Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent 488
no. a simple question that no one can answer.
would not a parent whose child died due their negligence feel more guilty that one whose child died due to an act of god?
of course both would be devastated, but would not one be more so?
|
You are supposing many things in your argument and it is a loaded question.
However, for the basis of your question. If my child died or was injured and I had the ability to have prevented it, yes I would have regrets over not choosing the other path. BTW... the flu in your instance could easily be defined as an act of god rather than a negligent act. There is no guarantee a flu "vaccine" (which is a misnomer in and of itself) would fully prevent an infection.
However, that does not mean the path is clear prior to the supposed incident. As they say, hindsight is always 20/20.