Fact checking Sarah Palin's Speech

Well it seemed to me they liked slamming obama more than McCain so I fired up old google and found this:

We are a nonpartisan, nonprofit, "consumer advocate" for voters
that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S.
politics. We monitor the factual accuracy of what is said by major
U.S. political players in the form of TV ads, debates, speeches,
interviews, and news releases. Our goal is to apply the best practices
of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge
and understanding.

The APPC was established by publisher and philanthropist Walter
Annenberg in 1994 to create a community of scholars within the
University of Pennsylvania that would address public policy issues at
the local, state, and federal levels.
The APPC accepts NO funding from business corporations, labor unions,
political parties, lobbying organizations or individuals. It is funded
primarily by the Annenberg Foundation.

It sounds nice enough, but the problem is it's funding couldn't come
from a more partisan source. Despite a lengthy list of political
donations, Leonore Annenberg, the Trustee of the foundation, and the
late Walter Annenberg have never made a donation do a democratic
candidate. Not ever. Here's the list of donations: (You can search for
yourself here)

[...]

Please feel free to advise those media outlets that refer to this
group as non-partisan that they are funded by a foundation created by
a man that gave $5000 to the California Republican Party in 2000. Now
the foundation which funds this non-partisan organization is run by
his Leonore Annenberg, who is worth $2 billion - but she can't spare a
Democrat a dime.

I find it funny they had the going over of obama's speech line by line the next day but for Sarah there is silence so far.

Before going on...

Could it be, perhaps, that your own love for Obama clouds your objective judgement?

In another thread, you said you'd take a bullet for the guy. Since that's the kind of thing people usually only feel about family members, it makes me question your objectivity in this particular case.

To me, you seem similar to a loving parent who can't find a single flaw in his child.



Ad hominem.

If you want to criticize the project, criticize it on its merits. Find flaws in the articles, numbers on articles critical of each candidate, etc.

like the right doesnt do this? please stop. Actually my friend you should be afraid of what happens if they win. News Flash you produce porn. Go look up porn under the reagan and nixon years.

Before going on...

Could it be, perhaps, that your own love for Obama clouds your objective judgement?

In another thread, you said you'd take a bullet for the guy. Since that's the kind of thing people usually only feel about family members, it makes me question your objectivity in this particular case.

To me, you seem similar to a loving parent who can't find a single flaw in his child.



Ad hominem.

If you want to criticize the project, criticize it on its merits. Find flaws in the articles, numbers on articles critical of each candidate, etc.

i think you'll find checking facts is pretty important no matter what party you support. I have a site for sale that gets 50 billion uniques a minute, want to buy it...no need to check the facts though right?

Im at a coffee shop when I get home I will do a article count,if Im wrong I have no problem saying so.
I know obama isnt pure he is a fucking politician and like all of them.you have to sell your soul to get anywhere. Ive been very unhappy with how ball less the democrats have been.
That being said still think he is a better choice for the country.
Also in my home state Im voting for a republican if he decides to run for gov.

Tony the reason he doesnt care is because he makes less than a mcdonalds manager with his program. That is the only reason he can push for mccain and Palin so hard. He has no brains which again is obvious by what he is in this industry. nothing.

Nice speech. Is this her own?