Too Much Media Suspends Xclusive Cash NATS License

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vitasoy
    GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
    • Oct 2003
    • 58202

    #101
    Whoa.. glad I don't use them.


    [email protected]

    Comment

    • wyldblyss
      Confirmed User
      • Nov 2003
      • 5779

      #102
      Originally posted by jact
      Actually, was more talking about http://www.shavebucks.com/
      Sorry, no clue what you are trying to say. Usually just spitting it out is best, rather than talking in riddles

      Comment

      • Rochard
        Jägermeister Test Pilot
        • Dec 2001
        • 75761

        #103
        Originally posted by SPeRMiNaToR
        so TMM has access to their CCBill stats?
        No, of course not silly. NATS just makes up the affiliate stats.
        Herschel Savage
        Brooklyn, NY

        Comment

        • jact
          Confirmed User
          • Sep 2002
          • 9134

          #104
          Originally posted by wyldblyss
          Sorry, no clue what you are trying to say. Usually just spitting it out is best, rather than talking in riddles
          I don't remember either.
          Free agent

          Comment

          • Theo
            HAL 9000
            • May 2001
            • 34515

            #105
            Originally posted by Rochard
            No, of course not silly. NATS just makes up the affiliate stats.

            Comment

            • Degenerate
              Confirmed User
              • May 2006
              • 1294

              #106
              I wonder what king of lawsuits COULD come out of this... crazy drama thread....


              Im staying on the fence for now...
              .

              Comment

              • jayeff
                Confirmed User
                • May 2001
                • 2944

                #107
                Originally posted by wyldblyss
                The only problem I have is them taking it to the public BEFORE they are proof positive something nasty is going on that they are PURPOSELY doing. It is the old "innocent until proven guilty".
                Maybe before adding more to what passes here for drama you might want to read the post on which you are commenting?

                Nowhere does it make any accusations, talk about anything "nasty", nor make judgements about intent. Both posts NATS made in this thread simply report events.

                Comment

                • Rice_Master
                  Confirmed User
                  • Mar 2001
                  • 1582

                  #108
                  Dammm... crazy shit, but it's nice to see NATS checking those numbers, good people over there. Good stuff John.
                  Icq: 31706665

                  Comment

                  • xclusive
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Apr 2004
                    • 35218

                    #109
                    Originally posted by mailman
                    YEPPERS!

                    I hate to see it since I have made a nice chunk of change with Xclusive over the years but if this is true id rather not make anymore and rid the scum.. so we just have to wait and see what happens and I respect the stance TMM has made in the situation!
                    Just for the record, I'm the kinder gentler Xclusive and I only shave my balls

                    I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /


                    Comment

                    • Jace
                      FBOP Class Of 2013
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 35562

                      #110
                      just bumping this for the sake of the bump

                      anyone got a beer?

                      Comment

                      • Adult Warden
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Jul 2006
                        • 1822

                        #111
                        Hey John,

                        Glad to see you are standing up for the industry. Some people are quick to just glance over your post instead of reading it entirely. That would be a quick red flag to me if when I approached a company using my software started telling me off and acting like a 12 y/o...

                        GLAD TO SEE YOUR LOOKING OUT FOR THE INDUSTRY...

                        Obviously you wouldn't put your company out there in a possibly bad way if not first getting all your ducks in a row...Thats what some people don't seem to realize...

                        Thanks!

                        Comment

                        • SonOfJesus
                          Registered User
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 47

                          #112
                          I, the lamb of the lord of jesus, will make a prediction on the end results of the consequences of the greedy hearts of NR Media.

                          My steps, as with the stages of the cross suffered by my divine father, will provide informations and wisdoms on what will be happening.

                          Stage One - Pontious Pilate condemns Jesus to death
                          NATS strikes into the hearts of the greedy ones by posting their investigation results on GFY. The worlds of the webmasters of the interwebs are told what has happened to their shrinking paychecks.

                          Jesus is given the cross to carry
                          NR Media is given the cross, the burden of defending their greedy actions.

                          Jesus falls under the weight of the cross
                          The masters of the interwebs are not fooled by the claims of "mistakes" and other sham reasonings. NR Media collapses under the weight of its own greed.

                          Jesus meets his mother, Mary
                          Secret conversations occur, attempts and plans are made to salvage what is left of this proverbial piece of steaming doo-doo. The greedy hearts will seek informations from lawyers.

