So ccbill is coming with improvements, while paycom stand still?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • justsexxx
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Aug 2001
    • 13723

    #1

    So ccbill is coming with improvements, while paycom stand still?

    CCBILL has much better/detailed stats. Especially for affiliates...

    CCBILL made many improvements since last year...And now the Debit card addition etc...While paycom hasn't been improved since? well since when?

    Also paycom EU sucks for smaller paysite owners..Since paycom can not send checks to affiliates, when the program owner is using paycomeu...


    Agree or?
    Questions?

    ICQ: 125184542
  • chupachups
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2002
    • 6576

    #2
    Bump for a good thread

    Comment

    • RRRED
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2001
      • 6754

      #3
      Oh Andre, stop being a trouble maker

      Comment

      • scottybuzz
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • May 2006
        • 14799

        #4
        buimpppppp
        $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$

        Comment

        • BradShaw
          Confirmed User
          • Oct 2001
          • 7840

          #5
          They are out racing.
          Sig too big

          http://www.gofuckyourself.com/gfy_faqs.html

          Want to use a large banner in your sig??? Contact Eric about getting on as an advertiser - eric AT adult.com

          Comment

          • rowan
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Mar 2002
            • 17393

            #6
            I'd rather ccbill didn't make "improvements" to their affiliate stats, some of their more recent ones are quite bizarre.

            Comment

            • gleem
              Confirmed User
              • Jun 2001
              • 5593

              #7
              Originally posted by rowan
              I'd rather ccbill didn't make "improvements" to their affiliate stats, some of their more recent ones are quite bizarre.
              I agree, their improvements are a bitt nutty.

              you'd think a company that size could take a page from any other sponsor program out there and make easy to read, and usefull stats, let alone a decent easy to use interface.




              Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

              Comment

              • PR_Dave
                Confirmed User
                • Jul 2003
                • 2792

                #8
                I got a sneak peek at all the new Paycom stuff.

                Going to kick major ass, epsecially after they announce who they teamed up with for stats.

                Comment

                • KrisKross
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 5025

                  #9
                  I heard Paycom just struck a deal with MPA which involves a complete overhaul of their stats backend.

                  Comment

                  • crockett
                    in a van by the river
                    • May 2003
                    • 76818

                    #10
                    Originally posted by KrisKross
                    I heard Paycom just struck a deal with MPA which involves a complete overhaul of their stats backend.
                    great I wonder if it will come with the shav-O-matic option
                    In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                    Comment

                    • gleem
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jun 2001
                      • 5593

                      #11
                      Originally posted by crockett
                      great I wonder if it will come with the shav-O-matic option
                      hehe, can't wait till the MPA3 guys see that, maybe we can get another good NATS vs. MPA3 thread...




                      Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                      Comment

                      • justsexxx
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Aug 2001
                        • 13723

                        #12
                        Originally posted by KrisKross
                        I heard Paycom just struck a deal with MPA which involves a complete overhaul of their stats backend.
                        Interesting
                        Questions?

                        ICQ: 125184542

                        Comment

                        • Jace
                          FBOP Class Of 2013
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 35562

                          #13
                          isn't paycom/epoch merging their backend affiliate system with MPA?

                          that alone would beat ccbill to the ground in a heartbeat....ccbill has the ultimate worst backend for affiliates in the world...if you ever want to know what NOT to do with a program backend, just log into the ccbill affiliate system

                          hell, I send ccbill site owners traffic consistantly and only like half the hits even register in their backend

                          Comment

                          • Pimpin_J
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jul 2006
                            • 3637

                            #14
                            Smelling dead meat...

                            Comment

                            • David - PG
                              Confirmed User
                              • Mar 2004
                              • 767

                              #15
                              Originally posted by justsexxx
                              Also paycom EU sucks for smaller paysite owners..Since paycom can not send checks to affiliates, when the program owner is using paycomeu...
                              Maybe Paycom just understands that it's not the small revshare programs where the big bucks are made.
                              perfectgonzo.com

                              Comment

                              • andrej_NDC
                                Registered User
                                • May 2004
                                • 7760

                                #16
                                Originally posted by PR_Dave
                                I got a sneak peek at all the new Paycom stuff.
                                I wish it would be live already. I was told 6+ months ago that it won't take long anymore.

                                Comment

                                • Gambit
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Nov 2005
                                  • 571

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Jace
                                  isn't paycom/epoch merging their backend affiliate system with MPA?

