Quote:
Originally Posted by BV
dude, you are so fucked up in the head it's not even funny.
I knew you would start with the Betamax shit.
You are dead wrong and I feel sorry for anyone that is ignorant enough to believe your drivel.
|
your making the same arguement that the court have already said is invalid, that making money automatically means it not fair use.
dozens of case say that but the betamax case said it it explictly and i quoted the passage more than 50 times.
i would not have to keep bringing up the same "Betamax shit" if you would stop making the same bogus arguement.
there is a clear difference between making money by selling access to copyrighted material (selling copies of copyrighted material) and making money off of service that provides a POTENTIAL functional ability to infringe copyright material.
i suggest you actually read the betamax case or at least the
supreme court ruling