                          Simon of Cyrene is forced to carry the cross for Jesus
                          The faitful employees of the past are dragged into the mess by deflections from the truly greedy masters of the program. Only a few of the sheep will believe these attempts at deflection, glass can only bounce so many rocks off it so many times before breaking. The truth is known that the past employees are as clean as the children of christ. AMEN.

                          Veronica wipes Jesus' face
                          Pleas are made by the female partner of the greediest heart of hearts. The children of Jesus will ignore the pleas. Greedy hearts, aching and burning, will retreat into the dark caves of squalor.

                          Jesus falls for a second time
                          NATS investigation has been completed. The informations and teachings are available for all. If the hearts are opened, the wallets will realize the sums of earnings missing. Rocks and burning sticks will be thrown at those who took the dishonest path. The monies missing will not be worth the suffering. Reputations are at a point of no return.

                          Jesus speaks to the women of Jerusalem
                          Making a last plea from the emails and interwebs http sites, the greedy hearts attempt one last time to reconcile. The sin is too great, Jesus' son has made the informations known; no one will be forgiven.

                          Jesus falls for a third time
                          Failing to settle on past accounts owed money that was missing from the greedy hearts of the lucifers, civil actions are launched against those who stolen from the webmasters of interwebs.

                          His clothes are stripped from him
                          Judgement of the civil courts is granted. Lucifers are left with nothing beyond the blackened hearts. AMEN. End is near for the cowards and greed lusters.

                          He is nailed to the cross
                          The cheating programs of the lucifers with the blackend hearts is no longer operating. The site says nothing more than the messages of "sorry, we are the greedy ones" in twenty differnt languages. The world is known, the cheaters are ruined by their own addiction to the gold pockets.

                          Jesus dies on the cross
                          The threads drop to the bottom of the interwbs. Off page one, the webmasters return to hard work and labours in the name of the son of Jesus.

                          Jesus is taken from the cross to be buried in Joseph of Arimathea's tomb
                          Forver known as 'cheaters' 'blackened hearts' and 'lucifers' the NR Media is banished. The sites in the webs are worth no more than the worth of two loaves of bread. Tainted, no one wants to re-build and the persons and websites fade away forever.

                          Greed has caused ruin. Allow yourselves to be open to the informations from the CCBILL and the NATS. You will be blessed and the lucifers will suffer in the wake of their actions of self-interest and greed of new levels.

                          Bless you all.

                          Jesus shall return. The disciples have promised new informations.
                          GFY Nick of the Year - 2006
                          Holy figure/Spirit of the year - 0000AC - 2006AC

                          Comment

                          • jayeff
                            Confirmed User
                            • May 2001
                            • 2944

                            #113
                            Originally posted by Rice_Master
                            Dammm... crazy shit, but it's nice to see NATS checking those numbers, good people over there.
                            Maybe you shouldn't be quite so happy.

                            1. NATS followed up on one or more third-party reports. That is good, but by extension it means that they themselves had not caught the "discrepancies".

                            2. It means that although we can rely on NATS stepping in if discrepancies are spotted, their system in fact allows them to happen. A step in the right direction, but not perhaps the solid protection affiliates might have believed they were getting.

                            Comment

                            • Phoenix
                              BACON BACON BACON
                              • Nov 2002
                              • 35475

                              #114
                              interesting thread
                              Telegram PhoenixBrad
                              https://quantads.io

                              Comment

                              • CreamXtreme
                                Registered User
                                • Jan 2006
                                • 60

                                #115
                                Seems Nutz to Me

                                To put out so much cash and then pull any form of stunt
                                to loose out in the end.

                                Don't know much about the situation to make any real
                                comment other than what is said here:

                                Company B buys license from Company A for a set
                                amount of dollars to play in the game and then
                                fumbles the ball at the 20 yard line, with little or
                                no chance of recovering the ball.

                                Can't win no games playing like that!

                                Nick

                                Comment

                                • BoyAlley
                                  So Fucking Gay
                                  • Nov 2004
                                  • 19714

                                  #116
                                  Originally posted by xclusive
                                  Just for the record, I'm the kinder gentler Xclusive and I only shave my balls
                                  Always glad to hear reports of breeders cleaning up their nads. Good job!

