Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
My point was, your question was kind of dumb..
It wouldn't be a conspiracy theory if we had a list of names that would prove a group within the Gov had a hand in it.
Then, the words "the government" is like, if you have a group of police, people don't name every cop, they don't say it was Swat mixed with beat cops mixed with officers, they say the word police.
|
you seem to at least understand that if you take a step and start to define "government" you open up so many ridiculous arguments that its better left alone.
we have a government consisting of hundreds of thousands of people. considerably more if you add NY State Government and then of course considerably more people when you factor in all the airport personnel, military, witnesses, fire dept, police dept etc etc etc.
you've just said you don't have to make it clear who did what. why? because you know full well that its not possible to orchestrate something like that on such a massive scale and pull it off perfectly. instead, like everyone else, you have to dodge the question because you know it leads to a losing argument. you have to believe that Al Gore and George Bush and Hillary Clinton and Newt Gingrich and Nanci Pelosi, Maxine Waters, the CIA, NSA, FBI etc etc etc... all meet behind close doors, give each other a secret handshake and plot evil plots to kill US Citizens together.... and through all this, no one changes their mind, has a change or heart etc.
all completely impossible... yet you call others sheep for not believing something so totally moronic and implausible.
and when someone says "a plane never hit the pentagon" and people start posting eye witness accounts, pics of plane parts scattered all over the place etc etc etc.. you have to retreat and insist "no one has posted one single bit of proof".... then you rely on conjecture and speculation which you call "facts" to construct an impossible scenario that makes far less sense than the government just hijacking a plane and flying it into the pentagon.
you cling to the idea that the buildings were demo'ed, completely ignoring the massive technical feat this is. the total volume of explosives required. the fact that buildings are not just simply "demo'ed" - they are prepared over time or that this would require (according to the "expert" cited in this thread) over 100 tons of the suspected explosive to actually be effective.. and you totally ignore the fact that 100 tons = 200,000 pounds and the impossible feat of setting up two massive structures in this way with NO ONE figuring it out or noticing.
the list goes on and on. you guys make no sense. that's why people are making fun of you. i would guess that no one here believes the whole story is being told... however, that's completely different than insisting an impossible story is the only truth and then labeling those who question you as "sheep" for what you see in your mind as the easy win.
its pathetic.
it seems we have a whole board full of structural engineers, aviation experts, counter terrorism experts and national security experts who happen to double as morbidly obese, mildly retarded and mostly broke webmasters.