Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog
You're right, they should have tazed him. You and I obviously have different definitions of serious injury.
|
lol, you're right too. To me, a serious injury requires going to the doctor, and who knows who the hell covers the bill in that situation (probably the victim after court, but perhaps tax payers).
I am glad that he did not inflict fatal injuries by breaking his head instead of his leg...but yeah, tazing would have been more appropriote and less physically/ monetarily costly.