Seriously, i'm not trying to be a smartass, just wondering why?
imo, me posting a pic of my 7 year old son or daughter opening up Christmas gifts is quite a bit different than an underage (albeit only 6 days) girl showing cleavage telling us she's ready to get into the porn business.
Just suppose they let that go. Then someone posts someone a month underage. They let that go. Then someone posts 2 months underage.....
Where do they draw the line? The easiest place is at the age of 18.
Why the person would actually SAY she's underage is beyond me. Who'd have known the difference? (Not meant to give anyone any ideas. I'm just saying).
I hate to agree with you, but sadly... that thread was rather innocent.
This board... this industry, is made up of paranoid people who fear each other so much as to tip toe over everything they do for fear of what dirty perverted pornographers might think.
If you see a 16 or 17 year old in a bikini and you think that's wrong... you're the one thinking the bad thoughts. Not me.
Personally, I've met a lot of great people from GFY and have yet to meet one really freaky pedo pervert.. that I know of. I'd like to think that we here would be way more open to sexuality, beauty and the human body than most other places... we are supposed to be more open minded, right?
But no, we all think everyone else here is going to rape the girl in the picture if we post the picture on the dreaded GFY message board. That every time a person hits "submit".. they're the only person on GFY who wouldn't do something horrible to that girl, because after all... once they see the picture, they'll naturally have all kinds of access to that girl's home.
Heaven forbid the rest of us perverts ever see anything other than a completely nude skanky slut whore who does double anal, because an innocently clothed person who's under 18 would truly corrupt us and we certainly can't have that!
You're fucking kidding me. In six days, you'd happily show her on your sites, opening up all her orifices for the world to see, but now you still consider her a "kid"?
Closing the thread may have been a wise move legally speaking, but apart from that, it has no meaning whatsoever.
I hate to agree with you, but sadly... that thread was rather innocent.
This board... this industry, is made up of paranoid people who fear each other so much as to tip toe over everything they do for fear of what dirty perverted pornographers might think.
If you see a 16 or 17 year old in a bikini and you think that's wrong... you're the one thinking the bad thoughts. Not me.
Personally, I've met a lot of great people from GFY and have yet to meet one really freaky pedo pervert.. that I know of. I'd like to think that we here would be way more open to sexuality, beauty and the human body than most other places... we are supposed to be more open minded, right?
But no, we all think everyone else here is going to rape the girl in the picture if we post the picture on the dreaded GFY message board. That every time a person hits "submit".. they're the only person on GFY who wouldn't do something horrible to that girl, because after all... once they see the picture, they'll naturally have all kinds of access to that girl's home.
Heaven forbid the rest of us perverts ever see anything other than a completely nude skanky slut whore who does double anal, because an innocently clothed person who's under 18 would truly corrupt us and we certainly can't have that!
I don't think it's so much we're afraid of each other, as much as we're afraid of who's monitoring GFY.
If it was a cute 17 year old girl in a bikini, that's one thing. But an underage girl being blantantly provative and mentioning that she wants to get into the industry when she's legal is quite another. If anything it kind of reeks of entrapment.
Also, as Trixxxia points out, it is illegal to proposition someone under the legal age for adult modelling work.
I agree with the rest of your post though. It cracks me up to see the word pedo thrown around when the girl turns 18 tomorrow. That's not what a pedophile is.
I hate to agree with you, but sadly... that thread was rather innocent.
This board... this industry, is made up of paranoid people who fear each other so much as to tip toe over everything they do for fear of what dirty perverted pornographers might think.
If you see a 16 or 17 year old in a bikini and you think that's wrong... you're the one thinking the bad thoughts. Not me.
Personally, I've met a lot of great people from GFY and have yet to meet one really freaky pedo pervert.. that I know of. I'd like to think that we here would be way more open to sexuality, beauty and the human body than most other places... we are supposed to be more open minded, right?
But no, we all think everyone else here is going to rape the girl in the picture if we post the picture on the dreaded GFY message board. That every time a person hits "submit".. they're the only person on GFY who wouldn't do something horrible to that girl, because after all... once they see the picture, they'll naturally have all kinds of access to that girl's home.
Heaven forbid the rest of us perverts ever see anything other than a completely nude skanky slut whore who does double anal, because an innocently clothed person who's under 18 would truly corrupt us and we certainly can't have that!
sounds like you have issues and have justified the problem in your own mind
And for the record, Hooligan. You must have no common sense at all. Or are simply looking for a pointless arguement.
Best analogy I can think of is, it's the same reason why you don't point a gun at someone. Sure, it might not be loaded, and you don't have your finger on the trigger. But it's just smarter (common sense) to simply point it at a inanimate object.
If you can't tell the difference from GFY and a sears catalogue. Please don't go doing something stupid like breeding.
No I cant tell the difference. People post their kids here all the time. So what?
Why shouldn't 18- girls be allowed to do modeling?
This has been done offline for ages. Fashion shows, magazines, newspapers. Do you blame them for pedo catering too?? What's so different about the web as a medium that makes it NOT OK to do same thing?
How do you determine if its legal or not? The girl was fully clothed.
Hell, half the board members promote websites who feature NUDE underage models - under the pretense of "art". (metart, herge, etc)
I don't personally know anybody who do / did underage clothed girl sites.
Don't mix your friend/business network with every1 elses.
Originally posted by rayadp05
I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?
Comment