Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
It is a matter of situations though. Germany had a huge army and any attack on them would have resulted in them striking back with force. Obviously things may have ended differently, maybe they would have been contained to their country and the scale of the war would have never been a big. But that is something we may never know. For all we know they could have been attacked and defeated the attackers then struck back against a now depleted Europe.
Saddam was a threat to nobody outside his borders. It is becoming clear that we knew this before we ever invaded.
|
I am mainly trying to say that it is a lot easier to determine whether or not intervention was "needed" or "not needed" in hindsight. In hindsight we can rip each other to pieces and ask "why didn't this happen?" "Why didn't that happen?"
In six months if Iran pops up with a nuclear bomb there will be all sorts of "why didn't such and such happen?" If in six months we decide to go after Iran with the idea that they have a nuclear bomb and they don't have it there will be all sorts of "why did we do that?"
Hindsight is like war. If you win, you're a hero and you did this great thing. If you lose, you are a loser and will go down in flames.
Just say for example sake that a nuclear bomb was found in Iraq... today would be a totally different day. Would George W. Bush have been called one of the greatest President's? Maybe... until he found somewhere else to screw up. :-)
__________________
Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More -
Paxum and BTC Accepted
Windows VPS now available
Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
Click here for more details.