Because they like getting 999 different checks.
Or they enjoy logging into 9999 different sites to check stats and get link codes.
Or they don't realize that most nats program use ccbill as a primary processor and stupidly think that nats is getting them more signups.
On second thought those might be reasons people don't like nats...
Because they like getting 999 different checks.
Or they enjoy logging into 9999 different sites to check stats and get link codes.
Or they don't realize that most nats program use ccbill as a primary processor and stupidly think that nats is getting them more signups.
On second thought those might be reasons people don't like nats...
And what about the sponsors that don't work with ccbill ?
Personally I think people make too much of what affiliate system a program is using and not looking at other factors that make a sponsor convert great or miserably.
Nats, MPA3, CCBill, to me it doesn't matter which is used, what matters is how much money I'm making with a sponsor. Right now my best sponsor by far is a ccbill sponsors, next month it might be an MPA3 sponsor or a Nats sponsors. It has little to do with the affiliate system and promoting a sponsor just because of the system they're using is just nuts.
To me it seems as if NATS is more preferred and I really like to know why.
It's preffered to mpa3 becasue of the attitude the MPA guys have toward the shave feature they had in version 2. They never apoligized to webmasters and always acted like they did the right thing. This is waht bothers people.
It's been established that the product is good.
Originally posted by rayadp05
I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?
Doesn't NATS has some sort of extra level of fraud protection, or was that an add-on I saw one sponsor use?
If so, that could be a reason why some people see ratios drop when going to NATS. I like the fraud protection, but from what I hear it's a little overboard at times. For example, I was told you don't get credit for a sale until someone actually logs into the site. Also, if sell two sites from the same program to the same user, you don't get credit for one because they consider it fraud when a user signs up for a program 2x.
I'm not sure all the above info is correct, but I really would like some confirmation on it. I'm less and less impressed with NATS every time I try a sponsor that uses it.
Doesn't NATS has some sort of extra level of fraud protection, or was that an add-on I saw one sponsor use?
If so, that could be a reason why some people see ratios drop when going to NATS. I like the fraud protection, but from what I hear it's a little overboard at times. For example, I was told you don't get credit for a sale until someone actually logs into the site. Also, if sell two sites from the same program to the same user, you don't get credit for one because they consider it fraud when a user signs up for a program 2x.
I'm not sure all the above info is correct, but I really would like some confirmation on it. I'm less and less impressed with NATS every time I try a sponsor that uses it.
That is a very wise thing to do regardless of any affiliate software used.
It is like asking why do you like Quickbooks for handling your money... Because you set it up, you then do your work... It does its job, you do your job. You don't have to do its job. It helps you with yours though and doesn't bitch about the extra work.
i can track with other systems too, i really dont understand what the fuss is all about with NATS... but yea its fairly quick to use.
That is why I started this thread, to find out what's the fuss is all about and why affiliates might prefer NATS and it seems as if there are actually some reasons for it.
It is like asking why do you like Quickbooks for handling your money... Because you set it up, you then do your work... It does its job, you do your job. You don't have to do its job. It helps you with yours though and doesn't bitch about the extra work.
It's preffered to mpa3 becasue of the attitude the MPA guys have toward the shave feature they had in version 2. They never apoligized to webmasters and always acted like they did the right thing. This is waht bothers people.
It's been established that the product is good.
That's a valid reason of course, although it has nothing to do with one system being better than the other. It would have been wise to not implement that feature at all.
Personally I think people make too much of what affiliate system a program is using and not looking at other factors that make a sponsor convert great or miserably.
Nats, MPA3, CCBill, to me it doesn't matter which is used, what matters is how much money I'm making with a sponsor. Right now my best sponsor by far is a ccbill sponsors, next month it might be an MPA3 sponsor or a Nats sponsors. It has little to do with the affiliate system and promoting a sponsor just because of the system they're using is just nuts.
But from the thread titles on GFY recently you can see that people are actively looking for NATS based programs, there must be some reason for this.
Comment