50...........
Syria Supports Lebanon Against the Barbaric Israelis
Collapse
X
-
Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager -
Originally posted by RS-MEDIAChina and India have THE most modern air force thanks to Russian Sukhoi that will smoke US airforce on any given day
okInvestor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
-
The proof is in the five wars Israel ( a nation with little land mass and a few million people) has won against many of the Mid Eastern countries, end of story. Yes the others are not.Originally posted by RS-MEDIAand others a not very well trained, trained and motivated... what ever dude... Nice argument... BT, says who? you?Comment
-
Combat systems
The Raptor?s air-to-air combat power is unmatched by any other fighter planned to be developed by 2020
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22_Raptor
Nuff said15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
Ithahaha8217;s not the guns, planes, ships, or weapons that win a war its intelligence and strategy which Israel has proven in the past that they excel in those two very important areas"Catch a man a fish, and you can sell it to him. Teach a man to fish, and you ruin a wonderful business opportunity."
Karl Marx
Affiliate Program Cash Beta v0.9

Comment
-
The US would easily control the skies against either force or both forces combined.Originally posted by RS-MEDIAChina and India have THE most modern air force thanks to Russian Sukhoi that will smoke US airforce on any given dayComment
-
So what you're saying is that Russia, in defiance of UN sanctions, re-supplied the Iraqis with their best equipment? Why then, were the Iraqis using T-55 tanks?Originally posted by Sexxxy SitesMuch of their Army and equipment was destroyed in the 1st Gulf War (during the six week air assault and 100 hour ground war), in addition Russia's finest was not as good as America's finest, also the Iraqi's did not have the will to fight, and were very poorly led..Comment
-
Originally posted by BadBoy_DaveBig deal?
A newer aircraft such as the Sukhoi should be better than the F-16
The F-16A first took flight in December 1976
How bout we compare newer the Sukhoi with F-22 or F-35?
You can compare the aircraft all you want. But when you get to the Pilots. there are no better in the world the the US Pilots. They, and the gound and sea soldiers fight because they WANT to.PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic
AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!Comment
-
What would be the point if they are inferior planes anyway? Think about how many paper planes you can bring one cruise boat to!Originally posted by BadBoy_DaveAnd also since America has the most Carriers, they get to use the most fighter planes, F-18, F-14.
And theres alot of them.Enjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
Iraq also had some of the top of the line Russian Tanks as well as top of the line Russian Artillery and French fighter jets, most of which were destroyed in the 1st Gulf war, expect in the case of the jets, which would not engage and the pilots flew them to Iran.Originally posted by RS-MEDIAyou shitting me? Iraq had 1970 equipment from Iran-Iraq war.. T-55 tanks.. who you kidding
Modern equipment... T-55. First introduced in 1949.Comment
-
Originally posted by pornguyYou can compare the aircraft all you want. But when you get to the Pilots. there are no better in the world the the US Pilots. They, and the gound and sea soldiers fight because they WANT to.
15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
Sounds like you have this "need" to claim stuff to make you feel more comfortable about something.Originally posted by Sexxxy SitesThe US would easily control the skies against either force or both forces combined.
Control what skies? There is a big world out there
XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Originally posted by RS-MEDIAWhat would be the point if they are inferior planes anyway? Think about how many paper planes you can bring one cruise boat to!
LOL, the F18 inferior?15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
And who made those armies next to second best? Iraq was using Russian T-55 that were introduced in 1949? Tough fight there if you ask me?Originally posted by Sexxxy SitesThe proof is in the five wars Israel ( a nation with little land mass and a few million people) has won against many of the Mid Eastern countries, end of story. Yes the others are not.Enjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
name me some of tothe "top line" please..Originally posted by Sexxxy SitesIraq also had some of the top of the line Russian Tanks as well as top of the line Russian Artillery and French fighter jets, most of which were destroyed in the 1st Gulf war, expect in the case of the jets, which would not engage and the pilots flew them to Iran.Enjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
It's not even the fighters themselves...Originally posted by pornguyYou can compare the aircraft all you want. But when you get to the Pilots. there are no better in the world the the US Pilots. They, and the gound and sea soldiers fight because they WANT to.
