Interesting news maybe for 2257?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • crockett
    in a van by the river
    • May 2003
    • 76818

    #1

    Interesting news maybe for 2257?

    I just heard Obama has already holted all pending regulations put in place under the Bush admin. I wonder if that would effect the 2257 regulation that went into effect today?
    In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
  • Si
    Such Fun!
    • Feb 2008
    • 13900

    #2
    I fucking hope so!

    Comment

    • Loki
      Confirmed User
      • Feb 2004
      • 4420

      #3
      Originally posted by crockett
      I just heard Obama has already holted all pending regulations put in place under the Bush admin. I wonder if that would effect the 2257 regulation that went into effect today?
      Source please, considering that the man was JUST sworn in 7 hours ago, and then went to the parade, that just ended 10 mins ago, and is now heading to 10 balls.

      His actual "Work" don't start till 2morrow.


      -Loki-
      MAKE MONEY WITH 3D TOONS!
      Need hosting? LokiCa$h Uses Amerinoc and love them!
      Skype: LokiPorn Or Email 3dloki|at|gmail.com

      Comment

      • kane
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Aug 2001
        • 20684

        #4
        This is a pretty common thing with a new incoming president. don't be surprised if he makes some executive orders altering or overturning some of Bush's regulations.

        Is 2257 one of them? Who knows.

        Comment

        • Stephen
          Consigliere
          • Feb 2003
          • 1771

          #5
          Originally posted by kane
          This is a pretty common thing with a new incoming president. don't be surprised if he makes some executive orders altering or overturning some of Bush's regulations.

          Is 2257 one of them? Who knows.
          2257 was Clinton, not Bush

          Comment

          • crockett
            in a van by the river
            • May 2003
            • 76818

            #6
            Originally posted by vdc-Loki
            Source please, considering that the man was JUST sworn in 7 hours ago, and then went to the parade, that just ended 10 mins ago, and is now heading to 10 balls.

            His actual "Work" don't start till 2morrow.


            -Loki-

            They said it on the news on TV.
            In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

            Comment

            • crockett
              in a van by the river
              • May 2003
              • 76818

              #7
              Originally posted by Stephen
              2257 was Clinton, not Bush
              It was just redone under Bush admin. Twice
              In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

              Comment

              • kane
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Aug 2001
                • 20684

                #8
                Originally posted by crockett
                It was just redone under Bush admin. Twice
                Yep, It just came back around again about a month ago.

                Comment

                • Loki
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 4420

                  #9
                  Originally posted by crockett
                  They said it on the news on TV.
                  lol, not to sound like a dick here, but WHICH news, ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN, BBC, CBC, etc etc etc

                  and again he's only been "in charge" for less then 8 hours now, and today is ONLY ceremony shit, he don't start work till 2morrow AFTER the "morning Prayer"


                  -Loki-
                  MAKE MONEY WITH 3D TOONS!
                  Need hosting? LokiCa$h Uses Amerinoc and love them!
                  Skype: LokiPorn Or Email 3dloki|at|gmail.com

                  Comment

                  • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                    Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 38323

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Stephen
                    2257 was Clinton, not Bush
                    I don't recall any 2257 inspections under Clinton.

                    Please tell us when they occurred?

                    ADG
                    Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



                    Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

                    Comment

                    • mynameisjim
                      Confirmed User
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 2985

                      #11
                      I've heard it from several news sources, the memo did go out.

                      But I don't think it covers all laws, just things specifically put forward by the previous administration.

                      I haven't seen any details though but I think the laws are still in effect, but say the previous attorney general ordered that 100 new 2257 inspectors be hired, that would be halted. Just an example.

                      At least that's my understanding so far.
                      jim (at) amateursconvert . com Amateurs Convert

                      Comment

                      • crockett
                        in a van by the river
                        • May 2003
                        • 76818

                        #12
                        Originally posted by mynameisjim
                        I've heard it from several news sources, the memo did go out.

                        But I don't think it covers all laws, just things specifically put forward by the previous administration.

                        I haven't seen any details though but I think the laws are still in effect, but say the previous attorney general ordered that 100 new 2257 inspectors be hired, that would be halted. Just an example.

                        At least that's my understanding so far.
                        Yea it should be interresting to see what becomes of it. They did use the word "pending" in the news story (NBC News btw) so I dunno if it would cover the part of 2257 that went active today or not.
                        In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                        Comment

                        • Hotrocket
                          Confirmed User
                          • May 2004
                          • 1327

                          #13
                          Here ya go...

                          WHouse stops pending Bush regulations for review
                          WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's new administration ordered all federal agencies and departments on Tuesday to stop any pending regulations until they can be reviewed by incoming staff, halting last-minute Bush orders in their tracks.

                          "This afternoon, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel signed a memorandum sent to all agencies and departments to stop all pending regulations until a legal and policy review can be conducted by the Obama administration," the White House said in a statement issued just hours after Obama took office.

                          The review is a tool commonly used by a new administration to delay so-called "midnight regulations" put in place by a former president between the election and Inauguration Day.

                          Midnight regulations have been heavily used by recent former presidents, including the Democrat Bill Clinton, Republican George H. W. Bush, and most recently, the Republican George W. Bush.

                          Controversial late rules by the outgoing Bush administration include allowing the carrying of concealed weapons in some national parks and prohibiting medical facilities from receiving federal money for discriminating against doctors and nurses who refuse to assist with abortions or dispense contraceptives based on religious grounds.

                          Federal law requires a 60-day waiting period before any major regulatory changes become law, so some presidents try to publish new major regulations to ensure they go into effect before the new president's inauguration on January 20.

