                                                                                                                                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                                                                                                                • Sep 2002
                                                                                                                                                                                • 34431
                                                                                                                                                                                #144
                                                                                                                                                                                i'd have more sympathy for Slick if he wasn't trading traffic with so many child pornographers. what do we call people in this biz we trade traffic with? PARTNERS!

                                                                                                                                                                                almost all decent solo girl teen programs have a strict policy they won't accept traffic from any site with underagers on them - why should teen free site owners be any different?
                                                                                                                                                                                I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

                                                                                                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                  • gleem
                                                                                                                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                                                                    • Jun 2001
                                                                                                                                                                                    • 5593
                                                                                                                                                                                    #145
                                                                                                                                                                                    we are a society of "victims" and this industry is no different Mutt.

                                                                                                                                                                                    Was he trading with CP sites? I don't know, I didn't see if he was or not, but if he was guess he's learning his lesson, if he was but didn't know it, now he knows why it's important to watch everything that you do with your sites.




                                                                                                                                                                                    Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                                                                                                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                      • Pleasurepays
                                                                                                                                                                                        BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                                                                                                                                                                                        • Aug 2002
                                                                                                                                                                                        • 11913
                                                                                                                                                                                        #146
                                                                                                                                                                                        Originally posted by sicone
                                                                                                                                                                                        No he doesn't, not by the law that is on the books and not held up by a injunction.

                                                                                                                                                                                        At this point in time he is a secondary producer and protected by Sundance vs Reno
                                                                                                                                                                                        injunction? ... do you live under a rock? can you explain the details of the injuction you are referring to and who it protects and how? apparently, i have everything backwards.

                                                                                                                                                                                        Sundance vs Reno... ummm... you lose. this was addressed by the DOJ in their comments and they said it will not stop them from coming after people and is not applicable. Believing it is or isn't is irrelevant if its not going to stop them from arresting you and destroying your business. He is a secondary producer by law and it is under that law that he can go to jail. End of story.

                                                                                                                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                          • borked
                                                                                                                                                                                            Totally Borked
                                                                                                                                                                                            • Feb 2005
                                                                                                                                                                                            • 6284
                                                                                                                                                                                            #147
                                                                                                                                                                                            Originally posted by Rochard
                                                                                                                                                                                            Is this really a violation of Federal law? Is there a Federal law in the US that says you cannot legally hand over such documents? I know the UK has such a law; In fact, the UK laws conflict with the US 2257 laws.

                                                                                                                                                                                            At the same time, if someone reported this to DirecNic, are they not legally obligated to report it? Perhaps we should consider ourselves lucky that DirectNic didn't just file a report with local law enforcement......

                                                                                                                                                                                            I admit it's an odd situation. I'm wondering why DirectNic is so concerned about this.
                                                                                                                                                                                            Rochard,

                                                                                                                                                                                            This was my point when asking Mike to clarify in his thread (to which he never replied).
                                                                                                                                                                                            It is *much* wider than the UK - the UK laws on privacy are taken directly from EU laws, which are that you cannot disclose this information to a 3rd party under any circumstance. Hell, even storing the data is a right royal pain in the arse; it's possible but the hoops you have to jump through to get permission is a nightmare.

                                                                                                                                                                                            For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
                                                                                                                                                                                            (consider figuring out the email as test #1)


                                                                                                                                                                                            All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202

                                                                                                                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                              • bizman2960
                                                                                                                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                                                                                • Nov 2006
                                                                                                                                                                                                • 358
                                                                                                                                                                                                #148
                                                                                                                                                                                                DirectNic's lawyers sounds like pussies.
                                                                                                                                                                                                The Young Sluts!!!
                                                                                                                                                                                                BizMan2960 at gmail.com :: ICQ 486-450-912

                                                                                                                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                                  • borked
                                                                                                                                                                                                    Totally Borked
                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Feb 2005
                                                                                                                                                                                                    • 6284
                                                                                                                                                                                                    #149
                                                                                                                                                                                                    ...next on the bandwagon: DNS providers

                                                                                                                                                                                                    For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
                                                                                                                                                                                                    (consider figuring out the email as test #1)


                                                                                                                                                                                                    All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202

                                                                                                                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                                      • borked
                                                                                                                                                                                                        Totally Borked
                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Feb 2005
                                                                                                                                                                                                        • 6284
                                                                                                                                                                                                        #150
                                                                                                                                                                                                        Originally posted by will76
                                                                                                                                                                                                        I *think* you would have to wait till AFTER damages have occured. Like if he did not comply with their requests and they shut his sites down, and he lost " x " amount of money. I think all he could sue them for at this point is attorney fees, unless he can prove some other damages have occured. Since no one is saying bad things about him I don't think he can prove any type of defemation.
                                                                                                                                                                                                        Just a visit to the GP complaining of stress and depression would sort that out.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
                                                                                                                                                                                                        (consider figuring out the email as test #1)


                                                                                                                                                                                                        All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202

                                                                                                                                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                                          Previous 1 2 3 4 5 template Next
                                                                                                                                                                                                          Working...