                                  that alone would beat ccbill to the ground in a heartbeat....ccbill has the ultimate worst backend for affiliates in the world...if you ever want to know what NOT to do with a program backend, just log into the ccbill affiliate system

                                  hell, I send ccbill site owners traffic consistantly and only like half the hits even register in their backend
                                  I agree with you on most points - but at least you can see which of the members you sent are active - unlike in Nats
                                  Promote http://www.tiedvirgins.com for amazing bondage conversions. CCbill 50/50.

                                  Comment

                                  • justsexxx
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • Aug 2001
                                    • 13723

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by David - PG
                                    Maybe Paycom just understands that it's not the small revshare programs where the big bucks are made.

                                    I'm not speaking about my own program...But many good smaller niche sites do use ccbill....Also the check cutting is a big deal if you ask me...

                                    And ftvcash, met-art etc are also using ccbill only...I remember a thread where Shap mentioned the same thing btw(paycom not improving)...Searching for the thread now...

                                    But it looks like Paycom DOES improve...Looking forward to see their new stats backend
                                    Questions?

                                    ICQ: 125184542

                                    Comment

                                    • andrej_NDC
                                      Registered User
                                      • May 2004
                                      • 7760

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by David - PG
                                      Maybe Paycom just understands that it's not the small revshare programs where the big bucks are made.
                                      20 of such small programs at $50k monthly is $1000k. And I'm sure there are a lot more.

                                      Comment

                                      • NastyGodCash
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Oct 2005
                                        • 239

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by KrisKross
                                        I heard Paycom just struck a deal with MPA which involves a complete overhaul of their stats backend.
                                        it would be really great to got some better stats reports:-)
                                        http://www.nastygodcash.com - official sites of Silvia Saint, Evelyn Lory and Adriana Malkova

                                        Comment

                                        • justsexxx
                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                          • Aug 2001
                                          • 13723

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Gambit
                                          I agree with you on most points - but at least you can see which of the members you sent are active - unlike in Nats
                                          SO true!!! It's really a shame NATS doesn't offer this
                                          Questions?

                                          ICQ: 125184542

                                          Comment

                                          • gooddomains
                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                            • Jul 2003
                                            • 10127

                                            #22
                                            paycom go

                                            Comment

                                            • Roald
                                              SecretFriends.com
                                              • May 2001
                                              • 27910

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Jace
                                              isn't paycom/epoch merging their backend affiliate system with MPA?
                                              Yes they do, this will be a huge improvement imo


                                              WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME



                                              ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT


                                              Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | telegram: roaldr

                                              Comment

                                              • David - PG
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Mar 2004
                                                • 767

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by andrej_NDC
                                                20 of such small programs at $50k monthly is $1000k. And I'm sure there are a lot more.
                                                Yea, but who knows how much is enough to be worthwhile for guys like Paycom? Think about it from their perspective. They would have to put half a dozen programmers to work, review features, run neverending workshops, 50+ sweet-looking powerpoint charts to convince management, endless testing, bug reports. Then marketing, customer + webmaster feedback. The whole shebang.

                                                What do they get? Another 50 programs doing 50k monthly? Could well be such headache is not even worth an additional 2.5m in monthly revenues to them.

                                                Just a train of thoughts, pure speculation.
                                                perfectgonzo.com

                                                Comment

                                                • Crazy Carlos
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Jul 2006
                                                  • 699

                                                  #25
                                                  the only thing i wish for is a better backend at ccbill and if paycom offers that then we all know that ccbill will lose some clients. I think that the backend is very important and most billing companies out there except jettis, don't have a very good affiliate system. or i must have missed them.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • andrej_NDC
                                                    Registered User
                                                    • May 2004
                                                    • 7760

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by David - PG
                                                    Yea, but who knows how much is enough to be worthwhile for guys like Paycom? Think about it from their perspective. They would have to put half a dozen programmers to work, review features, run neverending workshops, 50+ sweet-looking powerpoint charts to convince management, endless testing, bug reports. Then marketing, customer + webmaster feedback. The whole shebang.

                                                    What do they get? Another 50 programs doing 50k monthly? Could well be such headache is not even worth an additional 2.5m in monthly revenues to them.

                                                    Just a train of thoughts, pure speculation.
                                                    Yeah, I know what you mean. And its also harder to find a motivation when things are running fine without much extra effort. But I was told paycom is working on improving their stats for some time now, so maybe they expect more small or middle sized clients.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • andrej_NDC
                                                      Registered User
                                                      • May 2004
                                                      • 7760

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by Crazy Carlos
                                                      then we all know that ccbill will lose some clients.
                                                      Then it will depend only on $$$. Who will make me/us more. But I don't think there are big differences between those two.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Manowar
                                                        jellyfish  
                                                        • Dec 2003
                                                        • 71528

                                                        #28
                                                        Hopefully CCBill's improvements will be great

                                                        Comment

                                                        Working...