                          (Reporting by Tabassum Zakaria; Editing by Patricia Zengerle)


                          http://www.reuters.com/article/polit...e=politicsNews

                          Comment

                          • crockett
                            in a van by the river
                            • May 2003
                            • 76818

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Hotrocket
                            thanks for the link.. Yea by their explanation, it would seem that 2257 was set up as a one of these "midnight regulations" being it was set up to go into effect the day of the inauguration.
                            In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                            Comment

                            • Matt 26z
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Apr 2002
                              • 18481

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Stephen
                              2257 was Clinton, not Bush
                              2257 was under Reagan after the Tracy Lords incident.

                              Comment

                              • Loki
                                Confirmed User
                                • Feb 2004
                                • 4420

                                #16
                                Link appreciated

                                -Loki-
                                MAKE MONEY WITH 3D TOONS!
                                Need hosting? LokiCa$h Uses Amerinoc and love them!
                                Skype: LokiPorn Or Email 3dloki|at|gmail.com

                                Comment

                                • tony299
                                  lurker
                                  • Aug 2002
                                  • 57021

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Stephen
                                  2257 was Clinton, not Bush
                                  Nice try, it was November 18, 1988 Title 18 United States Code Section 2257 was reenacted. that would be ronnie

                                  Comment

                                  • StickyGreen
                                    .
                                    • Oct 2003
                                    • 13076

                                    #18
                                    But will he get rid of the Patriot Act? Doubt it...
                                    Refer Cam Girls and Take Home 10% of Everything They Make For Life

                                    Comment

                                    • pornlaw
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Feb 2007
                                      • 1902

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by crockett
                                      thanks for the link.. Yea by their explanation, it would seem that 2257 was set up as a one of these "midnight regulations" being it was set up to go into effect the day of the inauguration.
                                      2257 doesnt appear to be a "midnight regulation." 2257 has been around long before the time between the election and Obama taking office.
                                      Michael

                                      www.AdultBizLaw.com

                                      Comment

                                      • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                                        Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
                                        • Jul 2004
                                        • 38323

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Stephen
                                        2257 was Clinton, not Bush
                                        Originally posted by crockett
                                        It was just redone under Bush admin. Twice
                                        Originally posted by kane
                                        Yep, It just came back around again about a month ago.
                                        Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                                        I don't recall any 2257 inspections under Clinton.

                                        Please tell us when they occurred?

                                        ADG
                                        Originally posted by Matt 26z
                                        2257 was under Reagan after the Traci Lords incident.
                                        Originally posted by tony404
                                        Nice try, it was November 18, 1988 Title 18 United States Code Section 2257 was reenacted. that would be ronnie
                                        What do you do in adult?!? j/k

                                        ADG
                                        Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



                                        Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

                                        Comment

                                        • kane
                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                          • Aug 2001
                                          • 20684

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                                          What do you do in adult?!? j/k

                                          ADG
                                          I won't speak for the others, but me? I surf tube sites, troll boards and stalk pornstars on Myspace

                                          Comment

                                          • SmokeyTheBear
                                            ►SouthOfHeaven
                                            • Jun 2004
                                            • 28609

                                            #22
                                            Federal Register: December 18, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 244)]
                                            [Rules and Regulations]
                                            [Page 77431-77472]
                                            From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
                                            [DOCID:fr18de08-24]


                                            [[Page 77431]]

                                            -----------------------------------------------------------------------

                                            Part V





                                            Department of Justice





                                            -----------------------------------------------------------------------



                                            28 CFR Part 75



                                            Revised Regulations for Records Relating to Visual Depictions of
                                            Sexually Explicit Conduct; Inspection of Records Relating to Depiction
                                            of Simulated Sexually Explicit Performance; Final Rule


                                            [[Page 77432]]
                                            hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                            Comment

                                            • SmokeyTheBear
                                              ►SouthOfHeaven
                                              • Jun 2004
                                              • 28609

                                              #23
                                              SUMMARY: This rule finalizes two proposed rules and amends the record-
                                              keeping, labeling, and inspection requirements to account for changes
                                              in the underlying statute made by Congress in enacting the Adam Walsh
                                              Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006.

                                              DATES: This rule is effective January 20, 2009. Compliance date: The
                                              requirements of this rule apply to producers of visual depictions of
                                              the lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of a person and
                                              producers of simulated sexually explicit conduct as of March 18, 2009.

                                              FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Oosterbaan, Chief, Child
                                              Exploitation and Obscenity section, Criminal Division, United States
                                              Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530; (202) 514-5780. This is
                                              not a toll-free number.
                                              hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                              Comment

                                              • SmokeyTheBear
                                                ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                • Jun 2004
                                                • 28609

                                                #24
                                                http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-29677.htm
                                                hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                Comment

                                                • DamageX
                                                  Marketing & Strategy
                                                  • Jun 2001
                                                  • 14293

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by Matt 26z
                                                  2257 was under Reagan after the Tracy Lords incident.
                                                  Keep going guys, soon we'll have had 2257 pre-date the Great Depression and be one of the causes for it!
                                                  Whitehat is for chumps

                                                  If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!

                                                  Comment

                                                  • my2257
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • May 2005
                                                    • 110

                                                    #26
                                                    Supreme Court refused to hear Goverments appeal of 6th Courts ruling on the Communications Decency Act which was ruled as unconstitutional . Has NOTHING to do with Obama!

                                                    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090121/...ernet_blocking

                                                    Comment

                                                    Working...