The Best Video Formats?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MarkTiarra
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2002
    • 3833

    #1

    The Best Video Formats?

    I've been having quite a few clients lately asking about video delivery methods so I figured I'd make this nice little page so I don't have to answer the same question 5 times a week. =]

    After constant tweaking and upgrading and re-tweaking and research on what is selling/retaining... this is the convention we are currently going with. I'm sure there are 100 other opinions out there but this is what has show the best numerical results for our sample data. I hope you find it useful. I'm sure the discussion and other opinions on here will be just as enlightening as the sample.

    http://guaranteeddesigns.com/promotools/boards/vid/

    Retired Pornosticator
  • stickyfingerz
    Doin fine
    • Oct 2005
    • 24984

    #2
    Excellent Mark. This has been a hot topic as of late. Going to give it a read now.

    Comment

    • Jace
      FBOP Class Of 2013
      • Jan 2004
      • 35562

      #3
      damn dude, thanks for the shiznit

      Comment

      • stickyfingerz
        Doin fine
        • Oct 2005
        • 24984

        #4
        Btw have you seen anything on the newest real format? I have a few downloaded cough cough movies in the new real format that are around 200mb, and the quality matches or exceeds that of .wmv and .mpg. Ive got some mp4 that is also amazing quality vs size.

        Oh the real extension is .rmvb
        Last edited by stickyfingerz; 08-17-2006, 05:59 PM.

        Comment

        • MarkTiarra
          Confirmed User
          • Aug 2002
          • 3833

          #5
          Originally posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
          Btw have you seen anything on the newest real format? I have a few downloaded cough cough movies in the new real format that are around 200mb, and the quality matches or exceeds that of .wmv and .mpg. Ive got some mp4 that is also amazing quality vs size.
          Haven't seen the new Real yet. We reevaluate every 4 months or so as formats come out and the like. WMV has consistently had the best quality for size amazingly enough. The other thing to consider is how widespread the format is.

          Retired Pornosticator

          Comment

          • MarkTiarra
            Confirmed User
            • Aug 2002
            • 3833

            #6
            ::bump:: For the late night crowd.

            Retired Pornosticator

            Comment

            • jact
              Confirmed User
              • Sep 2002
              • 9134

              #7
              Thanks for the page Mark, I've been trying to find something to back up my opinions and this will do nicely. Mind if I hit you up in the near future to discuss FLV a little more in depth? Would greatly appreciate it.
              Free agent

              Comment

              • MarkTiarra
                Confirmed User
                • Aug 2002
                • 3833

                #8
                Originally posted by jact
                Thanks for the page Mark, I've been trying to find something to back up my opinions and this will do nicely. Mind if I hit you up in the near future to discuss FLV a little more in depth? Would greatly appreciate it.
                Any time buddy, any time!

                Retired Pornosticator

                Comment

                • NoWhErE
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Sep 2005
                  • 10583

                  #9
                  Hey as long as it works for ya, even though u have the Sorenson Watermarks all over it
                  skype: lordofthecameltoe

                  Comment

                  • MarkTiarra
                    Confirmed User
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 3833

                    #10
                    Originally posted by NoWhErE
                    Hey as long as it works for ya, even though u have the Sorenson Watermarks all over it
                    Umm yeah... those aren't on the ones I use final, I was a) giving them their plug and b) too lazy to go down to the office where I have the registered version to finish this page. =]

                    Retired Pornosticator

                    Comment

                    • jonesy
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 6688

                      #11
                      good shit mark - its good to know others are on the same page and also share ideas, info ect.

                      good seeing you for a few min at internext wouldve like to have hung a bit and talked some music - catch you at one of the upcoming shows!
                      .
                      Shooting Bikini Girls

                      Comment

                      • SGS
                        Confirmed User
                        • Dec 2002
                        • 5176

                        #12
                        Looks good Mark and excellent post. We have used Discreet Cleaner for years to format video but have been thinking of checking out Sorenson for a while. Would be interested to see how they compare.
                        See sig...

                        Comment

                        • notabook
                          Confirmed User
                          • Apr 2006
                          • 9748

                          #13
                          The absolute best vid codecs for quality vs. size would have to be VP7 and H264 in my opinion. H264 is extremely slow but gives you just about the best quality you can get? and VP7 can under most circumstances even outperform H264, but it makes H264 look like a fucking roadrunner. VP7 is probably the slowest codec to encode with. As of now, I?m able to get near-dvd quality at around 190mb per hour of video when using VP7, but it?s just not worth the time it takes to do each video? takes roughly 16 hours per hour of video =\

                          Of course none of these choices are viable in the porn market, but they are just about the best thing available in my opinion.

                          Comment

                          • pics_manager
                            Registered User
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 37

                            #14
                            we hav 1280-720 and 4000 kbps WMW - quality id pretty good - you can see examples in our HDv site
                            http://picsmasters.com - Photo content
                            http://hdvadultstore.com HD video content

                            Comment

                            • LadyMischief
                              Orgasms N Such!
                              • Sep 2002
                              • 18135

                              #15
                              Bump for the day crew, great post.

                              ICQ 3522039
                              Content Manager - orgasm.com
                              [email protected]

                              Comment

                              • The Captain
                                Confirmed User
                                • Sep 2005
                                • 1558

                                #16
                                I was just trying to decide what to do about this very subject yesterday thanks alot!
                                Make Your Money Go | Make Your Traffic Go

                                Comment

                                • Brad Gosse
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jan 2002
                                  • 2616

                                  #17
                                  Great post and info. I hear good things about Sorenson Squeeze.

                                  We use Compressor on the Mac so we can encode to our render farm of compression machines.

                                  I wish Sorenson offered a clustering option so you can add more machines to increase output.
                                  Free Clipart

                                  Comment

                                  • xcitecash
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Nov 2005
                                    • 801

                                    #18
                                    great info... one further thing is ...What size would you go for using widescreen ?

                                    Comment

                                    • MarkTiarra
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Aug 2002
                                      • 3833

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by SGS
                                      Looks good Mark and excellent post. We have used Discreet Cleaner for years to format video but have been thinking of checking out Sorenson for a while. Would be interested to see how they compare.
                                      Cleaner is damn good but it just rips so much slower for me and the quality from SOrenson has matched. I think though Cleaner will let you network render right?

                                      Retired Pornosticator

                                      Comment

                                      • MarkTiarra
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Aug 2002
                                        • 3833

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by xcitecash
                                        great info... one further thing is ...What size would you go for using widescreen ?
                                        That one is 740x408 off my HD cam. I don't think there is any need to go larger than 8xx. Us webmasters know that HD video translated onto a PC doesn' mean nearly as much as it does on TV but that doesn't mean your surfers aren't all wowed by the term and willing to join more readily because you have it.

                                        Retired Pornosticator

                                        Comment

                                        • GUNNER
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • May 2001
                                          • 2115

                                          #21
                                          man, that's good stuff Mark... good seeing ya again in FL too.
                                          gunner @tutamail.com
                                          25 years in the jizz biz

                                          Comment

                                          • MarkTiarra
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Aug 2002
                                            • 3833

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by GUNNER
                                            man, that's good stuff Mark... good seeing ya again in FL too.
                                            You too man. One of these days I gotta spend some time in Chicago and you can show me some good places to eat. Are there a decent number of webmasters out by you? You are the only one I know of out that way.

                                            Retired Pornosticator

                                            Comment

                                            • BobG
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Nov 2003
                                              • 4274

                                              #23
                                              Good shit Mark.

                                              Comment

                                              Working...