NATS vs Xclusivecash - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

spacedog

Yes that IS me. Bitch.

Join Date: Nov 2001

Posts: 14149
Share

Post
#1

NATS vs Xclusivecash

08-24-2006, 08:22 PM

there's just one thing I don't understand?

something extremely peculiar about the thread that started this, & I just realized something about it .. I need link to that thread to read it again before I say what's on my mind,,..

anyway, you people read the thread.. go read the part about somebody noticing discrepancies between ccbill stats & the stats in nats admin.. go read that part & think about that for a few minutes..
Tags: None
PMdave

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2003

Posts: 1517
Share

Post
#2

08-24-2006, 08:40 PM

Seems like it's more NATS fault than anything else to me. Since there is no access to the source code how can there be discrepancies? NATS pulls the data from the billers. Program owner can't just program in a little feature to only pull 80% of the stats since they don't have access to the sourcecode.
Just my 2 cents... I could be way wrong here...
Comment
Jace

FBOP Class Of 2013

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 35562
Share

Post
#3

08-24-2006, 08:45 PM

I hear what you are saying...it could have happened that way and NATS could be at fault in the long run, but what if xclusivecash knew about the "glitch" or whatever it could have been, and did nothing about it for months on end?

wasn't there some other NATS programs owners saying a while ago that occasionally the link between ccbill and nats get disrupted and needs to be "reattached" because of changes at ccbill or changes to the nats software? What if one of those disruptions occured, but xclusivecash never said anything, and continued to knowingly let rebills not get reported back into nats from ccbill?
Comment
spacedog

Yes that IS me. Bitch.

Join Date: Nov 2001

Posts: 14149
Share

Post
#4

08-24-2006, 08:48 PM

Originally posted by PMdave

Seems like it's more NATS fault than anything else to me. Since there is no access to the source code how can there be discrepancies? NATS pulls the data from the billers. Program owner can't just program in a little feature to only pull 80% of the stats since they don't have access to the sourcecode.
Just my 2 cents... I could be way wrong here...

I had something else on my mind,, but I'm not saying it til I read the thread & am 100% certain on what I remember,, I need to know if it was a "webmaster" that noticed discrepancies..
Comment
r-c-e

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 1070
Share

Post
#5

08-24-2006, 08:49 PM

Its all just speculation. I guess the truth will come out if it goes to trial.
Comment
spacedog

Yes that IS me. Bitch.

Join Date: Nov 2001

Posts: 14149
Share

Post
#6

08-24-2006, 08:53 PM

Originally posted by Jace

I hear what you are saying...it could have happened that way and NATS could be at fault in the long run, but what if xclusivecash knew about the "glitch" or whatever it could have been, and did nothing about it for months on end?

wasn't there some other NATS programs owners saying a while ago that occasionally the link between ccbill and nats get disrupted and needs to be "reattached" because of changes at ccbill or changes to the nats software? What if one of those disruptions occured, but xclusivecash never said anything, and continued to knowingly let rebills not get reported back into nats from ccbill?

Oh, yeah & out of all these wonderful programs, Xclusive cash "(might/could/possibly") be the ONLY one (maybe) doing it,, I'm sure there's plenty others (could be doing the same).,, personally, I think,, well, never mind what I think...
Comment
JMM

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 1755
Share

Post
#7

08-24-2006, 08:53 PM

Originally posted by spacedog

I had something else on my mind,, but I'm not saying it til I read the thread & am 100% certain on what I remember,, I need to know if it was a "webmaster" that noticed discrepancies..

Yes, that was said in the original thread. The discrepancy was pointed out by a 3rd party webmaster, TMM investigated, found the discrepancy and contacted XC.
Comment
Jace

FBOP Class Of 2013

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 35562
Share

Post
#8

08-24-2006, 08:56 PM

Originally posted by spacedog

Oh, yeah & out of all these wonderful programs, Xclusive cash "(might/could/possibly") be the ONLY one (maybe) doing it,, I'm sure there's plenty others (could be doing the same).,, personally, I think,, well, never mind what I think...

well, that doesn't matter right now, cause XclusiveCash is the only one on trial (literally...LOL)
Comment
spacedog

Yes that IS me. Bitch.

Join Date: Nov 2001

Posts: 14149
Share

Post
#9

08-24-2006, 08:58 PM

Originally posted by JMM

Yes, that was said in the original thread. The discrepancy was pointed out by a 3rd party webmaster, TMM investigated, found the discrepancy and contacted XC.

I fucking knew it, I call bullshit,, I smell bullshit,,,

You don't get CCBill stats for programs if you sign up through nats..
Comment
BluMedia

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 3973
Share

Post
#10

08-24-2006, 08:58 PM

Originally posted by PMdave

Seems like it's more NATS fault than anything else to me. Since there is no access to the source code how can there be discrepancies? NATS pulls the data from the billers. Program owner can't just program in a little feature to only pull 80% of the stats since they don't have access to the sourcecode.
Just my 2 cents... I could be way wrong here...

I think if someone did do this the rebills would not match and NATS would know.

Mark

IntenseCash - If you can't convert us then you might want to look for a new job
.
BrokeStraightBoys.com converting 1:124 stats counted by Nats
Comment
spacedog

Yes that IS me. Bitch.

Join Date: Nov 2001

Posts: 14149
Share

Post
#11

08-24-2006, 08:58 PM

Originally posted by Jace

well, that doesn't matter right now, cause XclusiveCash is the only one on trial (literally...LOL)

Umm.. actually, it's NATS on trial..
Comment
JMM

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 1755
Share

Post
#12

08-24-2006, 09:00 PM

Originally posted by spacedog

I fucking knew it, I call bullshit,, I smell bullshit,,,

You don't get CCBill stats for programs if you sign up through nats..