If you can't put the troops and aircraft where they need to be, why bother with the rest? The US has the best strategic position in the nothern hemisphere... where would any opposition force stage and/or launch offensive aircraft?
Mexico? Canada? Cuba?
Comment
-
Some months after the invasion of Iraq the Chinese Government and Military publically stated that the Chinese Military is no match for the US Military, but did also state that they would be working at changing that scenario.Originally posted by pussyserverchina has the "most feared" armyComment
-
Originally posted by brokeIt's not even the fighters themselves...
If you can't put the troops and aircraft where they need to be, why bother with the rest? The US has the best strategic position in the nothern hemisphere... where would any opposition force stage and/or launch offensive aircraft?
Mexico? Canada? Cuba?

Damn Canadians
15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sexxxy SitesSome months after the invasion of Iraq the Chinese Government and Military publically stated that the Chinese Military is no match for the US Military, but did also state that they would be working at changing that scenario.
Another.. of many statements, where there is this "need" to claim something.
Do you have an insecurity problem or is your patriotism disease just showing?XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
B-1's and B-2's do not need support, other than refueling.Originally posted by RS-MEDIABombers need support to drop those bombs... you know? otherwise they get shut down by fighter jets.Comment
-
eeeh, yes...Originally posted by BadBoy_DaveLOL, the F18 inferior?
to Rafale, Eurofighter, Su-30 and so on ... and I won't even talk about Su-37
how many times are planing on being my bitch in this topic?Enjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
can we see that quote.. So far you have been blowing smoke up my ass the entire time ?Originally posted by Sexxxy SitesSome months after the invasion of Iraq the Chinese Government and Military publically stated that the Chinese Military is no match for the US Military, but did also state that they would be working at changing that scenario.Enjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
LOL, did you read the thing that said F-22 would dominate the skies until 2020?Originally posted by RS-MEDIAeeeh, yes...
to Rafale, Eurofighter, Su-30 and so on ... and I won't even talk about Su-37
how many times are planing on being my bitch in this topic?15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
No, I have not stated any such thing. Not all of the top line equipment was destroyed in the 1st Gulf War, just most.Originally posted by WarChildSo what you're saying is that Russia, in defiance of UN sanctions, re-supplied the Iraqis with their best equipment? Why then, were the Iraqis using T-55 tanks?Comment
-
Originally posted by Sexxxy SitesB-1's and B-2's do not need support, other than refueling.
Please tell me you?re serious
Enjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
You are correct about the Pilots being the best, and that is because the US Military has the buget for them to constantly train and this applies to all aspects of the military. Other countries do not have the funds for this type of intense training.Originally posted by pornguyYou can compare the aircraft all you want. But when you get to the Pilots. there are no better in the world the the US Pilots. They, and the gound and sea soldiers fight because they WANT to.Comment
-
Lets try to get this into your headOriginally posted by RS-MEDIA
Please tell me you?re serious
The B-2's low observability is derived from a combination of reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures. These signatures make it difficult for the sophisticated defensive systems to detect, track and engage the B-2.
The B-2's low observability is derived from a combination of reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures. These signatures make it difficult for the sophisticated defensive systems to detect, track and engage the B-2.
The B-2's low observability is derived from a combination of reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures. These signatures make it difficult for the sophisticated defensive systems to detect, track and engage the B-2.
The B-2's low observability is derived from a combination of reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures. These signatures make it difficult for the sophisticated defensive systems to detect, track and engage the B-2.
