Originally Posted by sltr

can anyone really explain tort law?
LOL!

i can't really speak to the legalities of those cases, however, i did help put my ex-wife through law school and her 1st few years practicing and i recall her frustations when trying to make sense of torts, and our many conversations about them.

it seems to me you are posting those cases to show that the federal reserve bank is privately owned, correct? if so, i think the issue is a complicated one and that's why the courts decided that the bank is not a government institution and therefor, not liable to damages or tort to the plaintiffs in those cases.

but again, i am not an attorney and it's hard to make heads or tails outta that shit, hahahahahah!

but even so, privately owned does not mean foreign owned and conspiratorial.

also, re: the original topic of this thread, i am in complete agreement with ron paul and with your conclusion that we are fucked.

doh.