I think that WIKIPEDIA is by far the greatest site on the internet

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • woj
    <&(©¿©)&>
    • Jul 2002
    • 47882

    #51
    50.,........
    Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
    Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
    Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

    Comment

    • Magix
      Confirmed User
      • Jun 2006
      • 2616

      #52
      yes i like wiki pedia very much too
      PSD to HTML/XHTML/CSS Services

      Comment

      • Moraxian
        Confirmed User
        • Jan 2004
        • 618

        #53
        Wikipedia is very cool.. A number of models I've photographed have articles in it.
        Moraxian's Game Room - Bound and Gagged Damsels-in-Distress
        Want to trade links with Moraxian's Game Room and our Satellite Sites?
        Need Hosting? ATCI Hosting - High Powered Hosting at an Affordable Price

        Comment

        • pornopedia
          Registered User
          • Apr 2009
          • 1

          #54
          pornopedia.org

          I totally agree! Wiki rocks! I'm totally happy with the software and with its possibilities.
          Have a look at pornopedia.org

          Comment

          • Libertine
            sex dwarf
            • May 2002
            • 17860

            #55
            Originally posted by aico
            Yep for sure, it's definitely the best place to get the most opinionated inaccurate information on the net.
            That's complete bullshit. It's actually about as accurate as Britannica:

            http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4530930.stm

            In my experience, the bulk of the articles on Wikipedia are quite accurate, especially slightly obscure non-controversial ones. High-profile controversial articles also tend to be fairly accurate, since they are usually under close scrutiny of both sides in a debate.

            There is a problem, however, with some articles on obscure but controversial topics. With those it occasionally happens that faulty information is added without anyone being there to spot it and correct it.
            /(bb|[^b]{2})/

            Comment

            • blazin
              Confirmed User
              • Aug 2002
              • 2781

              #56
              Yeah... wish I owned it so I could cover it with adsense ads...
              I don't endorse a god damn thing......

              Comment

              • Lace
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Mar 2004
                • 16116

                #57
                Originally posted by pornopedia
                I totally agree! Wiki rocks! I'm totally happy with the software and with its possibilities.
                Have a look at pornopedia.org
                Nice way to bump a three year old thread, idiot
                Your Paysite Partner
                Strength In Numbers!
                StickyDollars | RadicalCash | KennysPennies | HomegrownCash

                Comment

                • Cyber Fucker
                  Hmm
                  • Sep 2005
                  • 12642

                  #58
                  Yes, it's definitely one of the most useful websites out there.

                  Comment

                  • seeandsee
                    Check SIG!
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 50945

                    #59
                    Originally posted by bdjuf
                    By far the most useful and informative site on the internet

                    I'm on it every day , learning something new!
                    wikipedia is great
                    BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

                    Contact here

                    Comment

                    • Rochard
                      Jägermeister Test Pilot
                      • Dec 2001
                      • 75733

                      #60
                      I'm on Wikipedia a dozen times a day. I can get lost on Wikipedia, going from one subject to another.
                      Herschel Savage
                      Brooklyn, NY

                      Comment

                      • pornguy
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Mar 2003
                        • 62912

                        #61
                        So that's where you have been.. we have really missed those waxed eyebrows of yours.
                        PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

                        AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
                        TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

                        Comment

                        • CaptainHowdy
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Dec 2004
                          • 94741

                          #62

                          Comment

                          • Killswitch - BANNED FOR LIFE

                            #63
                            Originally posted by Dirty Dane
                            Lots of info but as long everyone can edit there its not reliable. I wouldn't use it as a doctor
                            Despite being a 3 year old thread... I don't agree with this statement. Wikipedia is very accurate, the users are Nazis when it comes to citing references and accuracy.

                            Comment

                            • Dirty Dane
                              Sick Fuck
                              • Feb 2004
                              • 9491

                              #64
                              Originally posted by Killswitch
                              Despite being a 3 year old thread... I don't agree with this statement. Wikipedia is very accurate, the users are Nazis when it comes to citing references and accuracy.
                              lol I'm not going to argue a 3 year old statement, but I will still say wikipedia is "as is". It is the sources you should surf to - not cite wikipedia itself

                              Comment

                              • Killswitch - BANNED FOR LIFE

                                #65
                                Originally posted by Dirty Dane
                                lol I'm not going to argue a 3 year old statement, but I will still say wikipedia is "as is". It is the sources you should surf to - not cite wikipedia itself
                                Can't be that inaccurate if schools are checking Wikipedia for stolen articles for their student papers.

                                Comment

                                • Dirty Dane
                                  Sick Fuck
                                  • Feb 2004
                                  • 9491

                                  #66
                                  Originally posted by Killswitch
                                  Can't be that inaccurate if schools are checking Wikipedia for stolen articles for their student papers.
                                  Which schools?

                                  Comment

                                  • Killswitch - BANNED FOR LIFE

                                    #67
                                    Originally posted by Dirty Dane
                                    Which schools?
                                    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=wikipedia+use+in+schools

                                    Comment

                                    • tranza
                                      ICQ: 197-556-237
                                      • Jun 2003
                                      • 57559

                                      #68
                                      No doubts it is very useful!
                                      I'm just a newbie.

                                      Comment

                                      Working...