Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
Do you send your kid to public school?
If not, ignore this, if so... I guess you think, home owners should pay the rest of the bill for your kids education?
Not picking on anyone here, its just usually these public school folks who whine the most about the cost of school, when its home owners paying for your kids classroom anyway.
If you send your kid to private school, then no worries, but if you use public schools, then YES, you should be paying their gas/electric bill and not the home owners paying taxes to do so. imo
|
yes public school, but not about homeowner taxes which I pay...we also pay federal and state taxes in CA. And taxes are to contribute to the education of our kids. CA borrowed billions from the education fund, never paid it back and now can't even supply water to drink? I've contributed thousands over the years without question.
Barfooties is right...maybe private school will end up costing less!
I have no issue with paying for my daughter's thirst, but from a public school which would not be Top 5 without all parents constantly pitching in, but what about the other school districts where parents work 18 hours and can barely make ends meet in the household? Do their children go thirsty.
It's just wrong on principal. more ranting. my apology...but where will the line ever be drawn? When parents become the teachers in the classroom as well as life?
thanks for the post though!!
