...isnt it obvious?...the thumbs are often being used as trade bait, to redirect the surfer to another TGP...not to the gallery...imo, that is an improper use of sponsors content..
With the ammended 2257 requirements recently passed & the lack of sponsors willing to allow webmaster physical custody of docs, I went all text on my entire network. (some still have a few thumbs, but they're all non nude thumbs)..
...isnt it obvious?...the thumbs are often being used as trade bait, to redirect the surfer to another TGP...not to the gallery...imo, that is an improper use of sponsors content..
Besides, they are getting free traffic, why would they care.
you are assuming they are getting as much free traffic back as they are losing...there is no data to back that up...clearly some sponsors will benefit and some will not...
you are assuming they are getting as many sales back, as they are losing...there is no data to back that up...clearly some sponsors will benefit and some will not...
you are assuming they are getting as many sales back, as they are losing...there is no data to back that up...clearly some sponsors will benefit and some will not...
They aren't losing any sales. FHGs are all about getting traffic.
The only sponsor I knew who actively tried to prevent this was ATK. But it is a task virtually impossible to regulate. Possible sure, but very labor intensive.
XXXRewards - Karups - Boyfun - Jawked. Paying on time since 1997. Contact me at brent [at] xxxrewards.com
you are assuming they are getting as many sales back, as they are losing...there is no data to back that up...clearly some sponsors will benefit and some will not...
no disrecpect to you, but I think all sponsors benefit from that model
but then again, I just came from playing soccer so I'm tired, and since I don't run either a TGP nor a sponsor program, I don't really feel the need to debate it
They aren't losing any sales. FHGs are all about getting traffic.
Shemp is talking about sites that when a thumb is clicked, the thumb does not link to the FHG or gallery advertising the sponsor. The link instead leads to another TGP or trade site. The sponsor is losing out because the content is being misused. As Shemp pointed out, it is "trade bait". Linking to a trade using sponsor content does not benefit that sponsor one bit.
There are always going to be surfers who prefer text TGPs.
BTW, you would think skimming on a thumb TGP would piss the surfer off.
You click the picture because thats what you want to see and then your given another thumb TGP and 90 more thumbs that have to load
Ofcourse it pisses the surfer off. Thats why I rather have a 50k non skim tgp than a 200k skimming one. But its harder to grow ofcourse when they don't skim.
To answer the question, no I don't think text TGP sites are dead. The only reason it appears that thumb sites rule, is because of the marketing and that they are visually appealing, so everyone and their brother launched one.
Some people are learning that switching over to a thumb only format, isn't producing as much profit and/or traffic for them as their text only format, so some people are switching back to text or a combination of thumbs and text.
i personally think that text tegp's will slow down in the next 5 years. people with content (2257 compliant) are already experimenting with different forms...
I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?
...isnt it obvious?...the thumbs are often being used as trade bait, to redirect the surfer to another TGP...not to the gallery...imo, that is an improper use of sponsors content..
I think it should be noted theres a difference between a CJ and a regular thumb TGP. You can't lump them both together.
The CJ sites I can see as being used improperly cuz you cant get a single click to the gallery, meaning the thumb is in no way being used to promote the sponsor so the content is being used improperly according to most sponsor rules.
But theres not much negative said or to be said about the accepted TGP style of 50 - 80 skim. The more traffic a TGP gets from using that thumb as a trade tool results in more traffic going to that thumb link anyways. Who's going to complain about that?
As for text tgp's, we've seen a tonne of American webmasters switch to this format since 2257. Theyre one way to ensure your traffic is good quality I suppose, weeding out the non english speakers. And of course SE is better with them. But thumb TGP's are visually pleasing and hard to beat in an industry that is based on visual pleasure.
I think it should be noted theres a difference between a CJ and a regular thumb TGP. You can't lump them both together.
The CJ sites I can see as being used improperly cuz you cant get a single click to the gallery, meaning the thumb is in no way being used to promote the sponsor so the content is being used improperly according to most sponsor rules.
But theres not much negative said or to be said about the accepted TGP style of 50 - 80 skim. The more traffic a TGP gets from using that thumb as a trade tool results in more traffic going to that thumb link anyways. Who's going to complain about that?
