Mods Inside - False Accusation of Child Porn Production

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Agent 488
    Registered User
    • Feb 2006
    • 22511

    #1

    Mods Inside - False Accusation of Child Porn Production

    darkjedi accuses the owner of christina-model.com of producing child porn:

    http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=682183

    when even a cursory examination discovers that the owner of christina model is sam parker of pwe:

    "In compliance with the Federal Labeling and Record-Keeping Law (also known as 18 U.S.C. 2257), all models located within our domain were 18 years of age or older during the time of photography.

    All models proof of age is held by the custodian of records, which is listed below organized by producer.

    All content and images are in full compliance with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 2257 and associated regulations."
    Custodian of Records
    Sam Parker
    PWE
    381 Casa Linda Plaza 114 pmb
    Dallas, Texas 75218-3423
    U.S.A.

    [email protected]

    sam parker is based in texas and not associated with webe web or any of their photographers (based in alabama) as can be seen if one actually reads http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=76820

    whois for christina-model.com:

    Registrant:
    PWE
    381 CASA LINDA PLZ
    DALLAS, TX 75218
    US

    Domain Name: CHRISTINA-MODEL.COM

    Administrative Contact , Technical Contact :
    PWE
    [email protected]
    381 CASA LINDA PLZ
    DALLAS, TX 75218
    US
    Phone: 800-778-9880

    and grabbing a webe domain from one in the gfy thread:

    Registrant:
    webe web corp
    po box 480027
    fort lauderdale, fl 33348
    US

    Registrar: DOTSTER
    Domain Name: HOPE-MODEL.COM
    Created on: 23-DEC-04
    Expires on: 23-DEC-06
    Last Updated on: 03-DEC-05

    Administrative Contact:

    ,
    [email protected]
    webe web corp
    po box 480027
    fort lauderdale, fl 33348
    US
    954 567 2922
  • polish_aristocrat
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Jul 2002
    • 40377

    #2
    ban him !
    I don't use ICQ anymore.

    Comment

    • edgeprod
      Permanently Gone
      • Mar 2004
      • 10019

      #3
      Man, it's amazing you'd have the balls to complain about ANY accusation someone has leveled at someone else, after all the shit you threw OUR way, and I never said SHIT to you about.

      Comment

      • edgeprod
        Permanently Gone
        • Mar 2004
        • 10019

        #4
        But yeah, I'll second PA's recommendation, because you DO have a valid point, despite the glass-house thing.

        Comment

        • scottybuzz
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • May 2006
          • 14799

          #5
          YES, Dark Jedi should be BANNED.
          $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$

          Comment

          • DarkJedi
            No Refunds Issued.
            • Feb 2001
            • 28301

            #6
            Originally posted by budsbabes
            darkjedi accuses the owner of christina-model.com of producing child porn:

            http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=682183

            when even a cursory examination discovers that the owner of christina model is sam parker of pwe:

            "In compliance with the Federal Labeling and Record-Keeping Law (also known as 18 U.S.C. 2257), all models located within our domain were 18 years of age or older during the time of photography.

            All models proof of age is held by the custodian of records, which is listed below organized by producer.

            All content and images are in full compliance with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 2257 and associated regulations."
            Custodian of Records
            Sam Parker
            PWE
            381 Casa Linda Plaza 114 pmb
            Dallas, Texas 75218-3423
            U.S.A.

            [email protected]

            sam parker is based in texas and not associated with webe web or any of their photographers (based in alabama) as can be seen if one actually reads http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=76820

            whois for christina-model.com:

            Registrant:
            PWE
            381 CASA LINDA PLZ
            DALLAS, TX 75218
            US

            Domain Name: CHRISTINA-MODEL.COM

            Administrative Contact , Technical Contact :
            PWE
            [email protected]
            381 CASA LINDA PLZ
            DALLAS, TX 75218
            US
            Phone: 800-778-9880

            and grabbing a webe domain from one in the gfy thread:

            Registrant:
            webe web corp
            po box 480027
            fort lauderdale, fl 33348
            US

            Registrar: DOTSTER
            Domain Name: HOPE-MODEL.COM
            Created on: 23-DEC-04
            Expires on: 23-DEC-06
            Last Updated on: 03-DEC-05

            Administrative Contact:

            ,
            [email protected]
            webe web corp
            po box 480027
            fort lauderdale, fl 33348
            US
            954 567 2922
            the whois is a front for the christina-model.com site

            they have 277 docs now, but thet started it when she was 16

            oh and you are a troll

            Comment

            • Agent 488
              Registered User
              • Feb 2006
              • 22511

              #7
              Originally posted by DarkJedi
              the whois is a front for the christina-model.com site

              they have 277 docs now, but thet started it when she was 16

              oh and you are a troll
              prove it.

