Anyone on here using the "Digichat" software for one of their sites?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Centurion
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2002
    • 6033

    #1

    Anyone on here using the "Digichat" software for one of their sites?

    Curious as to how well this software works in realtime, since the company really doesn't offer any info on any sites currently using it. And they definitely want some BIG bucks for their top of the line package.

    AND..if anyone can suggest an audio/video chat program that works better than digichat does, would love to hear which one that would be.
  • $5 submissions
    I help you SUCCEED
    • Nov 2003
    • 32189

    #2
    Bump for centurion

    Comment

    • flashbang
      Confirmed User
      • May 2006
      • 767

      #3
      I almost want to make one at those insane prices



      Your TGP traffic belongs to you again
      |
      X Rated Words & Hard Links

      Comment

      • Centurion
        Confirmed User
        • Dec 2002
        • 6033

        #4
        Originally posted by flashbang
        I almost want to make one at those insane prices

        Price is insane..that's why I'm curious as to who is using the program.

        Comment

        • RazorSharpe
          Confirmed User
          • Aug 2001
          • 2238

          #5
          I am using it and I would suggest you not buy it. I paid them over $4K for some custom modifications to the a/v part of the system in February last year and it was meant to take a month to develop. Mind you, this was $4K over and above the price of the application. They gave me a buggy, non-working end product and to date are still giving me the run around on fixing it.

          Do business with them at your own risk.

          ...
          Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.

          Comment

          • fallenmuffin
            Confirmed User
            • Nov 2005
            • 8170

            #6
            I thought about using digichat as an old client of mine uses it for his chat website but its resource and bandwidth heavy. *be advised* If I was going to run some full on chat site then it might be a worthwild investment. However for the time being a free copy of parachat works pretty good. Their paid copy is pretty cheap at 4.95/mo and another one at 17.95/mo (which can do banners ect ect)

            Digichat does have some cool features though and their latest version does webcams I believe.

            Comment

            • Probono
              Confirmed User
              • Oct 2002
              • 2731

              #7
              We used them for years when the product was Java based. When they went to Flash they made us pay for new software despite a fully paid service agreement. We were never able to make the flash software work, they never bothered to tell us we needed a flash server until after they took our money. I would stay away from those people.

              Comment

              • Centurion
                Confirmed User
                • Dec 2002
                • 6033

                #8
                Originally posted by RazorSharpe
                I am using it and I would suggest you not buy it. I paid them over $4K for some custom modifications to the a/v part of the system in February last year and it was meant to take a month to develop. Mind you, this was $4K over and above the price of the application. They gave me a buggy, non-working end product and to date are still giving me the run around on fixing it.

                Do business with them at your own risk.

                ...

                Thank you so much for that information. That is why GFY can prove invaluable at times! Sorry to hear that you are going through all that crap. But do appreciate you sharing your experience with the program.

                Comment

                • Centurion
                  Confirmed User
                  • Dec 2002
                  • 6033

                  #9
                  Originally posted by fallenmuffin
                  I thought about using digichat as an old client of mine uses it for his chat website but its resource and bandwidth heavy. *be advised* If I was going to run some full on chat site then it might be a worthwild investment. However for the time being a free copy of parachat works pretty good. Their paid copy is pretty cheap at 4.95/mo and another one at 17.95/mo (which can do banners ect ect)

                  Digichat does have some cool features though and their latest version does webcams I believe.
                  I'm wanting a program that has BOTH audio & video in it..and those are far and few between. That's why I was looking at digichat.

                  Comment

                  • Centurion
                    Confirmed User
                    • Dec 2002
                    • 6033

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Probono
                    We used them for years when the product was Java based. When they went to Flash they made us pay for new software despite a fully paid service agreement. We were never able to make the flash software work, they never bothered to tell us we needed a flash server until after they took our money. I would stay away from those people.

                    Again thanks for the input. Much appreciated!

                    Comment

                    • V_RocKs
                      Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 32451

                      #11
                      Nope. But it looks interesting, thanks for the heads up.

                      Comment

                      • RazorSharpe
                        Confirmed User
                        • Aug 2001
                        • 2238

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Centurion
                        Thank you so much for that information. That is why GFY can prove invaluable at times! Sorry to hear that you are going through all that crap. But do appreciate you sharing your experience with the program.

                        No worries; it would be inconsiderate of me to not warn you especially given my experiences with them.

                        http://www.camdatepro.com/ - I used this software before digichat and the ONLY reason I went with digichat was because they promised me they could provide me a many to many environment. The camdatepro guys were honest and told me it would take them too much time and I was on a tight schedule. Camdate is a very good chat application for what it cost me and unlike digichat, it is not java based.

                        ...
                        Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.

                        Comment

                        • RazorSharpe
                          Confirmed User
                          • Aug 2001
                          • 2238

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Probono
                          We used them for years when the product was Java based. When they went to Flash they made us pay for new software despite a fully paid service agreement. We were never able to make the flash software work, they never bothered to tell us we needed a flash server until after they took our money. I would stay away from those people.
                          Hey Probono, this may sound cruel, but I'm glad I'm not the only one who has experienced issues with these dweebs.

                          ...
                          Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.

                          Comment

                          Working...