                                  Comment

                                  • Serge Litehead
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Dec 2002
                                    • 5190

                                    #117
                                    my impression was if program caught shaving nats would terminate the license not suspend it. in my thinking it's not 100% verified shaving, peeps around here too fast to jump into assumptions. dropping the phone call is suspicious though in the light of this event.

                                    Comment

                                    • ShaveBucks
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Mar 2005
                                      • 467

                                      #118
                                      Originally posted by jact
                                      Actually, was more talking about http://www.shavebucks.com/

                                      Comment

                                      • modF
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Aug 2002
                                        • 1888

                                        #119
                                        Originally posted by CreamXtreme
                                        To put out so much cash and then pull any form of stunt
                                        to loose out in the end.

                                        Don't know much about the situation to make any real
                                        comment other than what is said here:

                                        Company B buys license from Company A for a set
                                        amount of dollars to play in the game and then
                                        fumbles the ball at the 20 yard line, with little or
                                        no chance of recovering the ball.

                                        Can't win no games playing like that!

                                        Nick
                                        YOu left out Company A tries to contact Company B about the issue and Company B refuses. Company A then does what it has to do to protect it's ass.

                                        I do things
                                        skype:themodF

                                        Comment

                                        • SonOfJesus
                                          Registered User
                                          • Aug 2006
                                          • 47

                                          #120
                                          Suspicions are the beliefs of the closed minded children.

                                          Open your hearts - Open your minds

                                          Awareness shall bring increase in the thickness of the wallet.

                                          Do not forgive or forget the sins of the greedy hearts.

                                          Blessed is NATS for showing us the light. We will travel to the chosen lands.
                                          GFY Nick of the Year - 2006
                                          Holy figure/Spirit of the year - 0000AC - 2006AC

                                          Comment

                                          • wyldblyss
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Nov 2003
                                            • 5779

                                            #121
                                            Originally posted by jayeff
                                            Maybe before adding more to what passes here for drama you might want to read the post on which you are commenting?

                                            Nowhere does it make any accusations, talk about anything "nasty", nor make judgements about intent. Both posts NATS made in this thread simply report events.
                                            I read it, and I stand by what I said. No announcement should have been made until NATS had the entire story.

                                            Perhaps you don't read...if you did you would see people post things like "wow, glad I don't use them" etc. People are automatically assuming that there is shaving, whether the "announcement" said it or not. Therefore, I believe that they should have said NOTHING until they knew the entire situation.

                                            NATS knew exactly what they were doing and what people would think when they made that announcement. They want to look like the sponsor police and get all the webmasters to insist that all the sponsors use NATS (cause nats cares!!!) Personally, I don't like to see that much power in ANY ONE companies hands.
                                            Last edited by wyldblyss; 08-10-2006, 06:59 PM.

                                            Comment

                                            • Super Negro
                                              So Fucking Banned
                                              • Aug 2006
                                              • 215

                                              #122
                                              I am not pointing any fingers here, well maybe I am, but what if Xclusiv was informed that there was a glitch that didn't allow anyone to recieve any rebill credit, and instead of making good with that decided to shun their former partners who were trying to be honest, and take all that rebill money and hope no one notices.....

                                              Comment

                                              • jayeff
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • May 2001
                                                • 2944

                                                #123
                                                Originally posted by wyldblyss
                                                NATS knew exactly what they were doing and what people would think when they made that announcement.
                                                No doubt. But should NATS sublimate their own interests because the mental age of many GFY posters is still in single digits?

                                                They are picking up some (mainly) good PR and sending out a message that if we call you about an issue like this and you swear at us and hang up, this is what will happen. Good for them: this industry would be a whole lot healthier if more people had a few principles and stood by them.

                                                Comment

                                                • BluMedia
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Dec 2002
                                                  • 3973

                                                  #124
                                                  Nats contacted us once about CCbill rebills not being posted to webmasters stats. We responded to them right away and they fixed the problem. I don't know why anyone would just curse and hangup on the company responsible for their affiliate software. Everyone was bitching about shaving and now finally a company stands up and people still bitch. I am sure Nats has exhausted all means to correct this problem before posting this thread.