As for text tgp's, we've seen a tonne of American webmasters switch to this format since 2257. Theyre one way to ensure your traffic is good quality I suppose, weeding out the non english speakers. And of course SE is better with them. But thumb TGP's are visually pleasing and hard to beat in an industry that is based on visual pleasure.
thanks for the TGP info...i'll make a note of it ;)
I think it should be noted theres a difference between a CJ and a regular thumb TGP. You can't lump them both together.
The CJ sites I can see as being used improperly cuz you cant get a single click to the gallery, meaning the thumb is in no way being used to promote the sponsor so the content is being used improperly according to most sponsor rules.
But theres not much negative said or to be said about the accepted TGP style of 50 - 80 skim. The more traffic a TGP gets from using that thumb as a trade tool results in more traffic going to that thumb link anyways. Who's going to complain about that?
Yes, there is a difference between a CJ and a regular thumb TGP. But the basic point still remains the same. Both a CJ and a regular thumb TGP feed their trades using mostly sponsor provided content, whether it is from a submitter or creating a fake TGP. Few sites consist of purchased content alone. The only benefit to the sponsor would be if the TGP or CJ site concentrated on only their sites within their program. When a site begins to list galleries advertising multiple sponsors, the competition gets fierce for the traffic. Even with 50-80 skim, it's still a misuse of sponsor content.
The only time a CJ or TGP site is not misusing content, is if the site has no skim whatsoever, the site only skims traffic from thumbs of their purchased content, or the skimmed sponsor thumbs link to custom sites or tour pages advertising only that sponsor the thumb belongs to.
Whenever a site uses a sponsor thumb that links to anywhere other than a site, gallery, or custom page solely advertising that sponsor, it's misusing sponsor content no matter what the skim rate is.
This topic is fucking retarded. Most of the largest fucking TGPs on the planet are in text only format and do not skim. Even your larger thumb TGPs such as Madthumbs, Bunnyteens, OnlyCarla etc will give you a gallery for the first 3 clicks. Guess what happens after that? trade fucking city. Im not saying that there are no CJ text sites of course there are. I just think that people tend to trust a text tgp more so than they would a thumb TGP i.e. madthumbs given their track record. they suck. Great business model if the year was 2000. Moronic business model when the year reflects 2006.
oh yeah and do not fuck with what the Shemp says. He pwns all of your turd peons. anyone that wants to fuck with that statement can suck the assjuice out of last weeks underwear from the floor of my closet. and another for you mother fucker.
...isnt it obvious?...the thumbs are often being used as trade bait, to redirect the surfer to another TGP...not to the gallery...imo, that is an improper use of sponsors content..
My program is to small to deny affiliates doing that. I'd loose 90% of my affiliates or traffic if I did not allow that
Aside from a few old skool text tgps (thehun/worldsex etc) are text TGPs dead?
Thumb TGPs are the norm now?
Discuss.
LOL, no text link TGP/MPG's are very much alive and kicking these days.
Thumb TGP/MPG's are by far the most popular out of the two as these days there are loads of adult webmasters so very keen to give a surfer easier access to free porn to get the traffic stats up quickly so they can make a few $ selling partner accounts on the back of their "impresive" traffic stats.
Most people make thumb tgps nowadays, because they are easier to grow. But text tgps convert a lot better, the traffic is more tartgetted because of descriptions(if they are good). Right now I know only 1 good converting thumb tgp.
Text GPs are likely to increase in popularity because:
1) Light on bandwidth.
2) Text qualifies surfers more - a lot of window shoppers will leave a text GP and conversly, the non-(thumbnail)-clutter of a text GP attracts serious surfers (who convert).
3) With sponsors offering FHG and descriptions, it's much easier to blast off several hundred pages/niches of text GPs.
4) While it's a soft advantage, 2257 seems to have convinced many affiliates to go non-graphic (to avoid hosting explicit image content) - text GP wins again, although I'm not sure that 2257 exempts (or will exempt) explicit sexual text as much as many would like to think.
5) Oh yeh, SE traffic rocks and it's FREE to text GPs!
I'm not so sure about that. When surfers click on a thumb tha get directed to a TGP site instead of the gallery, they think twice about re-clicking on the same thumb.
Comment