The B-2's low observability is derived from a combination of reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures. These signatures make it difficult for the sophisticated defensive systems to detect, track and engage the B-2.15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
no, where?Originally posted by BadBoy_DaveLOL, did you read the thing that said F-22 would dominate the skies until 2020?Enjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
Right thurrOriginally posted by BadBoy_DaveCombat systems
The Raptor?s air-to-air combat power is unmatched by any other fighter planned to be developed by 2020
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22_Raptor
Nuff said15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
Right thurrOriginally posted by BadBoy_DaveCombat systems
The Raptor?s air-to-air combat power is unmatched by any other fighter planned to be developed by 2020
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22_Raptor
Nuff said15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
How did "Syria Supports Lebanon Against the Barbaric Israelis" become 'my country has the best fighters'???
Hopefully we're seeing a conflict where Israel will bomb Syria in an attempt to draw in Iran which leads to the bombing of Iranian nuke sites and sectarian war in the ME as a whole.
Happy birthday to me.Comment
-
Originally posted by pornguyYou can compare the aircraft all you want. But when you get to the Pilots. there are no better in the world the the US Pilots. They, and the gound and sea soldiers fight because they WANT to.
lol how so?
greeks and turkish pilots fight daily, when was the last time an avg american pilot was in similar position?Comment
-
And that?s why Yugos shut one down ??? Bwaaaaa..Originally posted by BadBoy_DaveLets try to get this into your head
The B-2's low observability is derived from a combination of reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures. These signatures make it difficult for the sophisticated defensive systems to detect, track and engage the B-2.
The B-2's low observability is derived from a combination of reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures. These signatures make it difficult for the sophisticated defensive systems to detect, track and engage the B-2.
The B-2's low observability is derived from a combination of reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures. These signatures make it difficult for the sophisticated defensive systems to detect, track and engage the B-2.
The B-2's low observability is derived from a combination of reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures. These signatures make it difficult for the sophisticated defensive systems to detect, track and engage the B-2.
The B-2's low observability is derived from a combination of reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures. These signatures make it difficult for the sophisticated defensive systems to detect, track and engage the B-2.
Let me try this again?
Here?s an article in ENGLISH that explains that detecting B-2 nowdays is not that difficult..
Do YO UNDERSTAND THE WORDS THAT COMING OUT OF MY MOUTH ????
http://www-tech.mit.edu/V121/N63/Stealth.63f.htmlEnjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
Yet another.. of many statements, where there is this "need" to claim something, even tho this has already been saidOriginally posted by Sexxxy SitesYou are correct about the Pilots being the best, and that is because the US Military has the buget for them to constantly train and this applies to all aspects of the military. Other countries do not have the funds for this type of intense training.
Man.. that insecurity problem or partriotism must be severe
How big is your dick BTW??
XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
I don't understand the words coming out of your mouth cuz your providing false facts..Originally posted by RS-MEDIAAnd that?s why Yugos shut one down ??? Bwaaaaa..
Let me try this again?
Here?s an article in ENGLISH that explains that detecting B-2 nowdays is not that difficult..
Do YO UNDERSTAND THE WORDS THAT COMING OUT OF MY MOUTH ????
http://www-tech.mit.edu/V121/N63/Stealth.63f.html
Stealth required years of research and massive computing power to develop. Defeating it was a similarly daunting task. F-117 Stealth Fighters flew over 1300 sorties in the Gulf War without a single one being shot down. A stealth airplane was not lost in combat until 1999, when Yugoslav forces in Kosovo shot one down. This feat was, however, not repeated.
Read carefully, they shot down an F-117 not a B-2
B-2's are much more technologically advanced and have never been shot down
15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
Originally posted by BadBoy_DaveRight thurr
U just toldme that F-18 were better...Enjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
Stop changing the subjectOriginally posted by RS-MEDIA
U just toldme that F-18 were better...
