Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephanie Hastert
I would like to inquire concerning true, real, user submitted amateur content as it pertains to 2257 regulations.
I know for a fact that many if not a majority of all the amateur content was taken, produced and submitted well after 1992.
Mainly what these pay site owners do is strip / rip all the amateur content they can off the internet ( That has been saturated with the same content they offer in their members area ) and create a pay site that contains that same content.
How can they possibly prove all the images that are producing these webmasters profit were taken before 1992 ?
Basically they are saying all their content is 17+ years old ? I beg to differ!
Where is the 2257 documentation of the images that I know for a fact were taken well after 1992 ?
Why hasn't 2257 Record-Keeping compliance enforced this mandatory regulation ?
It's abundantly obvious their 2257 documentation doesn't exist as they hide behind a 2257 code these webmasters can not prove one way or another.
Seeing all this illegal website activity, does 2257 compliance really matter now-a-days ?
Sincerely
Stephanie Hastert
PS: If need be, I can throw many, many of these websites under the bus but I am sure we all know who they are.
|
That's a lot of 'theory' being tossed around... Clearly you have no idea how this part of the business works.
We have taken user submitted content for years, and we have the records for all of it. Like 100's of other legit sites that do the same thing. It's not all that hard to figure out, 10 different solutions to making it legal. At that, under the new laws - It's even easier for someone to run this type of content.