Originally posted by Chris
Statement From Xclusivecash
Collapse
X
-
You must be fucking kidding. And 150 or 200 or whatever.Make money offa that Asian honey - www.eroticmp.com. -
-
I have a feeling you didn't read much on both threads, right?Originally posted by Purple HazeEveryone-just give Xclusivecash a few days to settle things - coming home to this will take some time to sort out. This is an outstanding program with good, solid honest people running the program.
Purple Haze
Your comment is just as much as a joke.Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!Comment
-
Then why haven't they defended themselves more? Why haven't they provided screenshots of CCBill numbers that they paid? Why hasn't this been sorted out?Originally posted by Purple HazeChris,
I know how those phone calls are when you are travelling home and can't do anything on the road. Everyone-just give Xclusivecash a few days to settle things - coming home to this will take some time to sort out. This is an outstanding program with good, solid honest people running the program.
Purple Haze
I would think if I were accused of shaving, I would have proof I didn't as quickly as possible. I would be on the phone non-stop to get it straightened out and prove that I wasn't a thief. Why are we almost a week into this without a response with substance?Comment
-
well saidOriginally posted by pocketkangarooThen why haven't they defended themselves more? Why haven't they provided screenshots of CCBill numbers that they paid? Why hasn't this been sorted out?
I would think if I were accused of shaving, I would have proof I didn't as quickly as possible. I would be on the phone non-stop to get it straightened out and prove that I wasn't a thief. Why are we almost a week into this without a response with substance?Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!Comment
-
Nice, there are always 2 sides of the story.
SOLOGIRLPAYS.COM
Very Hot Solo Girls now paying 50% sales,rebills and 10% webmaster referral.
Free Hosted Galleries are ready to go !!Comment
-
daym tucker good luck man if there is anything we can do to help let me know...
~ Webair Dedicated Cloud Serversâ„¢ ~ WEBAIR VSYSâ„¢ Virtual Hosting Platform ~ Superior CDN Network ~
~ Managed Dedicated hosting Specialists ~ DISCOUNT DOMAIN NAMES! ~ WEBAIR FUSION IO MANAGED CLOUD SERVERS! ~
ICQ: 243116321 - TWITTER - @WEBAIRINC - E-Mail: [email protected]Comment
-
it does make you wonder doesn't it?Originally posted by pocketkangarooThen why haven't they defended themselves more? Why haven't they provided screenshots of CCBill numbers that they paid? Why hasn't this been sorted out?
I would think if I were accused of shaving, I would have proof I didn't as quickly as possible. I would be on the phone non-stop to get it straightened out and prove that I wasn't a thief. Why are we almost a week into this without a response with substance?Comment
-
There is nothing to 'wonder' about my children.
The holy NATS has exposed these lucifers. They are hiding, planning the next move, beware being bitten twice by the snake of poisonous greed.GFY Nick of the Year - 2006
Holy figure/Spirit of the year - 0000AC - 2006ACComment
-
Hmm, its been 3 days and not one reply yet. You'd think with claims as damaging as this to a company, that they would be trying to respond to questions and offering explainations pronto !Originally Posted by NakedRhino_Chris
We will not be adding to the posts or participating in a public discussion on this issue until all of the facts have been looked at.Comment
-
Yep fucked up for sure... Me thinks they are trying to be tricky and the situation will take an intresting turn.Originally posted by CoatsyHmm, its been 3 days and not one reply yet. You'd think with claims as damaging as this to a company, that they would be trying to respond to questions and offering explainations pronto !Comment
-
Not even a resolution... how about a responce, I think they have had more then enough time to look "into" the issue and come back with a yep there was an issue here is your money or nope no issue your all crazy please carry on! The longer it goes unanswerd the more it hurts their own reputation... They think NATS did damage? HA making a thread like this and never comming back just pretty much put the gun to your own head!Originally posted by QbertDitto, and the smell just keeps getting worse the longer this goes on without resolution
Comment
-
i sure hope SonofJesus' posts areOriginally posted by scottybuzzi wonder if this post (my post) will be read out in court ? lmfao

Comment
-
Did I just see a post from John in here about how they verified this as true? I don't have any horse in this race, but I did spend two years as one of the VP's at CCBill, and back then, our contract was with the MERCHANT. Not with any third party software vendor.
What does that mean, some of you may be asking yourselves right about now? Well, that means that other than the NR folks, NO ONE would have access to their CCBill account UNLESS they had given them access to it. I can't, in any real sense, imagine that CCBill has changed their contract to allow others to access accounts that don't belong to them.
In that case, did NATS have access to NR's CCBill account at some point? And was that access limited to whatever they needed in the install process? Or is there something in the NATS terms that say you have to give them ongoing access to your processing accounts?
