Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
Bullshit. If you have adult content, you need to have one.
|
Sorry to interject here, but is there really a law or regulation that says you do?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
Its because the idiots who own them think they are exempt from any warning pages, efforts to keep children off their blog, or from stopping those who do not want to view their site and accidentally stumbled across it.
|
My blogs are all topless or nude. They're also labeled with
http://www.rtalabel.org/ the RTA tag. Should I warn "kids" further with a tantalizing warning page before they hit the blog when they can land on news, war, and football sites without any kind of warning? Is a tit or pussy worse than an open-bone fracture?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
It is typical porn biz irresponsibility and it will remain this way until someone gets a serious smack down. At that point the bloggers an TGP owners will react like the sky is falling and you will see 200 threads a day about it on GFY, along with a million reasons why you should donate to the FSC.
|
I don't agree about porn "irresponsibility" but you're right about the probable smack-down. And the reaction lol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
By NOT having a warning page you are saying that YOU WANT CHILDREN TO ACCESS YOUR SITE. There is no other way to interpret the message you are sending by not having one.
|
Absolute disagreement.
Absence of a warning doesn't imply tacit permission or DESIRE to have your site accessed by children anymore than MSNBC's lack of a warning implies they want children to view war footage. Use of a "warning" is merely good form/etiquette to satisfy the moralists out there who think sex is worse than violence.
:D