here's what REALLY happened to the Pentagon. I was standing outside and I turned around really quick and my huge cock slammed into the side of the building and caused all the damage.
"The 9/11 truthers share a lieutenant colonel's love of acronyms. They divide themselves into LIHOPS and MIHOPS and differences are not trifling. LIHOP stands for "Let It Happen On Purpose," which means someone inside the U.S. government intentionally let the terror conspiracy go. MIHOP means "Made It Happen On Purpose," and its gradations center on whether Bush was in or out of the loop (a surprising number believe he was clueless) and whether the Mossad or British intelligence was dealt into the deal."
Now THAT makes a lot more sense than anything mentioned previously.
"Let it happen on purpose"...I'm much more willing to believe that than the government had their hands on it directly.
Knowing what government bureaucracy is like however and hearing some of the tape recordings I've heard on the issue, I'd still tend to believe that the government just fucked up (or simply weren't prepared) and are hiding how BAD they fucked up...but "LIHOP" ISN'T out of the realm of possibility either.
Several planes were hijacked that day...why not simply let a plane hit the pentagon instead of missiles? The wtc was hit by planes and almost the pentagon as well..whats so wrong with a plane that hit the pentagon??
Why would the government place bombs in the wtc? To go to war with Iraq? 2 planes crashing into the building wasnt enough?
Now answer this instead of coming up with stupid questions you heard in loose change.
So it was a missile that entered the Pentagon. Then where did the plane go with all its passengers and crew?
Give me good explanation and i will stfu from now on and if you idiots cant then you stfu from now on. Deal?
Here's a question just as valid as yours. If a plane hit the Pentagon, why the fuck was there never single piece of plane wreckage found?
Any how is it possible that a plane with a wing span many many times larger then the hole in the Pentagon Wall simply vanished before impact? I think you're the conspiracy theorist, saying a plane hit the wall, when its clearly impossible for that to have happened, thats a conspiracy.... Asshat.
Last edited by leedsfan; 09-08-2006, 01:51 PM.
Reason: spelling error
Here's a question just as valid as yours. If a plane hit the Pentagon, why the fuck was there never single piece of plane wreckage found?
Are you retarded or retarded? Where in godsname did you hear about no plane wreckage found? There was plenty wreckage found. Where you do idiots get your info from?
I'm still trying to figure out why there is 0 proof or evidence that something as big as a commercial plane hit the Pentagon. I mean, something as big as that, hitting the fucking Pentagon, in this day and age, with all the cameras there are around that place, nobody has anything remotely depicting an airplane in the area.
Any how is it possible that a plane with a wing span many many times larger then the hole in the Pentagon Wall simply vanished before impact? I think you're the conspiracy theorist, saying a plane hit the wall, when its clearly impossible for that to have happened, thats a conspiracy.... Asshat.
What does this look like to you? A pic taken very shortly after the plane hit the building.
Does that look like:
A: A missile hit the Pentagon
B: A plane with large wings hit the Pentagon
Are you retarded or retarded? Where in godsname did you hear about no plane wreckage found? There was plenty wreckage found. Where you do idiots get your info from?
There was almost no wreckage found on the scene: specialist say that the temperature was so hot that a lot of metal evaporated.. strangly enough some passports(paper!!) from in the plane where found at the scene..
A plane hit the Pentagon like there were weapons of mass destruction.
There was proof of WMD's rite? What happened to it?
You saw the same video I did. Did it look like a big fucking plane hitting the Pentagon?
Show us the wrekage. I forgot they covered it all up with a big tent.
opinions are like assholes.................
"They aren't after me, they are AFTER YOU! Im just in their way"
-D.J. Trump
+ some picture of the scene show a piece of an engine: when you look up the type of the engine you will see that that type of engine never has been used on the plane that 'hit' the pentagon!
There was almost no wreckage found on the scene: specialist say that the temperature was so hot that a lot of metal evaporated.. strangly enough some passports(paper!!) from in the plane where found at the scene..
There were parts of a plane found, some quite big. How did the get there? People quickly dropped them there after the missile hit? ALso they dug up some bodies out of the plane that was shot in the ocean and dropped them between the debris? The blackboxes? How did they get there? Also planted AFTER the missile hit the building?
+ some picture of the scene show a piece of an engine: when you look up the type of the engine you will see that that type of engine never has been used on the plane that 'hit' the pentagon!
No, thats not when YOU look it up, thats when idiots who are making a conspiracy video look it up and need something exciting in their documentary to feed the sheep.
How did they find dna matching victims that were on that flight inside the Pentagon? How did the blackboxes get there? How get the plane wreckage parts get there? Remember the plane was shot down in the ocean???
Why not let the plane hit the Pentagon like what happened with the WTC and almost the Capitol. Wouldve been WAAAAY easier.
What does this look like to you? A pic taken very shortly after the plane hit the building.
Does that look like:
A: A missile hit the Pentagon
B: A plane with large wings hit the Pentagon
What you're showing is a pic with lots of smoke...
Here's a pic after the smoke cleared .. no humongous amount of damage... no wing or engine destruction... this was to the immediate left of the single hole....
What you're showing is a pic with lots of smoke...
Here's a pic after the smoke cleared .. no humongous amount of damage... no wing or engine destruction... this was to the immediate left of the single hole....
Looks fine to me. Hole on the right where the plane entered the building and the left of it is damaged. I doubt a missile would make it look that way.
What you're showing is a pic with lots of smoke...
Here's a pic after the smoke cleared .. no humongous amount of damage... no wing or engine destruction... this was to the immediate left of the single hole....
Anyway:
How did they find dna matching victims that were on that flight inside the Pentagon? How did the blackboxes get there? How get the plane wreckage parts get there?
Why not let the plane hit the Pentagon like what happened with the WTC and almost the Capitol. Wouldve been WAAAAY easier.
We had a plane crash years ago..cant think of the name crashed, by the everglades and u wouldn't even have known a plane had crashed there...there was hardly any debris.
Sadly Franck, you're posting pictures of where you are trying to prove a plane "could be" by the damage.... yet with no actual real plane in either picture, much less really convincing damage.
You're not strengthening your case much. I'd ask for help at this point.
How did they find dna matching victims that were on that flight inside the Pentagon?
DNA is very delicate, yet it managed to survive a fire that completely disolved a 757.. Titanium parts and all??
Why not let the plane hit the Pentagon like what happened with the WTC and almost the Capitol. Wouldve been WAAAAY easier.
Well.. Rumsfeld said it was a missile s short time after it happened...
In speaking about the Pentagon......
Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.
Was he right? Was he wrong? Did he just guess? Was he not informed accurately?
Sadly Franck, you're posting pictures of where you are trying to prove a plane "could be" by the damage.... yet with no actual real plane in either picture, much less really convincing damage.
You're not strengthening your case much. I'd ask for help at this point.
Maybe its because ive seen an 3d computer animation showing frame by frame what happened to the plane when it hit the Pentagon on discovery channel and the damage make sense to me, as well as the pics.
You think a wing wouldve made a whole as large as the wing? In a building like the Pentagon?
Nope.. but it would have definitely made a serious mark... and the 6 ton engine would have made a BIG mark..
Just imagine a 6 ton object hitting a wall at 500 mph... It's gonna leave a mark...
Maybe its because ive seen an 3d computer animation showing frame by frame what happened to the plane when it hit the Pentagon on discovery channel and the damage make sense to me, as well as the pics.
I saw that too, was pretty neat. There's still no plane in your pictures.
You started this thread asking what happened to it. And then you post pictures of where it should be and yet... no plane. You're contradicting yourself.
Maybe its because ive seen an 3d computer animation showing frame by frame what happened to the plane when it hit the Pentagon on discovery channel and the damage make sense to me, as well as the pics.
Someone could make a 3d animation of a wing jumping off and doing the Irish jig... doesn't mean that's what happened...
There are diagrams made by national engineering organizations showing the inside of the bldg. after impact.. Support posts that would have been struck are pointing toward the outside, Very few posts damaged, no destruction of the floor immediately inside the bldg., yada yada.. Not the scenario of a 757 slamming into it..
You don't know that the plane existed, you are only going on speculation that there was a plane. Names can be easily made up.
C'mon man. Please tell me your just playing devil's advocate here and don't seriously believe that. Believe the missile theory even, but don't say the plane and people never existed.
And this picture. Whats more likely? A missile or a plane?
Both.
The most logical alternative theory is that a plane other than a 757 was fitted with a missile. This way spectators will report seeing a plane, and they can also accomplish maximum damage.
Many spectators claimed to have seen a small plane. This goes with the theory that a military jet was painted to look like a commercial airline.
There was almost no wreckage found on the scene: specialist say that the temperature was so hot that a lot of metal evaporated.. strangly enough some passports(paper!!) from in the plane where found at the scene..
Where do you get this information? There were hundreds of workers who helped clear the wreckage in the coming months following the attack. These were all documented. Can you show me a single reputable source that says that all these people didn't find any plane parts? Please. I keep hearing you spout out all these things like "there was no wreckage" yet you guys don't have a single piece of evidence to back it up. You look at 3 pictures and all of a sudden have more in-depth knowledge than the hundreds of rescue workers on scene. Are you saying all these hundreds of workers are in on the conspiracy too?
Comment