Wonder if there's a historical direct relation to the US spending on military and the terrorist acts against it.
Also, wonder what the country would be like if all that military spending was used when spent on the actual country (healthcare, education, local impoverished).
Hilarious how much the US spend when it could go into something more useful like healthcare and education...
The ole guns and butter argument. It is necessary for the US to spend the large $ because so many other countries aren't. Let's take the Aussies for example. You're flying good ole US F-18s and F-15s. Development paid for by the US and not Australia.
That's just an example. Maybe 12clicks or KRL will hit the thread and throw out some more stats.
yea, I was going to make that point. If the US didn't spend money on the military, there would likely only be 3 or maybe 4 different countries on that chart to compare. Unless you divide it up and show spending for "country that used to be known as France", or however you would say that in German.
I imagine that person that started this thread either is pro comunism or hasn't studied a fellow by the name of Ronald Reagan. My tax dollars changed the world for many people. Your welcome.
The ole guns and butter argument. It is necessary for the US to spend the large $ because so many other countries aren't. Let's take the Aussies for example. You're flying good ole US F-18s and F-15s. Development paid for by the US and not Australia.
That's just an example. Maybe 12clicks or KRL will hit the thread and throw out some more stats.
That don't stand up either pussyluver.
Other countries buy and pay for that military technology - with an inbuilt price for development. It's not exactly given away for free.
The only two actual areas where trade surpluses do exist in the US is in the area of arms and wheat. Arms manufacture provides both employment in the US and a major source of external revenue.
In fact... the US exports more arms to the rest of the world than all other nations combined.
True.. But the government is currupt in many ways..
and? you think billions are lining the pockets the rich? think again... do you have any idea how much it cost to feed, clothe, house a standing army as large as ours? and thats besides all the other parts of the military, including civilians who work in it. gotta love posts from people who-
a- aren't from the usa and want to pass judgement
b- have no clue about the military industry we have
Other countries buy and pay for that military technology - with an inbuilt price for development. It's not exactly given away for free.
The only two actual areas where trade surpluses do exist in the US is in the area of arms and wheat. Arms manufacture provides both employment in the US and a major source of external revenue.
In fact... the US exports more arms to the rest of the world than all other nations combined.
That said, the cost of developing and maintaining the worlds super power costs the US taxpayer. Just because there is a surplus in exports really doesn't prove anything. You expect me to swallow that all the exports of military hardware were a net gain for the US? Give me a break.
There are all those loans for shipped goods that are never paid. At least the stock holders got their money there.
Who would step in and protect a countrry from invasion from China, Iran or North Korea? Are the Assuies, Brits or Japanese prepared to totally defend themselves? Let's throw in a number of other countries such as Canada, Mexico, Czech Republic, France and so on. Point is, The US is the brick wall the real bad guys have to face.
I imagine that person that started this thread either is pro comunism or hasn't studied a fellow by the name of Ronald Reagan. My tax dollars changed the world for many people. Your welcome.
Hilarious how much the US spend when it could go into something more useful like healthcare and education...
BTW dunefield... tho the legend on that graph is headed "Military Spending", it's not clear whether this is actual military spending or deviant costs built in to cover the manufacture of weaponary which is subsequently sold to other nations.
Weapons manufacture, development and arms trading is an entirely different biz and a massive profit center.
Tho either way, it's still going to be totally absurd considering other unattended to and more relevant priorities.
Who would step in and protect a countrry from invasion from China, Iran or North Korea? Are the Assuies, Brits or Japanese prepared to totally defend themselves? Let's throw in a number of other countries such as Canada, Mexico, Czech Republic, France and so on.
I must of miss the news report on Fox ... I heard China was invading, but economically. I heard Mexico was invading, but with low wage illegal workers ...
Must be awfull to live in fear of invasion ...
Originally posted by pussyluver
Point is, The US is the brick wall the real bad guys have to face.
Different perspective ....
Last edited by directfiesta; 06-21-2006, 06:03 PM.
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
I must of miss the news report on Fox ... I heard China was invading, but economically. I heard Mexico was invading, but with low wage illegal workers ...
Must be awfull to live in fear of invasion ...
Different perspective ....
There are 1.3 Billion people in China with a growing thirst for resources. There's is a different society. If it wasn't for the might of the US, they would be more proactive in gaining assets. Taiwan for example. The US adds balance.
Also, wonder what the country would be like if all that military spending was used when spent on the actual country (healthcare, education, local impoverished).
Better yet, lets not spend it all, or for that matter take it from the people.
shit, like i said before, that pays people's salaries..
would you rather they spend none and have poverty kick in big time for those pople?
It may be a better clue to invest in manufacturing ability and work towards paying off the daily loans by other nations and moving towards having any trade surplus than being known as the world's biggest arms trader.
Living off the "national credit card" is not sustainable.
Something else to think about. Right now the North Koreans have a missile on a launch pad that will be a test, deliver a warhead someplace or put a satellite in space. The US has satellites watching the site, ships at sea monitoring communications etc. All that cost $$$. What other nations have the ability to provide the world of key information such as launch and where the damn thing is headed. Who else even has a chance at shooting it down?
If it hits Japan, would that country have the ability to go to war with N. Korea? We limited their military mission at the the end of WWII....
Oh, I know!!! CNN will cover the launch if it happens.
go figure....the worlds only "super power" spends more than any other nation to fund the most tecnologic millitary forces on the planet.....
So you are saying that China is NOT a super power or that N. Korea, Iran and other nations aren't dangerous or headed by some lunatic. Seems to me Russia has the ability to be a supper power again. Iran armed with nuclear weapons makes them as dangerous.
What happens when terrorist attacks start happening in the Netherlands cause China doesn't approve of your morals?
So you are saying that China is NOT a super power or that N. Korea, Iran and other nations aren't dangerous or headed by some lunatic. Seems to me Russia has the ability to be a supper power again. Iran armed with nuclear weapons makes them as dangerous.
What happens when terrorist attacks start happening in the Netherlands cause China doesn't approve of your morals?
Why you fear so much pl? Terrorism is nothing new and will still exist centuries after we have all gone.
I never heard North Korea, Iran or China had any plans to launch attacks specifically on the US (or the Netherlands over moral issues) - did you?
China spends about $62 billion annually for military purposes (not far off the UK and Russia). It may take a little more to engage in mass warfare with the rest of the world. This still leaves the US spending around $420 billion in fear some other nation tops em at something.
It's hardly sane for any nation who have only around 4%+ of the worlds population but spend 43% of the world total spending on military costs.
To maintain this unreality, the US borrows around $10billion daily from other nations - and where $2-$4billion is being financed by that arch evil nation - the Central Bank of China. Something is amiss somewhere?
Comment