Any one done live broadcast on the net in HD ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jay23
    Confirmed User
    • Jun 2003
    • 1444

    #1

    Any one done live broadcast on the net in HD ?

    What encoder did you use ?

    Jay
  • MaDalton
    I am Amazing Content!
    • Feb 2004
    • 39861

    #2
    www.flatfeecams.com does that for example and they use windows media
    AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
    Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
    Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
    Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

    Comment

    • jay23
      Confirmed User
      • Jun 2003
      • 1444

      #3
      Originally posted by MaDalton
      www.flatfeecams.com does that for example and they use windows media
      Its actually Flash. The quality is good, not real HD but close.

      Comment

      • MaDalton
        I am Amazing Content!
        • Feb 2004
        • 39861

        #4
        Originally posted by jay23
        Its actually Flash. The quality is good, not real HD but close.
        well, it used to be windows until a few weeks ago, but i can't check from here since CZ is blocked. at least at that time it was 1280x720 at 1.5 mbit. better than any other cam signal i have seen so far. if you know any better please let me know
        AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
        Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
        Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
        Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

        Comment

        • jay23
          Confirmed User
          • Jun 2003
          • 1444

          #5
          Originally posted by MaDalton
          well, it used to be windows until a few weeks ago, but i can't check from here since CZ is blocked. at least at that time it was 1280x720 at 1.5 mbit. better than any other cam signal i have seen so far. if you know any better please let me know
          I was in Prague last week :-)

          Any ways we are working on a HD based system so trying to find out what out their in the market.

          Jay

          Comment

          • eroticsexxx
            Confirmed User
            • Aug 2006
            • 3133

            #6
            My company can do it, but each source studio would need symmetrical fiber-optic connectivity (better reliability) and a specific machine set-up that we provide. (Or we can setup the source machine remotely once specification requirements are met)

            We also setup the necessary datacenter clusters, based upon the number of your potential customers.

            Costs can be pretty high using some of the content delivery companies out there, but we have maximized efficiency for cost.

            We (obviously) have seen a significantly reduced demand as of late for such high streaming specs.

            The platform that we have used successfully for such high requirements is Windows Media based (rolled out on Windows Server 2003 and 2008).

            Comment

            • TheLegacy
              SEO RobertWarrenSEO.com
              • Apr 2003
              • 18144

              #7
              Talk to the folks at http://www.2much.net

              RobertWarrenSEO.com
              Telegram: @TheLegacy54

              Comment

              • jay23
                Confirmed User
                • Jun 2003
                • 1444

                #8
                Dont you have a high latency issue on WMV ?




                Originally posted by eroticsexxx
                My company can do it, but each source studio would need symmetrical fiber-optic connectivity (better reliability) and a specific machine set-up that we provide. (Or we can setup the source machine remotely once specification requirements are met)

                We also setup the necessary datacenter clusters, based upon the number of your potential customers.

                Costs can be pretty high using some of the content delivery companies out there, but we have maximized efficiency for cost.

                We (obviously) have seen a significantly reduced demand as of late for such high streaming specs.

                The platform that we have used successfully for such high requirements is Windows Media based (rolled out on Windows Server 2003 and 2008).

                Comment

                • eroticsexxx
                  Confirmed User
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 3133

                  #9
                  Originally posted by jay23
                  Dont you have a high latency issue on WMV ?
                  For default configurations that can be an issue, but Windows Media services includes features such as Fast Start and the complete elimination of a buffer time.

                  There are ways to customize the server configuration that will ensure immediate delivery of video content.

                  I've noticed that the other solutions offered are all webcam-based services, is that what you are looking for in particular?

                  Comment

                  • jay23
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jun 2003
                    • 1444

                    #10
                    Originally posted by eroticsexxx
                    For default configurations that can be an issue, but Windows Media services includes features such as Fast Start and the complete elimination of a buffer time.

                    There are ways to customize the server configuration that will ensure immediate delivery of video content.

                    I've noticed that the other solutions offered are all webcam-based services, is that what you are looking for in particular?
                    I have been working with WMS for all most 8 years and never get to less then 2 sec latency.

                    Jay

                    Comment

                    • eroticsexxx
                      Confirmed User
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 3133

                      #11
                      Originally posted by jay23
                      I have been working with WMS for all most 8 years and never get to less then 2 sec latency.

                      Jay
                      That's significant indeed, but should have been resolved somewhat with WMS9. What kind of configs were you working with?

                      It isn't impossible to get latency levels below that, but much tweaking will have to be done involving the codecs, you will have to use http streaming (lowest latency through the elimination of rollover from RTSP->MMS-http) and the environmental variables have to be impeccable in regards to your clients.

                      I'm presently testing out Expression encoder, which has support for true HD content streaming. By the end of this month we should be ready to deploy.

                      Comment

                      • jay23
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 1444

                        #12
                        Originally posted by eroticsexxx
                        That's significant indeed, but should have been resolved somewhat with WMS9. What kind of configs were you working with?

                        It isn't impossible to get latency levels below that, but much tweaking will have to be done involving the codecs, you will have to use http streaming (lowest latency through the elimination of rollover from RTSP->MMS-http) and the environmental variables have to be impeccable in regards to your clients.

                        I'm presently testing out Expression encoder, which has support for true HD content streaming. By the end of this month we should be ready to deploy.
                        I am playing with an encoder from Inlet , still no sub 2 sec value. I will keep you posted. My email is jay @ objectcube.com . Since we both seem to be trying to do the same we should keep in touch.

                        jay

                        Comment

                        Working...