              Comment

              • RawAlex
                So Fucking Banned
                • Oct 2003
                • 9465

                #8
                Simple math:

                What is the model's current age?

                When did the website open?

                Let's say the site has been up for 4 years. Let's say the model is currently 19. You can figure out the rest. Not saying those are the numbers for this situation, but there you go.

                Comment

                • DarkJedi
                  No Refunds Issued.
                  • Feb 2001
                  • 28301

                  #9
                  Originally posted by budsbabes
                  prove it.
                  how can i prove it, you want me to post ID scans of christina-model.com owner?

                  LOL

                  Comment

                  • Agent 488
                    Registered User
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 22511

                    #10
                    Originally posted by RawAlex
                    Simple math:

                    What is the model's current age?

                    When did the website open?

                    Let's say the site has been up for 4 years. Let's say the model is currently 19. You can figure out the rest. Not saying those are the numbers for this situation, but there you go.
                    i think the fact that the name, location, whois and legal is completely different as well as christina-model's website is still online while the other's are not shows that something is amiss with darkjedi's serious accusations.

                    Comment

                    • RawAlex
                      So Fucking Banned
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 9465

                      #11
                      Record created on 22-Aug-2001

                      On that basis, either (a) Christina is now, what, 23... or perhaps she is 20 which would put her start age at, hmm....

                      Anyone want to comment?

                      Comment

                      • Agent 488
                        Registered User
                        • Feb 2006
                        • 22511

                        #12
                        Originally posted by DarkJedi
                        how can i prove it, you want me to post ID scans of christina-model.com owner?

                        LOL
                        do you always accuse innocent people of being indicted under child porn laws?

                        odd hobby.

                        Comment

                        • edgeprod
                          Permanently Gone
                          • Mar 2004
                          • 10019

                          #13
                          Originally posted by budsbabes
                          prove it.
                          They have a robots.txt blocking the Internet Archive, so unless someone thought to take a screenshot of an "About Me" from back in the day with 16 on it (which I doubt), it's probably not possible.

                          And .. without evidence, the accusation is, of couse ... a bannable offense.

                          Comment

                          • DutchTeenCash
                            I like Dutch Girls
                            • Feb 2003
                            • 21684

                            #14
                            right well we can close this thread too

                            what a joke, just cause the url looks alike

                            ICQ 16 91 547 - SKYPE dutchteencash
                            bob AT dutchteencash DOT com
                            ... did you see our newest Sweet Natural Girl Priscilla (18)?

                            Comment

                            • Agent 488
                              Registered User
                              • Feb 2006
                              • 22511

                              #15
                              Originally posted by RawAlex
                              Record created on 22-Aug-2001

                              On that basis, either (a) Christina is now, what, 23... or perhaps she is 20 which would put her start age at, hmm....

                              Anyone want to comment?
                              when christina model started modelling isn't an issue - an issue for a different time perhaps - just bringing up the point that the onwer of that site isn't one of those who were indicted in florida and alabama or cp production.

                              Comment

                              • bareskin
                                Confirmed User
                                • Nov 2006
                                • 619

                                #16
                                I'm just gonna step out now gye
                                Globat.com hosting company has shitty customer service skills :: please be advised::

                                Icq# 394599740

                                Comment

                                • RawAlex
                                  So Fucking Banned
                                  • Oct 2003
                                  • 9465

                                  #17
                                  budsbabes, I agree that this appears unrelated to the other issue.

                                  It also doesn't change the case that Christina-model may have started this before she was 18, which ain't a good thing. Two wrongs don't make a right.

                                  Comment

                                  • DarkJedi
                                    No Refunds Issued.
                                    • Feb 2001
                                    • 28301

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by edgeprod
                                    They have a robots.txt blocking the Internet Archive, so unless someone thought to take a screenshot of an "About Me" from back in the day with 16 on it (which I doubt), it's probably not possible.

                                    And .. without evidence, the accusation is, of couse ... a bannable offense.
                                    it's been discussed here before

                                    https://www.gofuckyourself.com/showp...2&postcount=33

                                    Comment

                                    • Agent 488
                                      Registered User
                                      • Feb 2006
                                      • 22511

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by DarkJedi
                                      when christina model started modelling is a separate issue -

                                      you accused the owner of that website to have been indicted for producing child porn in FL as per the article you posted. address that.