                                                  Mark
                                                  IntenseCash - If you can't convert us then you might want to look for a new job
                                                  .
                                                  BrokeStraightBoys.com converting 1:124 stats counted by Nats

                                                  Comment

                                                  • wyldblyss
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Nov 2003
                                                    • 5779

                                                    #125
                                                    Originally posted by jayeff
                                                    No doubt. But should NATS sublimate their own interests because the mental age of many GFY posters is still in single digits?

                                                    They are picking up some (mainly) good PR and sending out a message that if we call you about an issue like this and you swear at us and hang up, this is what will happen. Good for them: this industry would be a whole lot healthier if more people had a few principles and stood by them.
                                                    So they are putting their foot down and saying "you better fucking learn who is boss around here...when we call you, you better be at attention, kiss our ass or we will make a post on GFY and ruin you, whether you did anything wrong or not"

                                                    Uhm, I don't like how that sounds. They might be impressing the hell out of webmasters right now...but I know for certain they have a few program owners shaking their heads. So these guys keep pulling this crap...don't you think completely honest programs are going to shy away from NATS simply because one day NATS just might make a mistake and ruin your company by making inappropriate comments on boards PRIOR to getting all the facts?

                                                    Where does it stop when NATS has such an iron fist on everything...do they keep uppping and upping their price and sponsors feeling forced into paying it because they don't want to give the impression they are leaving nats because of shaving?

                                                    Programs such as NATS are great, but they lost a whole lot of credibility in my eyes today by making a very premature announcement.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Degenerate
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • May 2006
                                                      • 1294

                                                      #126
                                                      Originally posted by Super Negro
                                                      I am not pointing any fingers here, well maybe I am, but what if Xclusiv was informed that there was a glitch that didn't allow anyone to recieve any rebill credit, and instead of making good with that decided to shun their former partners who were trying to be honest, and take all that rebill money and hope no one notices.....
                                                      THAT scares the shit amount me when a guy with ONE POST says that.

                                                      Normally "one post wonders", have a point when they aren't just screwing around.

                                                      Mind telling us who you are?
                                                      .

                                                      Comment

                                                      • spacedog
                                                        Yes that IS me. Bitch.
                                                        • Nov 2001
                                                        • 14149

                                                        #127
                                                        Originally posted by pocketkangaroo
                                                        Is this the professional way of saying Xclusivecash was shaving?
                                                        nats is shave proof..

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Jace
                                                          FBOP Class Of 2013
                                                          • Jan 2004
                                                          • 35562

                                                          #128
                                                          crazy shit I tell ya!

                                                          Comment

                                                          • modF
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Aug 2002
                                                            • 1888

                                                            #129
                                                            Originally posted by wyldblyss
                                                            Uhm, I don't like how that sounds. They might be impressing the hell out of webmasters right now...but I know for certain they have a few program owners shaking their heads. So these guys keep pulling this crap...don't you think completely honest programs are going to shy away from NATS simply because one day NATS just might make a mistake and ruin your company by making inappropriate comments on boards PRIOR to getting all the facts?
                                                            You keep saying the same bullshit, they TRIED to contact them and get all of the facts. IF the honest program owner doesn't have a problem, then they would get it cleared up in private and TMM would not revoke their license. There are suspicions on their part, so they are protecting their brand just like any other company would.

                                                            I do things
                                                            skype:themodF

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Super Negro
                                                              So Fucking Banned
                                                              • Aug 2006
                                                              • 215

                                                              #130
                                                              Originally posted by wyldblyss
                                                              I read it, and I stand by what I said. No announcement should have been made until NATS had the entire story.

                                                              Perhaps you don't read...if you did you would see people post things like "wow, glad I don't use them" etc. People are automatically assuming that there is shaving, whether the "announcement" said it or not. Therefore, I believe that they should have said NOTHING until they knew the entire situation.

