View Single Post
Old 10-06-2009, 04:42 PM  
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 64,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw View Post
Its not really a stretch. Here's some info on the Ray Guhn case in 2006... all those charges you just mentioned ... Ray Guhn was charged with them for operating CumOnHerFace.com in Florida.

http://www.sptimes.com/2006/06/26/St...en_charg.shtml

And here's a quote from an article written by Q. Boyer for YNOT.com on the Ray Guhn case that occurred in 2006.



Same issue in AZ, shoe horning prostitution into creation of erotic material - there's a good First Amendment challenge to his charges.
i'm quite familiar with the ray guhn case. the article you linked left out some crucial details.
here are some-
Quote:
Specifically, in addition to the allegations of distribution of obscene material, the allegations involved a few of the performers claiming they had been provided controlled substances by one or more of the named defendants, that the use of escorts to make these films was legally prostitution and the mere payment of adult to perform sexual acts was a violation of Florida's prostitution law. Most of these same performers have pending RICO charges alleged against them for their involvement in escorting services in Pensacola that will not be resolved until after the resolution of this case.
not to mention it was in dade county, i believe. i'm sure you are aware of the risks of producing porn in that region.

so i am not sure that case can really establish precedence for a blanket statement re: pron production in arizona.

that being said, we all know there's only one place where it's legal to shoot porn. not to mention the risks involved in flying talent to arizona for pron production. but those do not apply in this case.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote