© 2005 MichelleLynn.com - All rights reserved.
All models are 18 years old or older, and are portraying college girls 18 years of age or older.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement.
then NO, it is NOT a pedo site... its called teen niche
? 2005 MichelleLynn.com - All rights reserved.
All models are 18 years old or older, and are portraying college girls 18 years of age or older.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement.
then NO, it is NOT a pedo site... its called teen niche
spaz
OK so if she is 18 then it's not illegal (I suppose) but does that make it OK?
she is portrayed as underage and that IS wrong and IS pandering to pedos
in some countries (like the uk) there are laws against "Pesudo Child Porn"
90% of the teen sites are using legal 18+ girls with kiddie faces that look way younger than 18 , of course all of them declare that they are over 18 so officially they dont pesudo childporn .Your poll is either comming from naive point or sigwhoring interest .
child Pronunciation (chld)
1. A person between birth and puberty.
2. a. An unborn infant; a fetus.
b. An infant; a baby.
Puberty = 12 y.o.
She doesnt look 12, therefore It's not pedo.
Maybe not, but number 3 in the poll sums it up.
I may not be pedo but it is certainly pandering to pedos, if you get off on 14 year old girls, doesn't matter if she is 18 she is made to look 14, then you are a pedo or at least a wannabe pedo.
Wrong. Anyone under the age of 18 is considered a minor.
Child = anyone under the age of puberty.
if you were to shoot a 17 year old nude what would happend you'd be charged with producing CP... now if you shot an 18 year old that looked like a 17 year old what would happen nothing...
and if the ID says 18 and you have all the docs to back it up then what?
The point is these sites make girls look underage and cater to pedos and its sites like this that makes the general public think we are all pushing CP and does us no good.
There are 2 teen niches the normal -20 hot girls "teen" niche and the "teen girls made to look underage so perverts signup" niche.
if you were to shoot a 17 year old nude what would happend you'd be charged with producing CP...
You are wrong.
You would be charged with "visual depiction of minors engaged in a sex act such as intercourse, oral sex, or masturbation as well as the lascivious depictions of the genitals"
The point is these sites make girls look underage and cater to pedos and its sites like this that makes the general public think we are all pushing CP and does us no good.
There are 2 teen niches the normal -20 hot girls "teen" niche and the "teen girls made to look underage so perverts signup" niche.
there you go thats a lot different then what you were saying above yes it does bring unwanted attention to the industry and to the sites within this niche but theres not much the public or the law can do if the girl is over the age of 18.
go surf around and take a look at 90% of the other teen sites not just solo sites out there you will find atleast 1 girl on the sites that looks like she could possibly be underage and thats why 2257 is such a big issue and why the government is cracking down so hard and why so many companies are finally getting their shit together.
you can't just single out one site when it comes to this stuff
i honestly think little summer and little april look much younger than michelle lynn
You would be charged with "visual depiction of minors engaged in a sex act such as intercourse, oral sex, or masturbation as well as the lascivious depictions of the genitals"
atleast 3 sites named in this thread do it... but how do they justify what is considered border line and not just an 18 year old being an 18 year old or an 18 year old being a 17 year old which like you said would be illegal?
there you go thats a lot different then what you were saying above yes it does bring unwanted attention to the industry and to the sites within this niche but theres not much the public or the law can do if the girl is over the age of 18.
go surf around and take a look at 90% of the other teen sites not just solo sites out there you will find atleast 1 girl on the sites that looks like she could possibly be underage and thats why 2257 is such a big issue and why the government is cracking down so hard and why so many companies are finally getting their shit together.
you can't just single out one site when it comes to this stuff
i honestly think little summer and little april look much younger than michelle lynn
right! that is exactly why sites that deal with teen content really need to have their shit together and i would bet everyone of the sites you mentioned are very prepared for an investigation if the gov turned up at their doors.
I think if your going to be dealing with this niche in particular you need to pay close attention to staying within the legal guidelines
I don't often find myself agreeing with Dark Jedi about anything, but in this case he is pretty much correct. The true definition of "pedophilia" has to do with one having a sexual affinity for pre-pubescent children, which means around the age of 12 and younger.
It's just easier for people to toss the word "pedo" around even for underage minors 13-17, but it's not accurate.
Is it right that older guys are slathering over underaged girls? Of course not. But if the models are all 18+ and there are docs to prove it, then the only issue is if the authorities want to argue over her "appearing to be underage".
I'm not up on what exactly that law (if it exists) entails in the USA. (or Canada for that matter). I think I did hear a while back that they (the US gov't) was trying to create a law where they could go after such sites that blatantly make up their 18+ models to look younger and sexualize them on adult sites, non-nude included. But I don't know if it went into effect yet.
Dressing your wife up is perfectly ok! getting her to hug teddybears and suck lollypops thru cosmetic dental braces while you pretend she is your daughter is not!
atleast 3 sites named in this thread do it... but how do they justify what is considered border line and not just an 18 year old being an 18 year old or an 18 year old being a 17 year old which like you said would be illegal?
Dressing your wife up is perfectly ok! getting her to hug teddybears and suck lollypops thru cosmetic dental braces while you pretend she is your daughter is not!
Comment