NationalNet acquires equity stake in Executive Stats

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SweetT
    Shank-A-Potamus
    • Jan 2002
    • 1756

    #51
    Connectz... Wow, this sure struck a nerve with you, huh? Why did this partnership touch such a nerve with you? I am curious who you are but I guess it does not really matter. Your points are not stupid, by any means, but do seem quite targeted and inflammatory. Let me see if I can help you to understand......

    First, the reason that this deal is in place is two fold. One, NatNet is making a major push into the mainstream world where our Sales Reps are required to carry a "tool box". This means that most customers want a one-stop shop for their hosting, credit card processing, shopping cart software, affiliate management, etc. They want it all to integrate with no issues. I have always felt that if I were going to put the NatNet name onto anything I wanted to have at least some control over the day to day operations. With our new company, Executive Stats, Inc, we will be based here in Atlanta and our programmers are here in Atlanta. We have had the staffing in place for this venture for months. We may out-source some mundane tasks like adding sites to the program or small tasks like that, but the programming is being done by a team that was hired to do just that from my office in Atlanta, Georgia.

    Second, as for Brad and SIC, he said above that he always felt that ES could be much bigger than it has been if there were more tools available and that is what he liked about hooking it up with NatNet.

    I am going to assume that you are really a good guy and just expressing your opinion without having all of the facts. Maybe now you will see that this is not anything like what you thought. If not, however, and you are interested in talking to me further feel free to call me anytime. My phone number is on every single page on http://www.nationalnet.com and I will make myself available to you anytime to answer your questions. I think you will find that this was a good decision for both parties.

    Hope this helps.


    --T

    Comment

    • connectz
      Registered User
      • Aug 2006
      • 99

      #52
      Originally posted by sextoyking
      oh now you have to spout our racial comments, what a tough guy!!!!

      1. I am not African American

      2. I am Jewish and white, so please come back with some stupid comments that relate to me personally.

      3. Your a loser and a troll with an agenda..
      What a dumb fucking kike - is that better?

      I loved natnet until this.

      That's my agenda...and money. I don't make money from hosting.

      Comment

      • sextoyking
        Confirmed User
        • Dec 2001
        • 6034

        #53
        Originally posted by connectz
        What a dumb fucking kike - is that better?

        I loved natnet until this.

        That's my agenda...and money. I don't make money from hosting.


        As I thought - your not man enought to be gracious... but you don't mind the fake nics.


        Sorry Tony and Brad for turning your cool Announcement into a piss thread.
        ICQ: 52344098
        --------------------------------------
        50% Commissions on all Product Sales. http://www.wishing.com/money

        Comment

        • connectz
          Registered User
          • Aug 2006
          • 99

          #54
          Originally posted by SweetT
          Connectz... Wow, this sure struck a nerve with you, huh? Why did this partnership touch such a nerve with you? I am curious who you are but I guess it does not really matter. Your points are not stupid, by any means, but do seem quite targeted and inflammatory. Let me see if I can help you to understand......

          First, the reason that this deal is in place is two fold. One, NatNet is making a major push into the mainstream world where our Sales Reps are required to carry a "tool box". This means that most customers want a one-stop shop for their hosting, credit card processing, shopping cart software, affiliate management, etc. They want it all to integrate with no issues. I have always felt that if I were going to put the NatNet name onto anything I wanted to have at least some control over the day to day operations. With our new company, Executive Stats, Inc, we will be based here in Atlanta and our programmers are here in Atlanta. We have had the staffing in place for this venture for months. We may out-source some mundane tasks like adding sites to the program or small tasks like that, but the programming is being done by a team that was hired to do just that from my office in Atlanta, Georgia.

          Second, as for Brad and SIC, he said above that he always felt that ES could be much bigger than it has been if there were more tools available and that is what he liked about hooking it up with NatNet.

          I am going to assume that you are really a good guy and just expressing your opinion without having all of the facts. Maybe now you will see that this is not anything like what you thought. If not, however, and you are interested in talking to me further feel free to call me anytime. My phone number is on every single page on http://www.nationalnet.com and I will make myself available to you anytime to answer your questions. I think you will find that this was a good decision for both parties.