And the fact that NATS is basically holding sales hostage so that no affiliates get paid at the moment is what this appears to be in my eyes.
As I said above, I don't have any particular interest in either party... and I'm not saying that either party is right, or that either party is telling the whole story. I just find this odd beyond belief that something could be verified through CCBill without the account owner allowing access either on an unlimited basis or specifically at different times and it doesn't really sound to me as if Chris, on his drive from FL to NC, would have called up CCBill and authorized NATS to access his account. Nor does it sound like he would have given NATS a user pass to that account if he was angry and hung up on them.
I'm sure there's ALOT more to this story than meets the eye.Comment
-
I am pretty sure at this point that they shaved..
The piling up of rebills not being notice is BULLSHIT!ISeekGirls.com since 2005Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gooddomainswhat's the outcome of this ?
they be snakes on a plane muffukah!
Comment
-
NATS can tell from simply looking at the billers logs on the server that NATS keeps and then checking the # of rebills that shows up in the admin of the sponsors NATS install.
there's no way CCBILL gave em access to the webmaster CCBILL account, never happened, no freakin way, if they did CCBILL would get sued so fast.
Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.comComment
-
NATS would have the billing logs handy for every program they process for if they wanted to peruse them?Originally posted by gleemNATS can tell from simply looking at the billers logs on the server that NATS keeps and then checking the # of rebills that shows up in the admin of the sponsors NATS install.
there's no way CCBILL gave em access to the webmaster CCBILL account, never happened, no freakin way, if they did CCBILL would get sued so fast.
I'm stunned.Comment
-
you'll learn something new every dayOriginally posted by KimmykimNATS would have the billing logs handy for every program they process for if they wanted to peruse them?
I'm stunned.Comment
-
unless there was a supoena involved, in which ccbill would have to turn over the #'sOriginally posted by gleemNATS can tell from simply looking at the billers logs on the server that NATS keeps and then checking the # of rebills that shows up in the admin of the sponsors NATS install.
there's no way CCBILL gave em access to the webmaster CCBILL account, never happened, no freakin way, if they did CCBILL would get sued so fast.Comment
-
I'd imagine a subpoeanas wouldnt be needed, I mean if I was NRM would be pulling my CCbill stats and compare to what NATS has.. if numbers match up... there's no problem, and if there's nothing to hide it wouldn't take a supoena or 3 days to get that doneOriginally posted by gleemare you saying that TMM subpoenaed CCBIll to see their stats? If you think that I'd suggest you stick to your tinfoil hat club ;)Last edited by Jace; 08-16-2006, 02:37 PM.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by KimmykimI'm sure there's ALOT more to this story than meets the eye.
Great post KimmyKim and I agree there is a whole lot more to this story than what's in the thread. Something stinks here beyond the surface. This to me appears to be part of a larger picture...Comment
-
well, now that it has been days and there hasn't been any resolution, I imagine there is WAY more to this story than what we are seeingOriginally posted by LiveDoseGreat post KimmyKim and I agree there is a whole lot more to this story than what's in the thread. Something stinks here beyond the surface. This to me appears to be part of a larger picture...
if I was a company accused of shaving, I would want to clear it up ASAP....doesn't seem lik xclusive is even trying to clear it all upComment
-
The assumptions people are making seem funny to me.
Especially you Jace given the quote in your sig. The idea that somebody is guilty just because they aren't on gfy rolling in the mud seems ludicrous.
For all anybody here knows, their lawyer told them that it would be a bad idea for them to post about the subject as they prepare their suit.
Do you assume every person who gets involved in a legal battle and says "No comment" is secretly saying "I'm guilty" ? Of course not, anything they say can be brought up in court.
I have NO idea what happened in the situation, I haven't talked to anybody about it, but what I do know is that one person (john) posted one thing in a thread, the gfy witch hunt started, and lawyers got involved.
There is nothing xclusivecash can post here to help themselves out here. If they say "we didnt do it" everybody will scream that they are liars. If they say "we did it on accident" everybody will scream that they are liars. If they say "we did it on purpose" everybody will scream that they are theives.
This is really a lot like the witch hunts, throw them in the water... if they float their witches, if they drown they werent. Until I hear a recording of the phone call I'm not going to assume that the guy was "rude" and screamed profanity before hanging up.
You keep indicating that you know a lot more than you're letting on... so if you have more information then why not share it instead of just pouring gas on the fire and participating in a witch hunt.Comment
-
-
Because they're not... They cared more about sueing NATs than making sure their affiliates got/get paid.Originally posted by JaceI just noticed something about this statement that I guess I didn't catch before.....but Chris didn't say once in that statement that "we are working with NATS to have this issue resolved immediately"....Comment




Comment