Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
as well as 100% of the sites that are legal but have privacy laws like PIPEDA to worry about.
|
there are no such privacy laws saying ccbill must process for underage porn, sorry try again
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
If CCBILL added requirements that forced me to violate PIPEDA to get them to run billing thru them WHEN THE LAW DOES NOT REQUIRE THEM TOO i would sue them for everything i could.
|
nobody is suggesting they do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
there is a huge difference between doing something because the law requires you to (stopping Kiddie porn) and doing something the law does not require you to do (stopping who are legal because of the safe harbor provision)
|
wrong and wrong, firstly the 2 go hand in hand, without proof of ownership how can you possibly verify if any of the models are 18, you cant , so what you are saying is ignore child porn at the expense of dmca, and what i am saying is ethically and morally you should protect children as best you can. period end of story, what you are saying is its too costly for ccbill to hire one employee to curb child porn, sorry but many people disagree with you.
the 2 issues make it alot more fuzzy when put together , its much easier in mainstream where there arent issues with underage content.
You seem to be of the belief that its perfectly legal for me to sell copyright warner brothers movies until warner brother complains, not so.