North Korea has 700,000 troops - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

stev0

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 6801
Share

Post
#51

10-03-2006, 11:18 AM

Originally posted by KRL

All dictatorships eventually fail. History has proven that over and over. NK will eventually fail also.

So do democracies, and so will the US and every other country in existance... things change and always will.

N.Korea actually has alot more than 700k troops according to CNN's fact report

Military

The Korean People's Army encompasses the army, navy and air force and has 1.08 million active personnel and 4.7 million in reserves.

Military expenditures account for 31.3 percent of GDP expenditures, making North Korea --- dollar for dollar --- the world's most militaristic state.

Nearly one out of every four citizens serves in some military capacity.

North Korea is said to have an extensive chemical weapons program. A report by the Federation of American Scientists says that North Korea has chemical stockpiles of at least 180-250 tons of reserve-weaponized agents.

North Korea also reportedly has a biological weapons program based at the National Defense Research Institute and Medical Academy. This program is not as extensive as the chemical weapons program.

And whoever said they had no way to transport them, take a look at this...
http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/w...t.exclude.html

If the US was ever dumb enough to attack them there would definately be casualties happening on US soil
Comment
QuaWee

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 5791
Share

Post
#52

10-03-2006, 11:29 AM

Originally posted by vvq

Technology wins wars, not who has the most troops.

i believe you are right

i luv mainstream
Comment
jwhores

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2006

Posts: 103
Share

Post
#53

10-03-2006, 11:33 AM

Its sickening how N. Korea has a "five year plan"

Ring a bell? (Stalin)

Communist shit dont float, it s(t)inks
Comment
esnem
Share

Post
#54

10-03-2006, 02:10 PM

Originally posted by 12clicks

nope, I just paid for more than my share so when you came up short, we still had the ability to wage war.
Comment
crockett

in a van by the river

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 76818
Share

Post
#55

10-03-2006, 02:45 PM

Originally posted by stev0

So do democracies, and so will the US and every other country in existance... things change and always will.

N.Korea actually has alot more than 700k troops according to CNN's fact report

And whoever said they had no way to transport them, take a look at this...
http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/w...t.exclude.html

If the US was ever dumb enough to attack them there would definately be casualties happening on US soil

What I was talking about when I said they have no way to transport them, was meaning if they tried to move the troops by sea. The US navy would wipe them out. NK doesn't have a thing on the US navy and I can bet you anything, that any ship they do have that's worth a shit is under constant surveillance by US subs and satellites.

They don't have the military machine in place to move large amounts of troops around the world, so NK is little danger outside their little spot on this planet.

In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Comment
Shok

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 5611
Share

Post
#56

10-03-2006, 02:48 PM

Bamboo boats really dont make a great navy.
Comment
tony286

lurker

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 57021
Share

Post
#57

10-03-2006, 04:39 PM

the reason we have done nothing is they have nuclear weapons. This is why Iran wants to join the club.
Comment
Phoenix

BACON BACON BACON

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 35475
Share

Post
#58

10-03-2006, 04:43 PM

i have family in south korea now..so hopefully they just there where they are at

Telegram PhoenixBrad
https://quantads.io
Comment
elron

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 1553
Share

Post
#59

10-03-2006, 04:47 PM

Originally posted by directfiesta

zionist

123456

anyone who'll ever consider having his sites hosted with this fucktard - memories his kiddie attitude replies and then think twice
Comment
Pleasurepays

BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 11913
Share

Post
#60

10-03-2006, 04:55 PM

Originally posted by timberlands

No wonder the USA hasn't done jack shit to these guys.. they wouldn't just roll over.

hate to point out the obvious... but 700K people armed with AK-47s are nothing but a bigger and easier target to destroy.

it takes money to fight. it takes billions to fight a war. it takes tremendous resourses to fight a war. N Korea can't even feed their own people or regularly supply electricity 24hrs a day to its own capital city... they couldn't fight a war anywhere, on any scale if they wanted to.
Comment
AmigoPorn

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 21583
Share

Post
#61

10-03-2006, 04:58 PM

Damn, that's a lot for such a small country

ICQ: 267899523
Comment
OG LennyT

Wall Street Pimp

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 14345
Share

Post
#62

10-03-2006, 04:58 PM

Originally posted by elron

anyone who'll ever consider having his sites hosted with this fucktard - memories his kiddie attitude replies and then think twice

believe me... we know

Tradeking - my online broker | 4.95 a trade | make real $$
Comment
QuaWee

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 5791
Share

Post
#63

10-03-2006, 05:02 PM

Originally posted by Shok

Bamboo boats really dont make a great navy.

yea, I am sure they have bamboo boats,,,

i luv mainstream
Comment
crockett

in a van by the river

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 76818
Share

Post
#64

10-03-2006, 05:03 PM

Originally posted by Pleasurepays

hate to point out the obvious... but 700K people armed with AK-47s are nothing but a bigger and easier target to destroy.

it takes money to fight. it takes billions to fight a war. it takes tremendous resourses to fight a war. N Korea can't even feed their own people or regularly supply electricity 24hrs a day to its own capital city... they couldn't fight a war anywhere, on any scale if they wanted to.

well pretty much the only type of war they could successfully wage would be a defensive war on their own soil if invaded. They could manage a successful guerrilla style war but only if they were invaded.

No way could they afford to keep a war going in they were the invading army, say if they invaded the south. That's why if we went to war with them, we would just sit off the coast somewhere and lob missiles at them and drop bombs all day and night and likely never put troops on the ground other than some special forces.

In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Comment
Pleasurepays

BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 11913
Share

Post
#65

10-03-2006, 05:10 PM

Originally posted by crockett

well pretty much the only type of war they could successfully wage would be a defensive war on their own soil if invaded. They could manage a successful guerrilla style war but only if they were invaded.

Why would anyone invade N Korea? No one will benefit from it. There are no resources to be gained, no real interests to protect (apart from security arguments). They would most likely just get bombed into oblivion.

I would just beam the movie Super Size Me into the country for a week and watch the entire system implode with the common persons realization that tree bark and grass aren't in fact main dietary staples throughout the world.
Comment
BusterBunny

perverted justice decoy

Join Date: Aug 2005

Posts: 19291
Share

Post
#66

10-03-2006, 05:12 PM

we fought them already and it sucked ass.....this time around would proly the same except for the nuclear card.......

my sig caught gonoherpasyphilaids and died
Comment
L-Pink

working on my tan

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 39151
Share

Post
#67

10-03-2006, 05:18 PM

Round One, Korean Conflict (didn't even get war status)

North Korea had 600,000 plus soldiers dead (not casulities, dead)

China 400,000 plus dead.

US and Allies 50,000 plus dead.

We have come a long way since 1950 .... Korea has not.

This time Russia will not supply arms and China will not send the troops that actually did most of the previous fighting.

As Chris Rock would say "Baltimore could take North Korea"
Comment
directfiesta

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 30203
Share

Post
#68

10-03-2006, 05:19 PM

Originally posted by elron

anyone who'll ever consider having his sites hosted with this fucktard - memories his kiddie attitude replies and then think twice

sure, Einstein ... lol

ELRON:

and his great knowledge ... surfer:

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...47&postcount=6

Last edited by directfiesta; 10-03-2006, 05:22 PM.

I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
Comment
Chrome

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2001

Posts: 639
Share

Post
#69

10-03-2006, 05:33 PM

Originally posted by xroach

agression against north korea doesn't happen because of china

Who would build our iPods if we pissed of china?
Comment
crockett

in a van by the river

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 76818
Share

Post
#70

10-03-2006, 05:36 PM

Originally posted by Pleasurepays

Why would anyone invade N Korea? No one will benefit from it. There are no resources to be gained, no real interests to protect (apart from security arguments). They would most likely just get bombed into oblivion.

I guess you didn't read the rest of my post...

"That's why if we went to war with them, we would just sit off the coast somewhere and lob missiles at them and drop bombs all day and night and likely never put troops on the ground other than some special forces."

In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#71

10-03-2006, 05:37 PM

Originally posted by 12clicks

nope, I just paid for more than my share so when you came up short, we still had the ability to wage war.

It isn't easy, is it?
Comment
E$_manager

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Apr 2006

Posts: 13557
Share

Post
#72

10-03-2006, 06:53 PM

Originally posted by crockett

Just China and maybe Iran.. but Iran can't really do shit to help them other than cause more issues in the middle east. It's also unlikely China would risk what they have gained in their new found love of capitalism to help out NK.

NK is becoming more of a useless burden to China. I think even China is starting to see that.

More imporantly is the US even with the BS in Iraq still has many allies that would be affected by a war with NK or China. So it wouldn't just be the US fighting China or NK.

So they really wouldn't have a chance even if both China and NK joined forces.

So i can't see why they are thinking of the war so much, prepare, make nuclear weapon....THey wouldn't win anyway.

Enjoy more sales with EnjoyBucks!
Homemade: Asian : Ebony : GFs : Voyeur : Nudist : Public : 3D
Comment
sinclair

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 1431
Share

Post
#73

10-03-2006, 07:06 PM

Originally posted by crockett

Our govt knows we can't match countries like that when it comes to active troops unless their was a draft. That's why we have so much air and naval power.

Which has proven to be very effective fighting the insurgence in Iraq.

--
skype:vmgsinclair

"Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human sex."
Comment

Previous 1 2 template Next

Working...