Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
really ok care to explain how this fair use of parody would have been defended if youtube had to get proof that produces oked the use of their content first.
at the time it was put up the producers of that movie were arguing that simple changing the subtitles were not enough to be considered fair use
they were sending dmca take down notices to get rid of the videos.
and they were all working
eff put up their own downfall parody, they did a perfect job of explictly spelling out the fair use conditions, and when the takedown notice came they disputed.
As a result all the other downfall parodies which were removed were all put back.
So tell me how exactly would such an extension of fair use happen if the video can never be put up in the first place (because it doesn't have permission from the producer) and youtube must not allow it to be published at all without cede proof.
|
look the laws will be rewritten you wont have entire industries collapsing because a fair use rant, times have changed and laws will have to change to, tv networks arent selling any of their serier dvd's movie dvd's dead software dead music dead and you say sorry saving those industries and a few 100k jobs isnt important because you feel fair use blah blah
I dont write laws and I agree its not simple but one thing for sure stealing digital goods is something we need to start looking at as if its real goods, this is going to stop not because some pornmasters want it to stop lol but rather its destroying entire industries.