Webmasters - Does anyone still want MPEG over/as well as FLV, WMV and MP4?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bhutocracy
    Not making A Comeback
    • Dec 2001
    • 10218

    #1

    Webmasters - Does anyone still want MPEG over/as well as FLV, WMV and MP4?

    What does everyone prefer these days? Do you still use MPEGs provided by programs? We are about to start offering MP4's as well as our FLV's and WMV and are considering discontinuing new MPEG FHG production.. thoughts?
  • BV
    wtf
    • Sep 2001
    • 10914

    #2
    I quit using mpegs in 1999

    Comment

    • HorseShit
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Dec 2004
      • 17513

      #3
      videos are so 90s

      Comment

      • bhutocracy
        Not making A Comeback
        • Dec 2001
        • 10218

        #4
        Originally posted by BV
        I quit using mpegs in 1999
        They're so obsolete these days it's not funny but a decent whack of webmasters still use them. It would be good to find out why and why they wouldn't be placated with 3 superior alternative formats.

        Comment

        • halfpint
          GFY's Halfpint
          • Jun 2007
          • 15223

          #5
          I would have thought that most webmasters use flvs on blogs MPG's,TPG's and tubes now a days

          Get FREE website listings on Cryptocoinshops.net

          Comment

          • bdld
            $100,000
            • Dec 2001
            • 11452

            #6
            flv's have taken over.

            Comment

            • MikeSmoke
              Confirmed User
              • Nov 2002
              • 3241

              #7
              Believe it or not, I still have members using webTV and mpegs are all they can watch
              I've been trying to convince them to change whenever they write me - after eight years, I finally got a 70-year old to buy a computer

              icq: 541-739-92

              Comment

              • TheSenator
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Feb 2003
                • 13340

                #8
                FLV is like the standard now.
                ISeekGirls.com since 2005

                Comment

                • travis
                  Confirmed User
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 117

                  #9
                  There's no reason to use download formats ancillary to FLV. With Flash video being pretty damn amazing in quality-capability coupled with the fact it is officially the world's most pervasive software platform (99.0% install rate of Internet-enabled desktops in mature markets).

                  More info on the ubiquity of Flash:

                  http://www.adobe.com/products/player...netration.html

                  Can we use your site in our portfolio? Get 20% off! Act now, expires after 6 takers.

                  Comment

                  • bhutocracy
                    Not making A Comeback
                    • Dec 2001
                    • 10218

                    #10
                    Originally posted by travis
                    There's no reason to use download formats ancillary to FLV. With Flash video being pretty damn amazing in quality-capability coupled with the fact it is officially the world's most pervasive software platform (99.0% install rate of Internet-enabled desktops in mature markets).

                    More info on the ubiquity of Flash:

                    http://www.adobe.com/products/player...netration.html
                    Well WMV's have downloadable DRM and MP4's are higher quality and work with ipods/psps/etc. We're all about the FLVs at Gunz and have been for years. We were probably the first to offer flash movie banners back before FLV's and you had to use a swf. It's more a question of what webmasters want to promote us with as opposed to penetration statistics. When you have thousands of affiliates some of them are going to have the ways they like doing things and MPEGs have lasted far longer than they've had any right to on the webmaster side of the equation. Most actual paysites dropped them long ago because of bandwidth and quality issues. Surely the day is close at hand, if not a distant memory where a 1-2 minute FLV/WMV/MP4 is preferable by all to 3 x 15 second MPEGs?
                    I'm just trying to guage the general consensus before we start talking to individual affiliates.
                    Last edited by bhutocracy; 04-08-2009, 09:57 PM.

                    Comment

                    • born2blog
                      Confirmed User
                      • Sep 2006
                      • 1801

                      #11
                      should always be flv's at this point, much smaller file size, until something better comes along of course
                      Juicy Ads - Buy & Sell Quality Traffic!!

                      Comment

                      • u-Bob
                        there's no $$$ in porn
                        • Jul 2005
                        • 33063

                        #12
                        well, there's a difference between what webmasters use and what webmasters offer to their surfers.

                        Comment

                        Working...