                                                              NATS knew exactly what they were doing and what people would think when they made that announcement. They want to look like the sponsor police and get all the webmasters to insist that all the sponsors use NATS (cause nats cares!!!) Personally, I don't like to see that much power in ANY ONE companies hands.
                                                              well, I don't know shit, well maybe I do, but I seriously doubt that NATS would shut down a well known company if they didn't already have enough data and info to go public with

                                                              you don't shut an entire company down overnight unless you speak to your lawyers first ;)

                                                              Comment

                                                              • uno
                                                                RIP Dodger. BEST.CAT.EVER
                                                                • Dec 2002
                                                                • 18450

                                                                #131
                                                                Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
                                                                John made a careful statement
                                                                Absolutely. If anyone reads anything into that, they are making assumptions.
                                                                -uno
                                                                icq: 111-914
                                                                CrazyBabe.com - porn art
                                                                MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Super Negro
                                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                                  • Aug 2006
                                                                  • 215

                                                                  #132
                                                                  Originally posted by wyldblyss
                                                                  So they are putting their foot down and saying "you better fucking learn who is boss around here...when we call you, you better be at attention, kiss our ass or we will make a post on GFY and ruin you, whether you did anything wrong or not"

                                                                  Uhm, I don't like how that sounds. They might be impressing the hell out of webmasters right now...but I know for certain they have a few program owners shaking their heads. So these guys keep pulling this crap...don't you think completely honest programs are going to shy away from NATS simply because one day NATS just might make a mistake and ruin your company by making inappropriate comments on boards PRIOR to getting all the facts?

                                                                  Where does it stop when NATS has such an iron fist on everything...do they keep uppping and upping their price and sponsors feeling forced into paying it because they don't want to give the impression they are leaving nats because of shaving?

                                                                  Programs such as NATS are great, but they lost a whole lot of credibility in my eyes today by making a very premature announcement.
                                                                  Stop think with your tin foil hat ;)

                                                                  NATS would not shut an entire operation down in a minute if they didn't have the necessary legal right to do so.

                                                                  NATS jumped up in my credibility book today when they shut down a scamming program. If you like programs stealing from you and NATS doing nothing, then that is cool, but I don't ;)

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Pornwolf
                                                                    Drunk and Unruly
                                                                    • Jan 2002
                                                                    • 22712

                                                                    #133
                                                                    I think it's safe to say Son Of Jesus is a fake nick that deserves to go into the hall of fame for Fake Nicks. Bravo.
                                                                    I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...

                                                                    Webair, bitches.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • jact
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Sep 2002
                                                                      • 9134

                                                                      #134
                                                                      Originally posted by uno
                                                                      Absolutely. If anyone reads anything into that, they are making assumptions.
                                                                      I got "You want to fuck me" from reading your post.
                                                                      Free agent

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Super Negro
                                                                        So Fucking Banned
                                                                        • Aug 2006
                                                                        • 215

                                                                        #135
                                                                        Originally posted by modF
                                                                        You keep saying the same bullshit, they TRIED to contact them and get all of the facts. IF the honest program owner doesn't have a problem, then they would get it cleared up in private and TMM would not revoke their license. There are suspicions on their part, so they are protecting their brand just like any other company would.
                                                                        Everyone should listen to this wise mans words

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Super Negro
                                                                          So Fucking Banned
                                                                          • Aug 2006
                                                                          • 215

                                                                          #136
                                                                          Originally posted by Pornwolf
                                                                          I think it's safe to say Son Of Jesus is a fake nick that deserves to go into the hall of fame for Fake Nicks. Bravo.
                                                                          Everyone needs to go back and re-read every single one of Son Of Jesus' posts right now, and read it very carefully

                                                                          VERY carefully

                                                                          EVERY word

                                                                          HINT HINT

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • ChrisExtreme
                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                            • Apr 2004
                                                                            • 993

                                                                            #137
                                                                            Originally posted by modF
                                                                            Nothing is shave proof, that's why when TMM gets a report they look into it. For all of you who seem to be demanding the truth, TMM said they tried to contact Xclusive Cash to figure out the situation. They replied with profanity and a hang up. TMM has always said that they want their software being used above board, so they have full rights to pull their license in this case.

                                                                            And this just doesn't go for TMM, the creator of whatever software always has certain provisions to pull their license. If it is all above board, then I'm sure we will be told that.
                                                                            I was being sarcastic.

                                                                            Check Out IA Cash's Newest Site Biohazard Bitches

                                                                            Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                                                            Thing is if I wanted to shave I have two full time excellent programmers who could build in a shave you would never see.

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • ChrisExtreme
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Apr 2004
                                                                              • 993

                                                                              #138
                                                                              Originally posted by mailman
                                                                              I thought you were talking about PIB the Soda!
                                                                              Does it go good with a hot dog?

                                                                              Check Out IA Cash's Newest Site Biohazard Bitches

                                                                              Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                                                              Thing is if I wanted to shave I have two full time excellent programmers who could build in a shave you would never see.

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • crockett
                                                                                in a van by the river
                                                                                • May 2003
                                                                                • 76818

                                                                                #139
                                                                                Originally posted by Pornwolf
                                                                                I think it's safe to say Son Of Jesus is a fake nick that deserves to go into the hall of fame for Fake Nicks. Bravo.
                                                                                yes he seems like a good one..
                                                                                In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • 12clicks
                                                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                  • Jan 2001
                                                                                  • 19814

                                                                                  #140
                                                                                  Originally posted by wyldblyss
                                                                                  So they are putting their foot down and saying "you better fucking learn who is boss around here...when we call you, you better be at attention, kiss our ass or we will make a post on GFY and ruin you, whether you did anything wrong or not"

                                                                                  Uhm, I don't like how that sounds. They might be impressing the hell out of webmasters right now...but I know for certain they have a few program owners shaking their heads. So these guys keep pulling this crap...don't you think completely honest programs are going to shy away from NATS simply because one day NATS just might make a mistake and ruin your company by making inappropriate comments on boards PRIOR to getting all the facts?

                                                                                  Where does it stop when NATS has such an iron fist on everything...do they keep uppping and upping their price and sponsors feeling forced into paying it because they don't want to give the impression they are leaving nats because of shaving?

                                                                                  Programs such as NATS are great, but they lost a whole lot of credibility in my eyes today by making a very premature announcement.
                                                                                  who are you and what do you do in this business?
                                                                                  from your posts, you seem to be some low level employee trying to impress the board.
                                                                                  be quiet and pay attention. It will get you further than chirping like an uneducated bird.
                                                                                  I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • KRL
                                                                                    Entrepreneur
                                                                                    • Oct 2002
                                                                                    • 31429

                                                                                    #141
                                                                                    Originally posted by mailman
                                                                                    Congrats to the winners!

                                                                                    If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
                                                                                    from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!

                                                                                    *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
                                                                                    Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • The Hoff
                                                                                      Registered User
                                                                                      • Dec 2004
                                                                                      • 12

                                                                                      #142
                                                                                      Son of Jesus is Wise.

                                                                                      The Hoff has spoken
                                                                                      My Official Website

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                                                                                        Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
                                                                                        • Jul 2004
                                                                                        • 38323

                                                                                        #143
                                                                                        Is this another all sizzle, no steak, thread???

                                                                                        I just skimmed through this thread, but I do not think I saw a response from Xclusive/Naked Rhino.

                                                                                        Looking at their numbers on Alexa, neither of the two sites in the Xclusive program (which has been in place over two years) seems to be doing well.

                                                                                        And look at this, Naked Rhino is launching a new partnership program with Falcon Foto this month - coincidence, I think prolly not...

                                                                                        NATS looks like they are outing a lone shaver, and is trying to give the impression that NATS is on the side of affiliates, and that the majority of NATS customers don't shave.

                                                                                        Keep in mind that many sponsor companies are strongly suspected to have shaved in the past, and so now claim to not be shaving since switching to NATS.

                                                                                        Even though they once shaved, they would never think of doing it again - yeah, right!

                                                                                        How convenient for NATS to attack a small player, and not have any response from that Sponsor (especially given that the Sponsor has a new program coming out, possibly under a different name).

                                                                                        What if this is all about NATS giving affiliates the false security that NATS is out to prevent shaving, when in fact it has to some extent proven that NATS Sponsors have at least one method to shave (that doesn't involve a kickback to NATS).

                                                                                        Not everything on GFY is as it appears...like several others, I find this method for communications by NATS highly suspicious.

