I would like to inquire concerning true, real, user submitted amateur content as it pertains to 2257 regulations.
Quote:
|
the visual depictions were created prior to November 1, 1990, or were produced, manufactured, published, duplicated, reproduced, or reissued before May 26, 1992.
|
I know for a fact that many if not a majority of all the amateur content was taken, produced and submitted well after 1992.
Mainly what these pay site owners do is strip / rip all the amateur content they can off the internet ( That has been saturated with the same content they offer in their members area ) and create a pay site that contains that same content.
How can they possibly prove all the images that are producing these webmasters profit were taken before 1992 ?
Basically they are saying all their content is 17+ years old ? I beg to differ!
Where is the 2257 documentation of the images that I know for a fact were taken well after 1992 ?
Why hasn't 2257 Record-Keeping compliance enforced this mandatory regulation ?
It's abundantly obvious their 2257 documentation doesn't exist as they hide behind a 2257 code these webmasters can not prove one way or another.
Seeing all this illegal website activity, does 2257 compliance really matter now-a-days ?
Sincerely
Stephanie Hastert
PS: If need be, I can throw many, many of these websites under the bus but I am sure we all know who they are.