You mean other than this study here:
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
That disproves everything you say?
Steel starts weakening at 300 degrees, it doesn't just begin to soften at 1000 degrees then melt at 1500. That's not steel. So, I'm not sure why you think you can draw numbers out of thin air and expect others to believe them, when there are actual facts that prove you wrong. Time and time again.
If you want to look at it in your conspiracy theory kind of way then think of it like this:
If the goal was to create as big of an explosion as possible, then why not knock the building over into some other buildings? Why wait until after the fires have been burning for a while to knock the building down? Why even bother sending planes if you can just blow it up and then say it was a terrorist. And most importantly, why bother blowing the whole building up? It made no difference that the whole thing crashed, the point was that two planes just hit two skyscrapers, it was the beginning of that war either way. So why would the government go out of their way and let tons of other demolition experts in on their little game when they could have just crashed planes into the building?
Any way you look at it, you're wrong, you know you're wrong, and it's become clear by you making figures up that you're just making your last attempts at trying to even sound like you could know anything, when in reality, its obvious that you've lost.
Sorry dude!