                                      Comment

                                      • DarkJedi
                                        No Refunds Issued.
                                        • Feb 2001
                                        • 28301

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by budsbabes
                                        when christina model started modelling is a separate issue -

                                        you accused the owner of that website to have been indicted for producing child porn in FL as per the article you posted. address that.
                                        I guess you're right.
                                        I shouldn've posted it without complete proof.
                                        I apologise if i was wrong.

                                        Comment

                                        • QuaWee
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Jul 2004
                                          • 5791

                                          #21
                                          lol, he's about to get banned.
                                          i luv mainstream

                                          Comment

                                          • edgeprod
                                            Permanently Gone
                                            • Mar 2004
                                            • 10019

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by QuaWee
                                            lol, he's about to get banned.
                                            Wet dreams, you're calling my name.

                                            Comment

                                            • jimthefiend
                                              So Fucking Banned
                                              • Oct 2003
                                              • 18889

                                              #23
                                              Please God tell me they banned him.

                                              Comment

                                              • DarkJedi
                                                No Refunds Issued.
                                                • Feb 2001
                                                • 28301

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by jimthefiend
                                                Please God tell me they banned him.

                                                Comment

                                                • Agent 488
                                                  Registered User
                                                  • Feb 2006
                                                  • 22511

                                                  #25
                                                  i guess you can falsely accuse people of producing child porn around here with no consequences - interesting.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • edgeprod
                                                    Permanently Gone
                                                    • Mar 2004
                                                    • 10019

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by budsbabes
                                                    i guess you can falsely accuse people of producing child porn around here with no consequences - interesting.
                                                    History has shown us that isn't the case.

                                                    More likely, it either doesn't qualify under the rules for what he SPECIFICALLY did, or the mods haveb't seen it yet.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • jacked
                                                      sperm tail
                                                      • May 2004
                                                      • 11019

                                                      #27
                                                      didn't her site start out as a NN site before she was 18 and then when she turned 18 they started doing nudies...?
                                                      Got Cam Models?
                                                      icq: 361-607-616

                                                      Comment

                                                      • SmokeyTheBear
                                                        ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                        • Jun 2004
                                                        • 28609

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by edgeprod
                                                        History has shown us that isn't the case.

                                                        More likely, it either doesn't qualify under the rules for what he SPECIFICALLY did, or the mods haveb't seen it yet.
                                                        actually heh i hate to disagree with you but history on gfy as far as cp allegations dont correlate with bannings..

                                                        A mod has seen it and locked the thread. I assume if they were going to ban him they would have already done so..

                                                        The lesson once again is "oh well do what you want here arent many consequences " : its a real shame, while i do understand where darkjedi was coming from , he did wrong , he lied , gfy needs to make hard rules and stand by them. This issues has been broached before and gfy mods claimed there was no wiggle room when it comes to cp allegations.. Now all you have to do is appoligize. they dont even erase the thread, thats pretty classless..
                                                        hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                        Comment

                                                        • edgeprod
                                                          Permanently Gone
                                                          • Mar 2004
                                                          • 10019

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                                          actually heh i hate to disagree with you but history on gfy as far as cp allegations dont correlate with bannings..
                                                          And I hate to disagree with YOU, smokester, but he didn't mention bannings.

                                                          He mentioned "consequences."

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Agent 488
                                                            Registered User
                                                            • Feb 2006
                                                            • 22511

                                                            #30
                                                            i'm sure the owner of christina-model will take it more seriously.

                                                            Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                                            actually heh i hate to disagree with you but history on gfy as far as cp allegations dont correlate with bannings..

                                                            A mod has seen it and locked the thread. I assume if they were going to ban him they would have already done so..

                                                            The lesson once again is "oh well do what you want here arent many consequences " : its a real shame, while i do understand where darkjedi was coming from , he did wrong , he lied , gfy needs to make hard rules and stand by them. This issues has been broached before and gfy mods claimed there was no wiggle room when it comes to cp allegations.. Now all you have to do is appoligize. they dont even erase the thread, thats pretty classless..

                                                            Comment

                                                            • pocketkangaroo
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Jan 2005
                                                              • 8452

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by budsbabes
                                                              i guess you can falsely accuse people of producing child porn around here with no consequences - interesting.
                                                              Only if you bring in page views.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • DarkJedi
                                                                No Refunds Issued.
                                                                • Feb 2001
                                                                • 28301

                                                                #32
                                                                stop whining girls, i apologized.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • will76
                                                                  Making $$$$ w/ ClickCash
                                                                  • May 2003
                                                                  • 18037

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                                                  actually heh i hate to disagree with you but history on gfy as far as cp allegations dont correlate with bannings..

                                                                  A mod has seen it and locked the thread. I assume if they were going to ban him they would have already done so..

