Okey doke. A rare thing from me: Business thread. R.e. 2257 - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

jimthefiend

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 18889
Share

Post
#1

Okey doke. A rare thing from me: Business thread. R.e. 2257

07-08-2006, 12:23 PM

Just a couple of points I'd like to make that I WANTED to on Ynot the other day, but couldnt for longer than 4 minutes because apparently the listeners were more interested in how big a douche I think Ramos is.

Anyway...

Last years drama relating to the modifications to the 2257 statute has always been a mystery to me.

Why?

Well shut the fuck up for a second and I'll tell you.

I simply do not understand why you all got your proverbial panties in a bunch when that law became more restrictive, when the ORIGINAL law itself is unconstitutional.

The Bill Of Rights, for you commie third worlders, consists of the first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

Amendment ONE

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Read that, read it again, print it out, read it one more time, then explain to me why you arent all protesting in front of the Supreme Court right now.

Just a little thought...
Tags: None
jimthefiend

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 18889
Share

Post
#2

07-08-2006, 12:24 PM

PS: The original 1990 statute was passed under the Clinton administration, and by a Democratically controlled Congress.
Comment
riddler

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 3726
Share

Post
#3

07-08-2006, 12:25 PM

got a mp3 link of you on ynot radio?
Comment
jimthefiend

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 18889
Share

Post
#4

07-08-2006, 12:25 PM

PSS: Tipper Gore sucks negro cock in the back of limos up in the NE quarter of D.C., but that isn't relevant to this discussion.
Comment
riddler

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 3726
Share

Post
#5

07-08-2006, 12:29 PM

nm found it.
Comment
L-Pink

working on my tan

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 39151
Share

Post
#6

07-08-2006, 12:34 PM

Originally posted by jimthefiend

PSS: Tipper Gore sucks negro cock in the back of limos up in the NE quarter of D.C., but that isn't relevant to this discussion.

Ever watch Ted Nugent and her on c-span?
Comment
marketsmart

HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER

Join Date: Dec 2004

Posts: 20419
Share

Post
#7

07-08-2006, 12:36 PM

well apparently you dont get television, newspapers, or any type of news media in your neck of the woods. the govt has been violating your constitutional rights for quite some time now and no one is doing shit about it....
Comment
jimthefiend

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 18889
Share

Post
#8

07-08-2006, 12:37 PM

Originally posted by L-Pink

Ever watch Ted Nugent and her on c-span?

LOL no. I would kiss Boy Alley to see that though.
Comment
marketsmart

HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER

Join Date: Dec 2004

Posts: 20419
Share

Post
#9

07-08-2006, 12:38 PM

btw... i think people are more afraid of being the govts first test case on the constitutionality of the new 2257 than of the actual law itself....
Comment
jimthefiend

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 18889
Share

Post
#10

07-08-2006, 12:43 PM

Originally posted by marketsmart

btw... i think people are more afraid of being the govts first test case on the constitutionality of the new 2257 than of the actual law itself....

The government would lose, even with the Supreme Court we have now. Even Clintoon said that he would not encourage it to be enforced by people in his administration.

THAT statement is pretty important, when you think about the fact that his adminstration included the attorney general.
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#11

07-08-2006, 12:52 PM

Originally posted by jimthefiend

Amendment ONE

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

OK.. Just out of curiosity - is there any condition/law/ruling where the above does not apply in relation to the adult biz?

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment
jimthefiend

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 18889
Share

Post
#12

07-08-2006, 12:57 PM

Originally posted by Webby

OK.. Just out of curiosity - is there any condition/law/ruling where the above does not apply in relation to the adult biz?

It doesnt matter if there is.

Any law passed or statute enacted would still have to pass through a litmus test of constitutionality now wouldn't it?
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#13

07-08-2006, 12:59 PM

Originally posted by marketsmart

btw... i think people are more afraid of being the govts first test case on the constitutionality of the new 2257 than of the actual law itself....

May be marketsmart, but despite that - it's a very badly drafted law in the first place (least the ammendment is).

Forgetting being in the adult biz and dumping any biase re this - overall, got to say it is like serveral other laws, or proposed laws lately, which have nothing to do with the proclaimed intent, but are simply manipluative and clearly based on a political agenda.

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment
marketsmart

HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER

Join Date: Dec 2004

Posts: 20419
Share

Post
#14

07-08-2006, 12:59 PM

Originally posted by jimthefiend

The government would lose, even with the Supreme Court we have now. Even Clintoon said that he would not encourage it to be enforced by people in his administration.

THAT statement is pretty important, when you think about the fact that his adminstration included the attorney general.

for once, i agree with you... but can you think of anyone that would volunteer to fight the battle.... you are talking about a major financial commitment to go to that level.. also, dont you think the govt would attack you from other directions like the irs, etc... even if you were super clean, they would still fuck with you every chance they got...
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#15

07-08-2006, 01:00 PM

Originally posted by jimthefiend

It doesnt matter if there is.

Any law passed or statute enacted would still have to pass through a litmus test of constitutionality now wouldn't it?

Sure Jim... was just asking if anyone knew of instances where this has already happened under Ammendment One.

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment
marketsmart

HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER

Join Date: Dec 2004

Posts: 20419
Share

Post
#16

07-08-2006, 01:02 PM

Originally posted by Webby

May be marketsmart, but despite that - it's a very badly drafted law in the first place (least the ammendment is).

Forgetting being in the adult biz and dumping any biase re this - overall, got to say it is like serveral other laws, or proposed laws lately, which have nothing to do with the proclaimed intent, but are simply manipluative and clearly based on a political agenda.

agreed 100%... we all know that the new 2257 does little or nothing to curb child exploitation and that was the govt's case for the revised law...

of course its another political ploy to give the impression that the govt actually cares about the people it represents...
Comment
Violetta

Affiliate

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 28735
Share

Post
#17

07-08-2006, 01:13 PM

Originally posted by jimthefiend

Why?

Well shut the fuck up for a second and I'll tell you.

M&A Queen
Comment
germ

( o Y o )

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 3108
Share

Post
#18

07-08-2006, 01:17 PM

Originally posted by jimthefiend

PS: The original 1990 statute was passed under the Clinton administration, and by a Democratically controlled Congress.

that is SO relevant. </sarcasm>

i thought this was a business thread, not a political one.
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#19

07-08-2006, 01:19 PM

Originally posted by Webby

OK.. Just out of curiosity - is there any condition/law/ruling where the above does not apply in relation to the adult biz?

OK. Dammit

I'll answer my own post - we should all know this one before much else

Obscenity is an instance where Ammendment One does not apply.

Meanwhile.. back to the thread topic...

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment
gimo33

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 5599
Share

Post
#20

07-08-2006, 01:21 PM

where is the real jimthefiend?....

Galleries that sells www.highendcreatives.com Avail of the $10 per gallery, promo!! Highend Designs at Low Price. Contact us now!
Comment
scottybuzz

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 14799
Share

Post
#21

07-08-2006, 01:32 PM

up his own ass

$$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$
Comment
MikeSmoke

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 3241
Share

Post
#22

07-08-2006, 05:08 PM

Originally posted by jimthefiend

Read that, read it again, print it out, read it one more time, then explain to me why you arent all protesting in front of the Supreme Court right now.

Then what are you doing here posting all day, instead of protesting in front of the Supreme Court?

icq: 541-739-92
Comment
jimthefiend

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 18889
Share

Post
#23

07-09-2006, 02:48 AM

Originally posted by MikeSmoke

Then what are you doing here posting all day, instead of protesting in front of the Supreme Court?

Theres no money in it.
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...