True..but you do get NATS stats and if you were doing any kind of volume it would be easy to see that the rebills had vanished.
Comment
DateDoc

Outside looking in.

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 14243
Share

Post
#13

08-24-2006, 09:02 PM

if this is a nats issue and not just an XC issue how much money are you leaving on the table unclaimed each month?
Comment
spacedog

Yes that IS me. Bitch.

Join Date: Nov 2001

Posts: 14149
Share

Post
#14

08-24-2006, 09:08 PM

Originally posted by JMM

True..but you do get NATS stats and if you were doing any kind of volume it would be easy to see that the rebills had vanished.

so, how did this 3rd party notice discrepancies between ccbill stats & nats stats if the 3rd party only has nats stats?
Comment
PMdave

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2003

Posts: 1517
Share

Post
#15

08-24-2006, 09:10 PM

Originally posted by spacedog

so, how did this 3rd party notice discrepancies between ccbill stats & nats stats if the 3rd party only has nats stats?

With vanished I think means
Log in to nats >10 rebills
Log in again to nats 2 mins later > 5 rebills gone 5 left
Comment
spacedog

Yes that IS me. Bitch.

Join Date: Nov 2001

Posts: 14149
Share

Post
#16

08-24-2006, 09:11 PM

Originally posted by PMdave

With vanished I think means
Log in to nats >10 rebills
Log in again to nats 2 mins later > 5 rebills gone 5 left

I see shit like that all the time on tons of sponsors..
Comment
marketsmart

HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER

Join Date: Dec 2004

Posts: 20419
Share

Post
#17

08-24-2006, 09:11 PM

Originally posted by spacedog

so, how did this 3rd party notice discrepancies between ccbill stats & nats stats if the 3rd party only has nats stats?

i thought u were actually going in a different direction. something that may be anotheoption that no one has mentioned yet....
Comment
Jace

FBOP Class Of 2013

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 35562
Share

Post
#18

08-24-2006, 09:14 PM

Originally posted by spacedog

so, how did this 3rd party notice discrepancies between ccbill stats & nats stats if the 3rd party only has nats stats?

i think that is something we will just have to find out as time progresses
Comment
Jace

FBOP Class Of 2013

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 35562
Share

Post
#19

08-24-2006, 09:15 PM

Originally posted by marketsmart

i thought u were actually going in a different direction. something that may be anotheoption that no one has mentioned yet....

haha, yeah...no shit...the big pink elephant in the room, huh? hahahaha
Comment
marketsmart

HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER

Join Date: Dec 2004

Posts: 20419
Share

Post
#20

08-24-2006, 09:17 PM

Originally posted by Jace

haha, yeah...no shit...the big pink elephant in the room, huh? hahahaha

think multiple accts.. that is all i will say....
Comment
spacedog

Yes that IS me. Bitch.

Join Date: Nov 2001

Posts: 14149
Share

Post
#21

08-24-2006, 09:17 PM

Originally posted by Jace

haha, yeah...no shit...the big pink elephant in the room, huh? hahahaha

you got one of those too.. cool
Comment
Adult Warden

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2006

Posts: 1822
Share

Post
#22

08-24-2006, 09:19 PM

*follows all the drama*
Comment
Tempest

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: May 2004

Posts: 10217
Share

Post
#23

08-24-2006, 09:42 PM

Originally posted by spacedog

so, how did this 3rd party notice discrepancies between ccbill stats & nats stats if the 3rd party only has nats stats?

It was "implied" it was an insider... I should re-read the thread again as well but I thought it was something like some ccbill password or id number of something was changed by Xclusive but they didn't do a full implementation and so rebills didn't track back into nats. Thus XClusive pocketed all the rebill money coming in from ccbill and the affiliates were none the wiser.
Comment
LiveDose

Show Yer Tits!

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 25792
Share

Post
#24

08-24-2006, 09:44 PM

It's interesting to read some real drama for a change.

Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal
Comment
babymaker

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 4751
Share

Post
#25

08-24-2006, 10:07 PM

I didn't realize that xclusive was 1. invite only and 2. 100% revshare no PPS so why shave too easy to get caught, something is fucked, a program with only 200 invited affiliates have to close a relationship to shave and WM's advanced enough to be doing revshare and invite programs (not chasing newbie scam BS) will notice real quick that they are missing rebills just from their average stats. I am going to trenton lol when does this start i want to watch....will be easy to get there from philly :D

$99mo Hosted CMS From ElevatedX!

ICQ 293125596
Comment
p1mpdogg

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 16714
Share

Post
#26

08-24-2006, 10:13 PM

./.......................

Last edited by p1mpdogg; 08-24-2006, 10:14 PM.

A fast fortune is easy to earn! Just go with a winner!
Comment
SiMpLe

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 3221
Share

Post
#27

08-24-2006, 10:20 PM

Originally posted by spacedog

Oh, yeah & out of all these wonderful programs, Xclusive cash "(might/could/possibly") be the ONLY one (maybe) doing it,, I'm sure there's plenty others (could be doing the same).,, personally, I think,, well, never mind what I think...

I was thinking this today following the other thread - Is XC the only nats based program with the hiccup rolling atm? I push a lot of programs using nats and I never notice anything odd, but now the question is there - sigh

Sean Holland
Vice President
OrbitalPay / Global Electronic Technology (GET)
SKYPE: iam.sean ::: sholland at orbitalpay.com
888-775-1500
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...