                                                                  The lesson once again is "oh well do what you want here arent many consequences " : its a real shame, while i do understand where darkjedi was coming from , he did wrong , he lied , gfy needs to make hard rules and stand by them. This issues has been broached before and gfy mods claimed there was no wiggle room when it comes to cp allegations.. Now all you have to do is appoligize. they dont even erase the thread, thats pretty classless..
                                                                  It all depends on who you accuse.

                                                                  You guys do realize that girls who own websites lie about their age. I once worked with a girl who was 23 for like 5 years, Finally when she really turned 30 she bumped her age on her site to 24. If a girl has been online for 4 years and still claiming to be 18 on her site it is very likely she is still trying to tap into the teen market and isn't ready to move on to the 20 something crowd. I don't know the details of this situation, but this is just a little fyi in general.
                                                                  ICQ: 86364801 Email: will [at] innovativeassets [dot] com

                                                                  PROGRAM SHIT LIST - DO NOT PROMOTE (click link for gfy thread)
                                                                  FNCash | Media Revenue

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Tempest
                                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                    • May 2004
                                                                    • 10217

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by budsbabes
                                                                    i'm sure the owner of christina-model will take it more seriously.
                                                                    Why are you supporting the owner of that site, who most people with a brain, feel has been "pimpin" that girl in sexy clothes and poses etc. on the net long before she turned 18?

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • Eric
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Dec 2000
                                                                      • 8818

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Thread has been moved to a safe place where no one can see it. We save these threads in case of legal action and someone needs the thread as a reference. DarkJedi was told to apologize, based on the fact that his information was incorrect. The thread was left in the main forum for him to be able to see this. He has apologized end of story.
                                                                      No One

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Agent 488
                                                                        Registered User
                                                                        • Feb 2006
                                                                        • 22511

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by Tempest
                                                                        Why are you supporting the owner of that site, who most people with a brain, feel has been "pimpin" that girl in sexy clothes and poses etc. on the net long before she turned 18?
                                                                        i'm not "supporting" anyone - and of course i'm against cp - i don't know the history of christina-model aside from i just looked at her site and found she has her 2257 docs -

                                                                        don't change the subject -

                                                                        the issue is that darkjedi accused a guy of being convicted of cp who obviously wasn't -

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • jacked
                                                                          sperm tail
                                                                          • May 2004
                                                                          • 11019

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by budsbabes
                                                                          i'm not "supporting" anyone - and of course i'm against cp - i don't know the history of christina-model aside from i just looked at her site and found she has her 2257 docs
                                                                          i have nothing against the owner of the site but why block archives.org from indexing the site then, unless he didn't want anyone to see the "risky" content that was posted in the past on that site, not that he was posting nudes of her at that age but the site was still filled with provocative poses of her before she was 18.

                                                                          anyway back to work let you guys figure this one out
                                                                          Got Cam Models?
                                                                          icq: 361-607-616

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE
                                                                            MOBILE PORN: IMOBILEPORN
                                                                            • Jan 2004
                                                                            • 16502

                                                                            #38
                                                                            just ban him and make the place a much better forum

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • SmokeyTheBear
                                                                              ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                                              • Jun 2004
                                                                              • 28609

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by Captain Tender Thighs
                                                                              Thread has been moved to a safe place where no one can see it. We save these threads in case of legal action and someone needs the thread as a reference. DarkJedi was told to apologize, based on the fact that his information was incorrect. The thread was left in the main forum for him to be able to see this. He has apologized end of story.
                                                                              as long as the se's cant get to it , i understand the position your in just wanted to make sure it is locked away tight , its always sad to see these things hit the se's without proper explanation
                                                                              hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • scottybuzz
                                                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                • May 2006
                                                                                • 14799

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Originally posted by Captain Tender Thighs
                                                                                Thread has been moved to a safe place where no one can see it. We save these threads in case of legal action and someone needs the thread as a reference. DarkJedi was told to apologize, based on the fact that his information was incorrect. The thread was left in the main forum for him to be able to see this. He has apologized end of story.
                                                                                did he apologise to the owners of chirstina model or to the crowds of gfy??
                                                                                $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • DutchTeenCash
                                                                                  I like Dutch Girls
                                                                                  • Feb 2003
                                                                                  • 21684

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Originally posted by scottybuzz
                                                                                  did he apologise to the owners of chirstina model or to the crowds of gfy??
                                                                                  gfy only offcourse - did you really think he had some kinda integrity ?

                                                                                  ICQ 16 91 547 - SKYPE dutchteencash
                                                                                  bob AT dutchteencash DOT com
                                                                                  ... did you see our newest Sweet Natural Girl Priscilla (18)?

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  Working...