Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
Actually I was talking to Mark, whose logical mind and reason have generally stood up to reason in the face of proof.
The 9/11 Commission and NIST did not come up with proof. The first ignored building 7 enitrely, the second said they couldn't explain the ease and speed and utter collapse of building 7.
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/r...estResults.pdf
The report states that temperatures couldn't have reached higher than 650 degrees celsius for longer than 20 minutes. They tested it much longer than that, and at higher temperatures. |
Why does your mind make you ignore obvious evidence about what really happened to Building 7 and harp on the fire angle. Is that being honest and objective. I mean just look under the collapse section of this wikipedia page -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center - and all the footnotes provided. Yet you still blather about fire.