All I said was that F-14's are and F-18s are good planes and there are a lot of them due to all the carriers we have15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
The bottom line is this. There is not a military on the earth that can begin to compare with the US military, for many different reasons. The US military can project its forces anywhere in the world, and has foward positioned forces and supplies all around the world for this very purpose. No other country on the earth can project its military anywhere in the world and certainly no country on the earth has the ability to launch a land, or air invasion against the US. A few countries could hit us with ICBM's but I doubt that any care to committ suicide.Comment
-
What is the problem in Afghanistan and Iraq why can't they even manage to control that?Originally posted by Sexxxy SitesThe bottom line is this. There is not a military on the earth that can begin to compare with the US military, for many different reasons. The US military can project its forces anywhere in the world, and has foward positioned forces and supplies all around the world for this very purpose.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Which part of ?detecting B-2? technology did u not understand and I need to highlight for you???/Originally posted by BadBoy_DaveI don't understand the words coming out of your mouth cuz your providing false facts..
Stealth required years of research and massive computing power to develop. Defeating it was a similarly daunting task. F-117 Stealth Fighters flew over 1300 sorties in the Gulf War without a single one being shot down. A stealth airplane was not lost in combat until 1999, when Yugoslav forces in Kosovo shot one down. This feat was, however, not repeated.
Read carefully, they shot down an F-117 not a B-2
B-2's are much more technologically advanced and have never been shot down
Enjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
Guerilla WarfareOriginally posted by WebbyWhat is the problem in Afghanistan and Iraq why can't they even manage to control that?
Basically impossible to win in a country like Afghanistan and Iraq
It's stupid that America's continuing the fight15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
Good is not enough in combat. Iraq had good 1970?s tanks (BTW weren?t you going to tell me which were modern technology??) .. but it wasn?t enoughOriginally posted by BadBoy_DaveStop changing the subject
All I said was that F-14's are and F-18s are good planes and there are a lot of them due to all the carriers we haveEnjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
How long will it take for these ?best? to say ?Mission accomplished? in Afghanistan, iraq? Oh wait, they already did? so why are they still there???Originally posted by Sexxxy SitesThe bottom line is this. There is not a military on the earth that can begin to compare with the US military, for many different reasons. The US military can project its forces anywhere in the world, and has foward positioned forces and supplies all around the world for this very purpose. No other country on the earth can project its military anywhere in the world and certainly no country on the earth has the ability to launch a land, or air invasion against the US. A few countries could hit us with ICBM's but I doubt that any care to committ suicide.Enjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
How rhetoric? british, soviets and now you step in the same pile of shit thinking you can do better?Originally posted by BadBoy_DaveGuerilla Warfare
Basically impossible to win in a country like Afghanistan and Iraq
It's stupid that America's continuing the fight
Enjoy Bucks - Enjoy Bucks
Comment
-
Ya, I agree with you that you can detect it, but very hard to do it, it even said that it's not that easy, especially with the B-2 flying at extremely high altitudes where most fighters cant reachOriginally posted by RS-MEDIAWhich part of ?detecting B-2? technology did u not understand and I need to highlight for you???/
15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
Man.. Could not agree more!Originally posted by BadBoy_DaveGuerilla Warfare
Basically impossible to win in a country like Afghanistan and Iraq
It's stupid that America's continuing the fight
It does not matter what weaponary or what country - there is no comparison when stuffing conventional forces up against guerilla fighters.
Russia had the same problem and persisted for a good few years - then gave up and went home.
Odds on, the same thing will happen in the current conflict. Even on lower level guerilla activity - conventional weaponary does not get very far.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Originally posted by RS-MEDIAHow rhetoric? british, soviets and now you step in the same pile of shit thinking you can do better?

Huh?
15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios!$25 PPS | 50% Revshare | 5% Webmaster Referral
David K. | Account Manager | www.ProducerCash.com
ICQ: 480757149 | david AT producercash DOT com
TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112
Comment
-
That is like asking why the 50,000 man police force in New York City cannot stop crime from happening. We have something more than a hundred thousand troops in a country with the land mass of Texas and 27 million people. The military and government were defeated in a walk through.Originally posted by WebbyWhat is the problem in Afghanistan and Iraq why can't they even manage to control that?
In answer to your question we do not have enough boots on the ground. Talk to Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld about that.Comment

Comment