Quote:
Originally Posted by Profits of Doom
So if you defend someone that has always done right by you, like DWB did, then you are an ass kisser? Funny, I don't see it that way. Like I said in another post I don't do business with Incredible Dollars or send them any traffic, but I find it tough to believe that NATS has yet to come in to refute them if that whole thing was bullshit. If there was fraud involved I find it hard to believe that NATS would let themselves take the heat if the error wasn't on their part. Then again, maybe I'm wrong, but at least I'm sensible enough to hear their side before pulling out my pitchfork...
|
There's a lot of "smoke" out there about I$ right now, people being billed for sites they never signed up for etc. etc. etc. A couple other companies have said they believe a company (that they won't name) has been doing "bad" things with people's CCs as well.. Then when you take into account this information
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...5/ai_n22399115 and particularly this part:
Quote:
|
The defendants also obtained the consumers' checking account numbers, the FTC said, and often withdrew additional funds from consumers' accounts without the express authorization required by the Telemarketing Sales Rule.
|
This "drama" has been going on for a couple weeks now with screen shots of revenue numbers and sales partners having been "leaked" etc. Someone is dirty... Just trying to figure out who it is. At this point, "blindly" supporting someone just because you've done some business with them and had a few beers with them is just ludicrous.