                                                                                        ADG Webmaster
                                                                                        Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



                                                                                        Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Validus
                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                          • Jul 2001
                                                                                          • 4012

                                                                                          #144
                                                                                          I agree, it doesn?t matter what happened, this has nothing to do on a public forum. I certainly wouldn?t be impressed of my software suppliers would pull something like this.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • 12clicks
                                                                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                            • Jan 2001
                                                                                            • 19814

                                                                                            #145
                                                                                            Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                                                                                            What if this is all about NATS giving affiliates the false security that NATS is out to prevent shaving, when in fact it has to some extent proven that NATS Sponsors have at least one method to shave (that doesn't involve a kickback to NATS).
                                                                                            look, its someone who can't afford NATS.
                                                                                            I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • 12clicks
                                                                                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                              • Jan 2001
                                                                                              • 19814

                                                                                              #146
                                                                                              Originally posted by Validus
                                                                                              I agree, it doesn?t matter what happened, this has nothing to do on a public forum. I certainly wouldn?t be impressed of my software suppliers would pull something like this.
                                                                                              really?
                                                                                              If I were an affiliate, I'd want to know that a program wasn't interested in working with their stats company to solve "discrepancies"
                                                                                              I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • studiocritic
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Jun 2005
                                                                                                • 2442

                                                                                                #147
                                                                                                Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                                                                                                How convenient for NATS to attack a small player, and not have any response from that Sponsor (especially given that the Sponsor has a new program coming out, possibly under a different name).

                                                                                                What if this is all about NATS giving affiliates the false security that NATS is out to prevent shaving, when in fact it has to some extent proven that NATS Sponsors have at least one method to shave (that doesn't involve a kickback to NATS).

                                                                                                Not everything on GFY is as it appears...like several others, I find this method for communications by NATS highly suspicious.
                                                                                                That's one hell of an "accusation"..
                                                                                                254342256

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • Super Negro
                                                                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                                                                  • Aug 2006
                                                                                                  • 215

                                                                                                  #148
                                                                                                  Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                                                                                                  Is this another all sizzle, no steak, thread???

                                                                                                  I just skimmed through this thread, but I do not think I saw a response from Xclusive/Naked Rhino.

                                                                                                  Looking at their numbers on Alexa, neither of the two sites in the Xclusive program (which has been in place over two years) seems to be doing well.

                                                                                                  And look at this, Naked Rhino is launching a new partnership program with Falcon Foto this month - coincidence, I think prolly not...

                                                                                                  NATS looks like they are outing a lone shaver, and is trying to give the impression that NATS is on the side of affiliates, and that the majority of NATS customers don't shave.

                                                                                                  Keep in mind that many sponsor companies are strongly suspected to have shaved in the past, and so now claim to not be shaving since switching to NATS.

                                                                                                  Even though they once shaved, they would never think of doing it again - yeah, right!

                                                                                                  How convenient for NATS to attack a small player, and not have any response from that Sponsor (especially given that the Sponsor has a new program coming out, possibly under a different name).

                                                                                                  What if this is all about NATS giving affiliates the false security that NATS is out to prevent shaving, when in fact it has to some extent proven that NATS Sponsors have at least one method to shave (that doesn't involve a kickback to NATS).

                                                                                                  Not everything on GFY is as it appears...like several others, I find this method for communications by NATS highly suspicious.

                                                                                                  ADG Webmaster
                                                                                                  You didn't see a response from Naked Rhino because they won't respond until they figure out how to get out of this jam with their lawyers. NATS did the right thing here, and many are suprised it didn't come to the boards sooner. There was some high dollar theft going on. Re-read Son Of Jesus's posts again, he has more information than I do, and is DEAD on with his knowledge. XC isn't coming to the board because they have been trying to deflect this wrong doing for a few weeks now, and I imagine right now they are pretty much sitting at home, reading this exact thread, and shitting their pants trying to figure out what they did.

                                                                                                  XC is no small player, don't trust everything you see on Alexa, this time I can say with 100% confidence that it is not accurate.

                                                                                                  Once this all plays out, you can be sure that you will rethink your position on everything, NATS is 100% in the right here. If NATS had not figured this out and come forward you can be sure that XC would have continued to do what they are doing, and that is fucking affiliates out of rebills

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • Super Negro
                                                                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                                                                    • Aug 2006
                                                                                                    • 215

                                                                                                    #149
                                                                                                    Originally posted by Validus
                                                                                                    I agree, it doesn?t matter what happened, this has nothing to do on a public forum. I certainly wouldn?t be impressed of my software suppliers would pull something like this.
                                                                                                    So, software vendors shouldn't out cheaters in a public way? That is kind of fucked up and makes me think YOU are cheating and scared of getting caught

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    • studiocritic
                                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                                      • Jun 2005
                                                                                                      • 2442

                                                                                                      #150
                                                                                                      I'm disappointed that there are no updates from either side..
                                                                                                      254342256

                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                      Working...