|
so much misinformation in this thread it fucking hurts my brain. Kudos to pornopat who seems to be the only one that has some clue about SEO. AdvertisingSex is as clueless is they get.
Any link to you gives you a positive vote (if you want to use positive or negative). There is no such thing as negative link. What kind of brainless bullshit is that?
Adobe.com ranks as #1 result for "Click Here" - yet phrase "Click Here" doesn't even appear on that page at all. So how can a page that doesn't have certain text rank for that phrase as #1 result out of 1.6 billion (yes, billion, it's not a typo). It's because anchor text is this powerful and it does affect your SERP for the phrase in anchor.
Conclusion:
If your page is about Texas and you get hundreds of pages linking to you with anchor text "Oklahoma", your ranking for Texas does not get affected negatively (it will be somewhat affected positively because of increased PR as result of incoming links), but you will also rank high for "Oklahoma" even though the page has nothing to do with Oklahoma.
Conclusion #2:
AdvertisingSex is the most clueless fag who has no business telling anyone about SEO.
Kichi is second most clueless fag when it comes to SEO
|