          Hope this helps.


          --T
          I've gotta run so I wont' have the time to type out an adequate response right now, when I actually have time to read what you wrote.

          I don't have an agenda...I've always considered you and a couple others at the top of the tier when it came to integrity.

          Time isn't permitting now...I'll post tomorrow.

          Comment

          • gregtx
            Confirmed User
            • Jan 2002
            • 1929

            #55
            Connetz, i'm not sure where the annomosity comes from or why there is a beef with any parties involved.. but if there is something that has been done in the past or present that I can possibly fix or do something about please contact me personally and I would be more than happy to see what I can do..

            I do appreciate your opinion though.. but I always thini that if everyone drove a chevy the road would be a boring place... and if companies didn't work together we'd still be riding horses ;)
            Processing Partners http://www.processingpartners.com

            Comment

            • gregtx
              Confirmed User
              • Jan 2002
              • 1929

              #56
              ah.. I didn't even realize we'd hit page two

              don't fret it Todd..
              Processing Partners http://www.processingpartners.com

              Comment

              • punker barbie
                Meow Meow!!!
                • Nov 2003
                • 10232

                #57
                Originally posted by RonC
                Congrats to both National-Net and Shaw Internet. This is great news for all current and future customers of ES knowing that they have two industry leaders behind this program.

                BTW

                Greg could you put a good word in with Tony and Brad to include my new small start up billing company called CCbill.com. We only have a couple of customers so far and one of the 2 might want to use your product If not I totally understand and will try to get a meeting with Tony when we get more customers.

                Ron Cadwell
                CEO
                ____________
                CCbill.com
                Cavecreek.com
                DRMnetworks.com
                Little company called CCBill? You crack me up babe.

                On a side note, Congrats to both parties this is an awesome partnership with tons of perks. Both are very solid companies that are here to stay.

                -Shirley
                Chaturbate Affiliate Support: [email protected]

                Comment

                • MissMina
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 2478

                  #58
                  Nice... I host with National Net

                  Comment

                  • WiredGuy
                    Pounding Googlebot
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 34517

                    #59
                    Congratulations, this is a great partnership between both your companies.
                    WG
                    I play with Google.

                    Comment

                    • Rochard
                      Jägermeister Test Pilot
                      • Dec 2001
                      • 75764

                      #60
                      Very nice!
                      Herschel Savage
                      Brooklyn, NY

                      Comment

                      • HorseShit
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Dec 2004
                        • 17513

                        #61
                        NATNET would have sounded cooler with NATS

                        Comment

                        • GT-Omar
                          DM at Performive.com
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 2968

                          #62
                          Congrats to all parties involved.


                          Email me

                          Skype me

                          Comment

                          • Vitasoy
                            GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 58202

                            #63
                            Congrats to the parties involved


                            [email protected]

                            Comment

                            • baddog
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Apr 2001
                              • 107089

                              #64
                              Originally posted by gregtx
                              lastly.. with National Net being the ones doing support .. they are the only ones with access to a clients database... which we feel will add a nice layer of confidentiality to any programs business...
                              That is a nice little perk.

                              Congrats on the acquisition/merger.

                              Comment

                              • TMM_John
                                Confirmed User
                                • May 2004
                                • 6665

                                #65
                                Wow. This got hostile.

                                Congrats to Brad & Greg and the NatNet team on the "marriage". Should do well for all parties involved.

                                As far as NatNet, I don't know Tony personally at all but have never heard anything negative about him (quite often just the opposite). We have no concerns at all about our customers (NATS) hosting at National Net. As sextoyking pointed out, just because they are partnering with one company doesn't mean they will support any other product worse. Will they recommend ES over us and MPA, etc.? Of course, but thats to be expected.

                                As far as market share, no one comes close ;-) I look forward to Brad finally getting fully into the ring tho. Should be good for program owners and affiliates. Competition breeds advancement.


                                Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

                                Comment

                                Working...