Thursday, June 11, 2009
Architectural/Structural Engineers Prove That Building #7 Should Not Have Collapsed Due to Fire
The hubris of trying to pass this off on American citizens. Were it not for the power of an authority (the Government)- "explaining" the collapse of Building #7 when the explanation was so illogical - NO ONE would have believed that Building #7 came down as the result of fires. We immediately accepted the story because human nature always will want to believe, and will initially automatically trust, a respected authority figure. Question authority figures - especially Government. Watch and evaluate facts by experts (see below the vid).
Go to this site to learn more facts from structural/architectural engineers who scientifically state government explanations for building collapses on 9/11 are false.
http://www4.ae911truth.org/#front_right_WTC7
As your own eyes witness ? WTC Building #7 (a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane) exhibits all the characteristics of a classic controlled demolition with explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics)
1. Rapid onset of ?collapse?
2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a full second prior to collapse
3. Symmetrical ?collapse? ? through the path of greatest resistance ? at free-fall acceleration
4.Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed mostly in its own footprint
5.Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6.Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
7.Chemical signature of Thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples by physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.
8.FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
9.Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
10.Fore-knowledge of ?collapse? by media, NYPD, FDNY
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never ?collapsed?.
As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all the characteristics of destruction by explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics)
1.Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
2.Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
3.Extremely rapid onset of destruction
4.Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
5.Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft at 60 mph
6.Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
7.Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
8.1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found
9.Isolated explosive ejections 20 ? 40 stories below demolition front
10.Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
11.Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
12.Evidence of thermite incendiaries found in steel & dust samples
13.FEMA steel analysis: sulfidation, oxidation & intergranular melting
14.No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1.Slow onset with large visible deformations
2.Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3.Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4.High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never ?collapsed