View Single Post
Old 08-30-2008, 09:27 AM  
Libertine
sex dwarf
 
Libertine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 17,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog View Post
Why shouldn't they be taught the theory?

That is one thing I noticed as being a parent. It seems like education in schools is like a logic register. You can only hold so many bits, so as new bits come in, the old ones drop out.

There are so many topics that are just not taught any more. As time goes on people only teach recent events and theories and anything that happened in the past just kind of drops to the wayside as not being important.
"Teach the controversy" is the slogan of several organizations promoting creationism. The idea is to promote the thought that creationism is an equal alternative to evolution, that in the scientific community, there actually is a controversy.

But there isn't. There are virtually no scientists working in relevant fields who support creationism or intelligent design.

Teaching creationism in biology class creates the false impression that it's a scientifically relevant theory. It means spending inordinate amounts of time on something that has long passed the stage of being credible as a scientific theory.

Of course, there's nothing wrong with teaching it in history class, along with the flat earth theory, phlogiston and geocentrism. But that's not what the creationists want. They want it to be taught as a valid alternative to evolution - which it isn't.
__________________
/(bb|[^b]{2})/
Libertine is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote