Quote:
Originally posted by kronic
"The secondary producer may also apparently comply by naming the primary producer in its Notice and there disclosing the name of his/her/its "natural person" records custodian and the place of business where the primary maintains records."
Would this statement not mean that you wouldn't have to have 2257 records on file and instead simply name as the custodian of records, the primary producer?
That's how it reads to me.
|
Correct. Pretty easy to understand, huh? It boogles my mind to see the number of people who just don't get it.